Canada is the only country where multiculturalism works. prove me wrong without resorting to memes

canada is the only country where multiculturalism works. prove me wrong without resorting to memes.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/qiaY4DhjHUE
youtube.com/watch?v=-sEqzEgDZ0g
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

many other countries that have multiculturalism works too

This isn't due to Canadian supremacy, rather it is due to European inferiority.

Like?

USA

Singapore

No, not really. Among 196 nationalities here only few have real problems with each other. Also lots of other countries without big problems with different cultures.

Try taking in millions of random refugees and economic migrants instead of the carefully vetted doctors and engineers you accept into Canada. It'll be a different story, and it has nothing to do with Canada's internal policies, only its immigration/border policy.

Brazil

Its because those immigrants are asians and not niggers

malaysia

China...

North Korea

Russia

It doesn't work; look at Surrey, look at Richmond.

Canada's foreign born population is 20% of their total, far higher than most European countries. Only NZ, Israel, and Australia have significantly higher percentage of foreign-born residents than Canada

Its not without occasional tension and a riot in 1969 killed 200 people including a fight between the chinese majority police and malay majority army.

I don't know but it seems like there's less niggers and mexicans in canada
I'd say that's the reason tbqh

They seem fine to me. Oh wait i never visit them because im white so who fucking cares.

It's the type of people they let in, I'd rather have a chink than a paki

That's the problem.

japan

Its a big country bruh, we have plenty of room for a shitskin district. Who else is gonna make coffee at tims?

>chinese majority police
the fuck are you talking about

It honestly doesn't work. We have huge enclaves of people who do not speak a word of either English or French. This makes it nearly impossible to get their co-operation at hospitals, in traffic accidents, in court, and so forth.

No
Good answers, thanks.

I still don't understand why 1st world countries and lefties want multiculturalism so bad, it's so fucking useless and nothing particularly good comes of it

Canada is still like 90% white

it used to be teenagers that were looking for summer jobs so they could afford college education and be successful in life

stfu leaf

I take it you haven't, and that your only real complaint is that not-white people dare to live in those areas.
Both are fine. Surrey's just poorer, but poorer people have to go somewhere.

It "works" because your country has no identity aside from trying to one-up America in progressive cuckoldry at all times. You feel none of the ill effects of multiculturalism because there is so little distinctly Canadian culture to deface in the first place. Its hard to see how your culture gets stripped away from multiculturalism when you have none to begin with.

Whereas in America we except cultural novelties like food and holidays, but beyond that you better assimilate and for the most part our immigrants do. Immigrants assimilate here better than anywhere on Earth.

USA = Multiracialism + Assimilation
Canada = Multiculturalism + Eradication

>We have huge enclaves of people who do not speak a word of either English or French
Where? In primary language acquisition, Canada is comparatively a huge success in both Quebec and the rest of Canada compared to any other country. The people who don't are immigrants who come in advanced age, and these are generally old relatives of people who got in largely based on family reunification, a class of immigrants that are numerically small in comparison to, say, the US.
The only such enclaves I can think of are tiny Ukrainian communities, which are extraordinary exceptions in that they've chosen to isolate themselves. And even then, many people who live in them learn English.

Canada taking Asian immigrants.

That's why your "multicultural" works.

Describe American identity without using meaningless terms that are universally considered positive social values.
Canada and the US fare similarly in a large number of integration measures, with the exception of a few where Canada fares much better (eg, language acquisition, economic achievement, education levels of second generation).

This.

Define "Work". If by "work" you mean it successfully destroyed Canada's culture and heritage and was replaced with a clusterfuck of 3rd world cultures that don't give a shit about Canada? Then sure.

We fucking had multiculturalism from day 1. We were a country of Pan-European cultures and it worked just fine. Then fucking liberal faggots decided to start bringing in shitskins and chinks and took it too far.

Your country doesn't have a culture either, burger. Only reason why it holds together is that you have no good system providing the weakest of society so it's swim or sink. Also the fact that immigrants who come to your country are usually from the more wealthy and educated groups of their home countries.

asians are more capable of adapting to western societies than arabs and niggers

t. low iq Canadian white nationalist who knows virtually nothing of his own country's history as is typical of his kind

Canada and Canadians outside of French Canada considered themselves British, not "Pan-European". It fell apart because the British Empire fell apart, just like it did in Australia and NZ. It was the non-British and non-French EUROPEANS who pushed for and got multiculturalism.

>le asians best immigrant group
Sure they commit less crime and aren't as poor but they don't integrate well into society, as you can see in every major american city who has a china/korean/vietnamese etc. town. they stick to themselves and operate like every other minority group

Multiculuralism only kinda works with white and asian people.
Any other races and it falls apart

Literally btfo in one post
RIP OP

American identity is about empowering the individual above all else, and is the basis upon which the rest of our value systems are built, most noticeably reflected in our federalist republican system. It's about standing up for your own values and competing them against others'. There's a common understanding of civility in free and open discourse. It's about maximizing negative freedoms and fostering our national drive for innovation, exploration and global impression.

Canadian identity is similar of course, but we were here first and are much more relevant

>multiculturalism works
>i don't communicate with other races in my country

Like Jewish neighbourhoods and Little Italy's don't exist? You mistakenly believe that those places are completely separate from everyone else probably because you've never left your country. Koreans aren't even the majority of Koreatown in LA, they're like 30 percent compared to over 50 percent hispanics.

...

Not so bad when it is extremely unsafe for a white guy to visit a black neighbor hood at night

it took a lot of effort to integrate italians and jews into american society too.
i've travelled to many parts of the world and that's exactly why i'm against multiculturalism. walking out of an airport into a society you aren't familiar with and you learn things one by one is one of my best experiences. filling our countries with foreign culture that eventually either will fade away or mix together is boring because then every place on earth will become the same.

i keep hearing 'food' as the only argument for multiculturalism which is bs. does it take a bit away from your white guilt seeing a brown person pouring maple syrup on a pancake or something?

>Canada and Canadians outside of French Canada considered themselves British, not "Pan-European"
You missed my point entirely, I'm talking about ethintic makeup, not identity shit. In the mid 1900s Canada was essentially a Pan-European nation. Brits and French made up the majority and the rest was Germans, Ukrainians, Poles, Italians, etc.. It wasn't until the 90s that non-European immigration became the most prevalent source of new "Canadians".

>It was the non-British and non-French EUROPEANS who pushed for and got multiculturalism.
Didn't say it wasn't. But I'm 100% sure in their mind at the time they didn't predict or intend for it to usher in a rush of Chinks and Paki immigrants a few decades later.

Individual vs the community; defense of community values; negative vs positive freedoms.
Fucking come on, these debates and tradeoffs have been considered in a lot of countries. The US in the aggregate may have settled on difference balances of things, but even all individual native non-immigrant Americans have different preferences on these scales. It's pure delusion to think that 'hurfdurf we murcans unique and special and all believe in the same shit' and pretend that the US or any country has been able to come to a common consensus. Hell, there's a reason your country is the most politically polarized of just about any functioning democracy in the world.

No.

youtu.be/qiaY4DhjHUE

Multiracialism is fine. Multiculturalism is counterproductive.

((()))

i get your point but the people who advocate for asian immigration but not other are just so brainwashed. they really can't imagine a 99% homogenous society, it's like they've been taught diversity is their strength their whole life.

like i explained in my post asian immigration seems harmless. they're educated and wealthy, much like the jews. and we know how that story goes. just check out the house prices in vancoucer

Sure

But America takes a very specific stand on the spectrum that few other countries take, unless you're willing to argue that America isn't ideologically different than most western nations. But the point is that America is about the individual standing against the world despite everything the world throws back. Europe recoils at this idea.

>I'm talking about ethintic makeup, not identity shit.
Your literally said "Canada's culture and heritage" you literal mouthbreather.
Just go right out and say that your entire argument is that non-white people in Canada are a problem.

Anyone who comes here is just as American as someone who was born here, despite what some rednecks think.I can't immigrate to Denmark and be seen as a Dane in a few years.

America's pluralism and polarization is one of its defining features, just like Canada. All Anglosphere nations have this to varying degrees

But America is more on the individualist side of the spectrum which further emphasizes that pluralism

Maybe I wasn't specific enough. Fine, you can point to something like the far stronger freedom of speech in American law than in any other jurisdiction. But keep in mind that I as a Canadian prefer the American way on this one particular issue, and many politically progressive Americans want far more limitations on free speech than I do.
I was more taking issue with logical leap to that it leads to the result that >Immigrants assimilate here better than anywhere on Earth.
There's no evidence to support this claim, and plenty to suggest that it's incorrect.

Multiculturalism doesn't work anywhere.

>Your literally said "Canada's culture and heritage"
Pretty sure your reading comprehension is just shit because I thought I was quite clear in my posts. European Canadians are more likely to care about Canada's heritage than fucking Pakis

>Just go right out and say that your entire argument is that non-white people in Canada are a problem.
I thought that was obvious from the beginning. Non-whites should not be allowed to immigrant to Canada in large enough numbers to displace the white population. Call me a fucking Nazi if it'll make you feel better.

>Anyone who comes here is just as American as someone who was born here, despite what some rednecks think.
>All Anglosphere nations have this to varying degrees
youtube.com/watch?v=-sEqzEgDZ0g

>non-white people in Canada are a problem
Good argument. Correct argument. Let's solve the problem.

>European Canadians are more likely to care about Canada's heritage than fucking Pakis
Provide any evidence at all that this is true, ceteris paribus. There's no Paki equivalent to, say, the completely isolated Amish community in Canada, or the Ukrainian Doukhobors.
>I thought that was obvious from the beginning. Non-whites should not be allowed to immigrant to Canada in large enough numbers to displace the white population. Call me a fucking Nazi if it'll make you feel better.
You're still trying to make it look like your argument has any rationale beyond this by saying >European Canadians are more likely to care about Canada's heritage than fucking Pakis
It's not actually about heritage, values, culture, etc. It's just about race. Why not just be honest about it? Why are white nationalists such intellectually dishonest chickenshit cowards all the time?

Iran