Does hip hop have the same artistic merit that classical music has?

Does hip hop have the same artistic merit that classical music has?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=tbF4FSU_nxg
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

The only rapper with artistic merit is Kendrick Lamar.

hip hop has the artistic merit of a wet fart

No.

yes

imagine having this opinion

>t. a boy of the soy

No. Relativists are running on the assumption of equality they've absorbed from the general milieu of modernity. If you mention some quantitative way in which x is better than y, they'll just attack the idea of standards themselves, which should tell you a bit about the kind of person they are. People with standards discriminate and understand that standards serve a purpose and have wider effects than "muh personal opinion".

No anybody who thinks so is fucking delusional

there is definitely tons of hip hop that is as artistic as classical music but comparing them is just all around a stupid thing to do

>there is definitely tons of hip hop that is as artistic as classical music

Hip hop has the least artistic merit of any genre of music. The best hip hop album can barely be compared with an average composition. That doesn't mean that hip hop is not enjoyable, but it is the equivalent of watching a childs cartoon or eating candy.

Hell no, but that's the point of hip hop. They don't fuck with prestigious distinguished bullshit cause it started in the slums. It's roots were all grimy raw music to shake your booty meat to.

They don't waltz or tango in your projects, eh?

no if u r a floating brain
yes if u have a body

it doesn't have the same artistic merit, it's merit is of a different variety altogether. apples to oranges. why spend your time making shitty bait threads when you can listen to music? do you even like music fag?

Um racist much?

hip hop has the artistic merit of a toddler tracing da vinci's work with crayon

do apples have the same artistic merit that oranges have?

No, obviously not. Anyone who would even remotely entertain the idea that "rapping" is comparable in any way to genuine music, is so blindly ignorant and foolish, so utterly aesthetically oblivious, that they are unworthy of the right to an opinion.

Our entire Western culture is dying because we killed the only people who believed in aesthetic beauty and moral uprightness, the National Socialists of Germany.

lol, cry more

>tfw even the leftist hipsers of Sup Forums are finally beginning to wake up
Good job anons

Objectively yes. Both have no merit whatsoever.

cLOUDDEAD has more artistic merit than David Guetta. Maybe more so than Einaudi even.

No, because most hip hop producers and artists have no idea what they're doing.

Hip hop has an incredibly high amount of repetition with regards to the music. Straight up repetition lowers the artistic merit of a piece of music. Even classical minimalism that relies on repetition like Glass or Reich has subtle changes over time, or complex things like phasing going on.

The main artistic merit of hip hop is in the lyrics, everything else is backing. Classical also has lyrics but the music actually reflects what is happening in the lyrics at all times.

Look at Strauss' 4 last songs and see how the music changes to underpin the meaning of the lyrics at all times (you'll need to find a version with English subtitles to fully comprehend this)

Hip hop tends to repeat a beat and rap a bunch of stuff over it. The beat never underpins the meaning of the lyrics but rather serves as a rhythmic constant for the complexity of the lyrics to exit over.

Here's the Strauss example: Perfect unison of lyrics and music - the music react to the meaning of the lyrics at all times, embellishing, underpinning the meaning.
youtube.com/watch?v=tbF4FSU_nxg