Sup Forums will defend this

Sup Forums will defend this

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=q3BVKQLLOc4
i.4cdn.org/sp/1502544989706.webm
youtube.com/watch?v=PSFiX4VHRTE
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

well someone needs to

Literally parallel with the ball

At least Sup Forums can defend

>minute 96

left foot just offside

hard to spot for the linesman tbf

My stream fucked up so not seen this goal. Post a fucking webm or gif not a jpg.

From the jpg it looks liek the ball is going backwards so it cant be offside

...

we probably would defend this, too bad Liverpool couldn't

lmao this wasnt even on purpose
meme magic cant stop laughing at liverpoop

ayyyyyyy

Fucking kek. Livershit BTFO.

>13 goals in 2 games
the mighty """""premier""""" league

The rules state that if any part of the body is offside, which gives the attacker an advantage, is ruled offside. Clearly his left leg and body are offside.

Besides the point though, Klopp fucked up the attackers. Klopp played Mane on the left, every time Mane got the ball in the corner, he flustered and tried to get rid of the ball fast, Salah has no right leg at all, he missed a bag of chances to score or stretch the defense and assist a scorer. We are not able to stretch the defense became the two wingers are not comfortable hitting the line. We should have won that by 4 goal. Fuck this shit, and Coutinho leaves this week.

Nigger, the ball was clearly a cross to the middle of the area, meaning the ball was travelling away from the net. Then Matip tipped it forward and Mignolet memed himself.

...

Its not an offside if the ball is traveling back you potato eating fuck.

top bantz

...

Did the ball travel back thats all I need to know

Ummm the ball cannoned of Mignolet, onto the bar and rebounded at the feet of the Watford player, sweetie.

No amount of blur can hid the fact that you play in front of empty stadiums.

> inb4 serie b
> Championships plays in front of packed stadiums

Why isn't it offside pls explain me

the offside rule only applies when the ball is going forwards you dunce

Carragher and Redknapp having a huge argument post match looking like they want to fight

halal

This is why the offside rule needs a reform. I don't see why passing the ball backwards should be an offside, it's the opposition's fault they let the offense get that far ahead

Link pls.

Stupid moron, he was in an offside position interfering with the PHASE of play. Anyway, besides the point, Klopp fucked up. Moreno is not aware as a defender.

because it was against liverpool
this board will go to unimaginable stretches just because it affects liverpool
it's a sad obsession

Read the rules moron.

>outing yourselves as casuals
The direction of the pass literally doesn't matter, it's not stated in the rules. All that matters is if the player is ahead of the ball.

>"I don't know what offside is because I'm American"

Fuck off back to hockey

The balls direction has NO impact on if it's offside or not, LEARN THE FUCKING RULES

It doesn't.
>A player is in an offside position if:
>any part of the head, body or feet is in the opponents’ half (excluding the halfway line) and
>any part of the head, body or feet is nearer to the opponents’ goal line than both the ball and the second-last
Britos is nearer than both the ball and the second-last defender and it is offside.

im sure it will be on youtube soon

>SerieA football knowledge

>literally say it's an offside, but the offside rule needs a reform because it really shouldn't be

Reading would be your friend

thats offside

was it called?

based jihad

>96

the fact that we got piss poor in the last decade only makes it more embarassing the richest league in the world can't provide better defence than our amatoure leagues

nope

ABL refs

Sorry, I only read the first half.

It is offside, but the referee bottled it

btfo
btfo
btfo

is there a webm of this?

probably on reddit

kek

it's in this thread, one of the last 10 or so posts

youtube.com/watch?v=q3BVKQLLOc4

...

funny accent

can you translate please?

allah looks down on you with a smile brother

i.4cdn.org/sp/1502544989706.webm

the amount of abls in this board is disgusting

Wasn't that hostile, I agree with Carragher, Redknapp is just spouting the >muh strong leader meme

Spanish time keeping

...

im honestly an anything but big 6 (+ lester)

ALWAYS THE VICTIM LA

Mingolet actually dived into himself.

Not offside

Klopp played his players backwards, all he had to do was flip Mane and Salah. Messi can't even do well on the right side with his left leg, Messi comes from deep in midfield. Salah and Mane were in the wrong position, no excuses, Klopp is a fucking muppet. Moreno has no awareness, he was at fault for the goal in the 1st half. Klopp had all year to find a replacement, but no, he kept that blind muppet. This is Klopp's fault.

>you can't pass the ball in a 2v 1 with the keeper

Lol what is wrong with you people, of course the direction of the ball matters

you're better than this italy...

I guess Italians stopped caring about the rules whenever they started buying refs.

salah played on the right all of last season; that's his position

bantz jihad

ABL literally always win

It does though. If whoever has possession passes backwards to a player it isn't offside. Why do you think so many players do exactly that when they've raped the defence and the keeper is being memed 3 on 1? Why do you think they don't just play it forward for an easy tap in. There was the exact same debate when Penaldo did it from the byline 2 years ago.
This is the same board that thinks it's offside if your hand or arm is ahead of the defender because they don't understand it has to be a body part that can score a goal. The same board that thinks "sufficient contact" means "any contact" to go to ground and then complains about players diving.
This board's collective IQ is literally Congo tier. Pity we don't have our own Leopold desu.

>a single frame
>can't tell if the ball has already been played
>can't tell if the goalscorer was moving prior

Is it Liverpool DNA to play the victim?

astaghfirullah

He's rubbish on the right, terrible signing. He will flop harder this time round so. Italian football is a couple of tiers down from the Premiership tbqh.

100 games and Klopp still hasn't done anything of significance to improve their defensive system. How long will they be patience with him?

More morons

See

the direction that the ball travels is completely irrelevant to whether a player is offside or not

Thank you.
Look no further than Kolanisac and Welbz inyesterday's game. No offside.

That's because 95% of the time the second player is behind the ball so is onside. Please read the laws of the game and stop embarrassing yourselves.

>exact frame of when pass occurs
All you need to know if it's offsides or not. Unless you want those things for context as to why the ref called what he did.

Ummm you sound upset sweetie :)

You know how fast a ball moves? There is no single frame of when the ball is played...

...

youtube.com/watch?v=PSFiX4VHRTE

...

Fuck off quoting that skank. kek

> upset
No, frustrated at seeing Liverpool draw with a team that they were leagues ahead of.

Wrong. Embarrassing

>In the context of Law 11 – Offside, the following definitions apply:
-“nearer to his opponents’ goal line” means that any part of a player’s head,
body or feet is nearer to his opponents’ goal line than both the ball and the
second-last opponent.

If the ball is traveling away from the goal line, it cannot lead to offside.

LIVERNIGS FOREVER BTFO

then why dont all teams just put one player at opposing penalty box all the time to receive the ball and then pass backwards to striker?

how did you get to that conclusion from that rule

nothing whatsoever about the direction of travel of the ball. as there shouldn't be, because it's completely irrelevant

Look at the picture you fuck. The player in question is flat footed and not mobile. Matip is running towards the ball yes, but the frame shows the offside players left leg farther past the ball and farther than matip is able/should run to defend that ball.

You can see all this with a still frame? Or maybe you are just seeing what you want to see you absolute fucking weapon.

They let it slip, m9

>going 1-0 down to them then going 2-1 down to them
>leagues ahead

Reading comprehension

>any part of a player’s head, body or feet is nearer to his opponents’ goal line than...the ball

The player MUST be ahead of the ball. He must be nearer to the goal line than the ball is. If he is further from the goal line than the ball is, or "behind" the ball as one might say, he is not nearer to his opponent's goal line than the ball, and therefore cannot be offside.

The replay has been posted in video format too. But again you don't need that to decide for this case.

>weapon
>m9
>american flag

/r/soccer please leave.

M8, it's the receiver's position that counts, not where the ball goes
If he's behind the ball and receives a forward pass, he's not offside
If he's in front of the ball and receives a backward pass, he is offside

yeah, again you don't appear to be reading my posts

the direction that the ball travels is completely irrelevant to whether a player is in an offside position of not

Is this the vaunted French "humour"

OH SNAPPPP
>

...

But the Liverpool defence is not leagues ahead of Watford's defence. They're about the same standard actually.

Pro tip: Liverpool's attack isn't that great either; they score lots of goals because the team is so unbalanced. When/if they fix their defence, the attacking football will suffer because so much of Liverpool's problems is in the positions the defenders take up. They're too high and too far apart. When a coach with some sense comes in to fix the defence, the number of goals up front will reduce. Loads of teams could look good up front if they reneged on all defensive responsibilities as Liverpool do.