Is Libertarianism just a way for Jews to protect themselves form state genocide?

Is Libertarianism just a way for Jews to protect themselves form state genocide?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Tb8cErokGFs
youtube.com/watch?v=Q_toYr_Hcdo
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wirtschaftswunder
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_School_(economics)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_school_of_economics
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_Era#Economic_policy
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Crash,_1929
youtube.com/watch?v=-KRi9nF8BiA
cnet.com/news/telecom-monopoly-overcharging-mexicans-billions/
youtube.com/watch?v=5K4Os5eXPw4
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

No, corporatism is.

Libertarianism is just degenerate classical liberalism.

Really makes ya think...

>libertarianism
>jewish
I don't know about that. There weren't many jews at the convention.
youtube.com/watch?v=Tb8cErokGFs

Yes

libertarianism exists in order to convince autistic goyim to destroy their own nation state for the benefit of globalists.

youtube.com/watch?v=Q_toYr_Hcdo

...

...

...

Keynes was a literal faggot and the only country which followed Keynesian economic policies after WW2 was the UK and they became the poorest country in Europe.

Oh Kek, the autism.

Truly the ideology of awkward manchildren

...

...

Keynes had a white wife and believed in eugenics

Not really. Any belief can be used for that cause. Which is why you get just as many socialists aiming for the same thing.

Hoppe tried to right the wrongs of libertarianism but the 'value is subjective' line of thinking is just too degenerate. And their argument that 'to think value is objective is to be arrogant/use force' just doesn't fly.

>Keynes had a white wife
And got in the pooper on the sidelines

>and believed in eugenic
everyone did

Also the UK was the only country that "didn't" follow Keynesian economics, at least until later than the other countries (US, Germany,) that did. Germany recovered almost instantly thanks to Keynesian economics.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wirtschaftswunder

They called it the "economic miracle" but it's no miracle if you understand economics.

>everyone did

wrong the jews that libertarians worship were all adamantly against it.

>Also the UK was the only country that "didn't" follow Keynesian economics, at least until later than the other countries (US, Germany,) that did. Germany recovered almost instantly thanks to Keynesian economics.
There was absolutely nothing Keynesian about the german economy.

>They called it the "economic miracle" but it's no miracle if you understand economics.
Which you clearly don't. Could you even define "Keynesianism" without googling it?

>wrong the jews that libertarians worship were all adamantly against it.
There is more to classical liberalism than the few jews you quoted.

Isnt kenyanism just keeping people buying things?

>There was absolutely nothing Keynesian about the german economy.
>massive influx of demand
>not Keynesian

>Could you even define "Keynesianism"

The easiest way to define it is using demand to stimulate production (inb4: comparisons to the broken window fallacy by idiots that's not what Keynesian economics is at all)

>There is more to classical liberalism than the few jews you quoted.

And it was roundly discredited during the Gilded Age.

After the Gilded Age only subversive jews like Rand were the ones still peddling the myths of "pure" free markets with no intervention just like they are the only ones still peddling Marxism and communism after the bloody rise of the USSR.

That makes no sense. If Libertarianism is about limited/no government, then Jews would have no means of infulence, and nobody would have a reason to hate them.

It's ensuring everyone has demand in an economy

In a country without demand you get stagnation and debt deflation (modern EU)

>And it was roundly discredited during the Gilded Age.
By whom, communist jews? Lmoa

>After the Gilded Age only subversive jews like Rand were the ones still peddling the myths of "pure" free markets with no intervention
No it just so happens that many leading libertarians were kikes. So they also peddled their open borders ideology.

Libertarianism results in oligarchy and rule by the banks and landed interests which will be run by jews

>what is the media
>what is the law
>what is academia

Jews benefit from excessive propriety just as much as they do from excessive government. The only way to combat them is through removal via authoritarian government.

Galbraith, who is hardly a defender of Hitler, actually wrote about the need to be more objective in evaluating him given his successful implementation of Keynesianism.

Please. If you think the last twenty years have reflected Friedman, you're a moron.

More like Paul Krugman.

>By whom, communist jews?

By every major Western economist

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_School_(economics)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_school_of_economics

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_Era#Economic_policy

>They also peddled their open borders ideology

They peddled globalism explicitly which means outsourcing, mass immigration and rule by multinational corporations.

Galbraith also did a good job of pointing out that the Great Depression was caused by (((speculators))) including Goldman Sachs, and was not at all caused by tariffs as claimed by Milton Friedmansteinberg

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Crash,_1929

The German economy had pretty much been either being a war economy, or under heavy reparations/economic instability, since 1914. Combine the Marshall Plan with a few years of stability, and all the Wirschaftswunder was is just Germany's gdp returning to about where it should have been.

>confusing the broken window fallacy with Keynesianism

why do idiots always do this?

The Broken window fallacy comes from Bastiat in the mid 1800s and has nothing to do with Keynesian economics.

Keynes never supported "destroying" capital.

I suggest for anyone interested to watch this video

youtube.com/watch?v=-KRi9nF8BiA

Also Krugman isn't even a proponent of Keynesianism in the classic sense, he believes in the neoclassical notion that we need to hand trillions of dollars to wall street (which is what Obama did) and that will magically save the economy.

Marshall Plan= exogenous increase of demand

It's really that simple. That's all Keynesianism is.

>And it was roundly discredited during the Gilded Age.
This fucking meme is ridiculous and needs to end. The gilded age was a bunch of carpet baggers coming to the South after the Civil War and buying up parts of government so they could collude together and ensure there was no competition. This is a government created monopoly. If the government didn't have the power to do that then nothing would've went wrong. Please tell me how the interstate commerce act was a free market policy. A lot of the assumptions made about that period are dead wrong anyways, The Jungle was a bullshit book and if the US was actually as horrible as it was as stated by socialists, then millions upon millions of immigrants wouldn't have kept coming here.

If anything this picture proves Milton Friedman was right. We've only been getting more and more regulation as time went on.

The monopolies were fucking up the entire American economy not just the south.

That's why based Teddy began trust busting.

regulation for wall street has dropped to nothing which is all (((Friedman))) seemed to care about

No one was even prosecuted when they nuked the economy.

The financial sector is devoid of any of the regulation that kept them from fucking up the economy between the 40s and 70s

Now they can fuck up whatever they want

>The monopolies were fucking up the entire American economy not just the south.
I'm aware. The South was just a larger victim because of reconstruction. The same argument applies though. The government interfered a lot during the gilded age, with tariffs, subsidies, and land grants.

>That's why based Teddy began trust busting.
Which was a good thing. The state created monopolies needed to be purged. That's not to say that anti-trust laws are perfect though. A lot of them hurt good trusts as well. See United States VS. Alcoa.

>regulation for wall street has dropped to nothing which is all (((Friedman))) seemed to care about
He didn't only want to deregulate wallstreet. He talks about a lot of other things if you care to listen to him.

>The financial sector is devoid of any of the regulation that kept them from fucking up the economy between the 40s and 70s
The crash was caused by the federal reserve though, not the market.

>The state created monopolies

There have to be regulations in place to stop business from hijacking the political process.


>The crash was caused by the federal reserve though,

It was caused by deregulation which came from a wall street and Goldman Sachs insider named Robert Rubin who made it legal to sell shit sub prime mortgages when he was secretary of the treasury during the Clinton administration.

In other words it's exactly what dumb libertarians advocate for, no regulation, muh free market

>good trust

there is no such thing. It's like saying there is a "good cancer"

>He talks about a lot of other things

mainly selling off public goods to private monopolies so they can price gouge, another libertarian staple.

cnet.com/news/telecom-monopoly-overcharging-mexicans-billions/

>There have to be regulations in place to stop business from hijacking the political process.
Good job dodging the point. What I'm saying is that the government intervenes in the market and hurts competition. For instance, minimum wages. Big corporations can handle that, it's their competitors who can't. These regulations make it easier to stay big because you have less to compete with. Natural monopolies rarely exist. Almost everyone you could name came through government action.

>It was caused by deregulation which came from a wall street and Goldman Sachs insider named Robert Rubin who made it legal to sell shit sub prime mortgages when he was secretary of the treasury during the Clinton administration.
The housing bubble and crash was caused by the Federal Reserve setting interest rates at 1% and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (government sponsered enterprises).

This explains a lot
youtube.com/watch?v=5K4Os5eXPw4