Why do so many filmmakers use shitty CGI in their movies?

Why do so many filmmakers use shitty CGI in their movies?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=bL6hp8BKB24
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

youtube.com/watch?v=bL6hp8BKB24

That's the thing. It was all real the whole time.

Because its expensive and time consuming

>CG is actually great says CG artist

They realised most people don't give a fuck so why put in the extra money for better CG?

>CG is actually great says CG artist

Shitty fx are cheapo 3d models.
Good are usually matte painting.

why is emma stone not my gf

He's not saying it's great for everything. He's just saying right now they're really good for the background shit you don't notice.

...

the same reason you save pictures of emma stone. retardation.

I don't think anyone disagrees with that. But when we complain about CGI, it's a shorthand for complaining about dictors/writers who think they can make up for a shitty movie by just shoehorning a bunch of over-the-top CGI action bullshit. THAT is the problem: how CGI is being used as a lazy substitute.

...

6

...

...

she's a 10 and you're a 2

>she's a 10

feel free to post whatever you think is a 10

chinks and photoshops are automatically disqualified

...

goose was already confirmed real life photoshop by best frogfu in crazy stupid love

>Prominent red A on her dress
>Prominent "RAY-BAN" on her sunglasses
Really makes you think