Damn... Really makes you think, huh?

Damn... Really makes you think, huh?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=QhnsC2V4_0w
factcheck.org/2009/04/counting-mexicos-guns/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

makes me think about sagebombing.

yeah we dont get shootings in the UK anymore

*glances over at dead MP*

...

Just because people break the borders doesn't mean we shouldn't have borders. Stop pretending like the wall won't make a difference.
A terrorist will find a way to kill yes, but that doesn't mean you open up and let them in.
No matter what, if a bigger wall saves just one life then it is worth it

>rodriguez
BUILD

Criminals will still have their weapons if we pass laws so I want mine to be able to defend myself

>Just because people break laws doesn't mean we shouldn't have laws
Actually in this case that's exactly what it means. If "banning" guns won't do anything, why ban them?

THAT

You should check your privilege.

If banning food cake will stop one person from choking, we should strongly consider it.

>if stricter gun ownership regulations save just one life then it is worth it.

Agreed, so let's compromise and ban all niggers, spics, and muslims from owning weapons.

If Fascism saves just ONE life. What if it's YOUR child? Etc.

hmm... really makes you think, huh?

I just don't understand how they don't understand that the horse is well and truly out of the barn.

So gun laws are tightened. Great, from that point on it's harder for people to purchase weaponry, and their options are now more limited.

What about the millions and millions of weapons already in circulation? Are law enforcement just going to walk up to Tyrone & The Gang and ask kindly for them to relinquish their arms? I wonder how they think that situation plays out.

Oh and about that border you've got with Mexico... no guns will be coming in through there, right?

Just cake? I say we ban all food.

But it is not okay for person to own a gun to defend themselves from said murderer.
"Save lives"
Right...

what if stricter gun ownership means someone can't get the gun that stops a hostile intruder?

If guns can save one life, then having them is worth it.

>if stricter gun ownership regulations save just one life then it is worth it.

THE EU IS THAT WAY
FREEDOM ISN'T FREE
MUH FOUNDING FATHERS MUH TYRANNY REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Also, I didn't get this from Facebook, I got it from her Twitter.
twitter.com/nik11102010

>SHUT UP. PLEASE SHUT UP.

>JUST BECAUSE PEOPLE BREAK LAWS DOESN'T MEAN WE SHOULDN'T HAVE LAWS. STOP PRETENDING LIKE DRUG ENFORCEMENT WON'T MAKE A DIFFERENCE.

>A DRUGGIE WILL FIND A WAY TO KILL, YES, BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN YOU HAND THEM THEIR DRUGS.

>NO MATTER WHAT, IF STRICTER DRUG CONTROL REGULATIONS SAVE JUST ONE LIFE, THEN IT IS WORTH IT.

Pendulums swinging. Shoes on the other foot. Tables turning. Etc.

so for over a century and they can site TWO homofags killed in "hate crimes"

Oh boy here we go again...

SHALL

I don't think the government is to blame for bad habits like anal sex that led to AIDS

>prohibit guns to save lives
If the Orlando story had been "Heavily armed gunman opens fire at nightclub, killed by homo with gun" nobody in the media or on the left would be claiming that the person who fired in self defense was responsible for saving 100 lives, even though it would be true.

When an armed person stops an attack on innocents it is a blip on the news, barely mentioned.

If keeping guns legal and easy to obtain saves just one life it is worth it.

There is no refutation of this that does not also refute the premise "gun control saves lives"

Really makes me think she's retarded.

If we banned personal swimming pools it would be worth it if we saved one life. You don't need a personal swimming pool, you can just go to the public pool or the beach.

If we banned just cars it would be worth it if we stopped one crash. You don't need a personal car, you can walk or ride a bike.

Sounds like bullshit to me, you can say the exact opposite.

>if gun ownership saves one life it's worth it.

Which has also been a thing for a while. Lots of good folks protect themselves from criminals using firearms (in the states anyway). Most of the time people who draw don't even have to fire.

If you ask me, pro gun Amsricans have their heads on straight. Gun control is a shitty meme.

By that same logic we should ban all unhealthy foods because it'll save lives

Alcohol and cigarettes should be banned as well, it'll save lives

Niggers should all be gassed, because in the end it'll save more lives than it takes away

>Oh and about that border you've got with Mexico... no guns will be coming in through there, right?
Well actually most guns here come from USA, there is not much of a market here. But if it becomes easier to get guns from the black market here than in the American black market then said market will have a big boom here...plz don't band guns America, drugs are enougth.

So what if having a weapon save one life too? Wouldn't that be also worth it? Check esse.

Yeah, we heard the same bullshit for weed and booze and look how that turned out.

what the fuck happened since nineties?

did really marxism hit the west so hard?

i dont want to live anymore

>Government and society are responsible for you getting AIDS from having too much buttsecks

youtube.com/watch?v=QhnsC2V4_0w

NOT

I hope all you of you have tweeted some variation of "if owning a gun saves one life, then it's worth it" at her.

Just cntrl f replace guns with immigrants/drugs etc.

WALL

Well, they do make it so tempting and acceptable. All the propaganda over the years. AIDS used to scare people, but it really doesn't anymore. But I suppose they aren't grabbing your cock and shoving it into another man's asshole... yet.

It's weird because half these people use this argument for Le 420 Legalize It.

>Islam is an American invention

Talk about some serious cultural appropriation.

>JUST BECAUSE PEOPLE BREAK LAWS DOESN'T MEAN WE SHOULDN'T HAVE LAWS.

>JUST BECAUSE PEOPLE USE GUNS DOESN'T MEAN WE SHOULDN'T HAVE GUNS.

>JUST BECAUSE PEOPLE USE DRUGS DOESN'T MEAN WE SHOULDN'T HAVE DRUGS.

If you don't like our laws you don't have to stay here. Constitutional convention + 3/4 states ratify or GTFO.

Sup Forums lives in a vacuum of memes, i wouldn't expect them to understand how gun control works.

like george carlin used to say; legalize everything and let darwin do the rest.

BE

Would these people not defend themselves if attacked?

I don't understand why all these people want to try to control them. It's disgusting. They deserve to be what they are without any discrimination from society or the government.

fuck off reddit

>1 out of 7 something billion

Fuck that.
Earth is full.

>Sup Forums lives in a vacuum of memes, i wouldn't expect them to understand how gun control works.

>Implying the Commonwealth understands how gun control works

lmao famalam... All you and the Brits ever do is spout memes about muh Dunblane and muh Port Arthur.

that's because we haven't had any massacres since port arthur...

>if stripping 330 million people of their rights saves one life it is worth it
Perhaps if you are fucking retarded.

Know the difference between a cow and Port Arthur?

You can't milk a cow for twenty fucking years.

But you've had shootings since Port Arthur... Shootings with semi automatic weapons. Are you really trying to argue that the introduction of draconic gun control measures in Australia has led to mass shooters suffering from bad aim?

>muh massacres

And then all the other violent crime shot up significantly. Oh, and bikers now manufacturing SMGs in their garages. Net loss of freedom for good people, who make up the majority of society. Hardly a success.

memes

Oh man...I could replace everything in the statement related to gus with illegal immigration and it would be just as true. And of course liberals would blow their fucking top.

NOT

if gun manages to save even one life, isnt it worth it then?

>Missing the point

#notanargument is a meme

you just can't help yourself, can you.

*Nods in agreement xD*

What does think think about the war on drugs?

Port Arthur is a meme, user. Why do Commonwealthers accept being memed on by the government without question?

I was attacked by a nigger 2 hours of ago in an attempted mugging. I drew my handgun and he ran away.

Fuck you, and fuck your gun control.

He's an idiot. Just ignore him.

port arthur changed australia forever. sure we have some shootings once in a blue moon but america has massacres every other day.

im sure you would feel safer living in the usa though...

Don't give guns to anyone below IQ of 100.

so 99% of americans then?

...

Memes.

She used to smoke weed at our fucking High School.

no, that is a fact.

disagreeing with facts is a meme, stefen molyneux and milo yianolpolous do that best.

Guns are different because, in the hands of a law-abiding citizen, they're a tool for preventing and stopping crimes (especially mass shootings). I've looked at a lot of the shootings that happen in America, and I see one common theme: they all happen in gun free zones, where the only people with guns are criminals. If America bans guns, it'll turn its entire country into a gun free zone and you'll see an increase in gun crime.

>waah he gib me a meanie

>port arthur changed australia forever.
Only because you allowed your government to go full-UK-meme-tier on your gun laws.
>sure we have some shootings once in a blue moon
Which proves that the knee jerk reaction on Port Arthur doesn't actually mean jack, unless you ACTUALLY believe that gun laws deminishes aim in spree killers.
> but america has massacres every other day.
What does that even have to do with anything though? Our gun laws are strict, but not UK-commonwealth meme-tier and we don't have massacres every other day, or even week, either.

>massacres

Part of me want's gun banned just so these fags run around in circles when another massacre happens

woah...

>it's a fact because it's my opinion

then this cunt will have no problem enforcing the immigration laws.

INFRINGED

>You
>You
>You

America is not one person with one opinion. It has many points of view and many opinions. They range the spectrum from thoughtfully well-conceived to batshit utter insanity. Whether or not people were outside shouting about how shitty homosexuals are is immaterial in this case. In this case, a man's internal struggle with accepting his homosexuality ran against the ridiculous pressure exerted by his faith, and the only way he could conceive of a positive outcome in the afterlife was to reject the unholy nature of his sexuality and become a martyr for his faith. None of what this image describes is relevant here. The situation is more complicated than Facebook shitposting.

>pol: Wearing seat belts won't completely eliminate car crash deaths. Therefore we shouldn't wear seat belts.

normal person: But seat belts reduce serious crash-related injuries and deaths by about half. Wear your seat belts.

>pol: Condoms aren't 100% effective. Therefore we shouldn't wear condoms while having sex.

normal person: But condoms significantly reduce the chance of pregnancy. Wear condoms.

>pol: Why take away guns, criminals are going to find a way to get them anyway. Therefore we shouldn't take away guns.

normal person: But taking away guns makes it harder to obtain guns, thus reducing the chance of random shooting. Take away guns.

Why can't Sup Forums into logic?

That's her on the left. She got fatter since HS. She is currently attending Texas State to become an English Major.

You going to become a cop and escort me around, you dumb gook?

Having a gun literally saved my ass this morning. I hope a muslim beheads you.

>just two weeks ago I called trans women child predators
try 4 years ago
also "women"
>1 year ago you were saying that our marriages shouldn't be recognized
No I was saying you should be hung from a crane
>6 years ago you were saying fags shouldn't die for their country
no I believe they should die for america just not in uniform but rather by men in uniforms (and armbands)
>10 years ago you told us we didn't deserve job protections
no I was saying you didn't deserve lawful protection
>13 years ago it was illegal to be a fag
shame that was changed
>18 years ago matt shep
killed by a fellow faggot
>23 bradon teena
"American trans man who was raped and murdered"
from wiki, literally no one would have given a fuck if this chick was raped and killed without the tranny shit
>36 years ago faggots were dropping like flies because of grids
Your fault
>43 years ago we were considered mentally ill
Implying you're not
>47 years ago the riots of stonewall
done by faggots should have ended with a purge of you scum

He didn't kill you faggots because of our hatred of you he probably hated every thing we stand for, he killed you fags because of islamic "homophobia", face it queers not alot of people like you

Omar did nothing wrong

*uses asterisks unironically*

You might want to double check that assumption.

factcheck.org/2009/04/counting-mexicos-guns/

>I'M IN ALL CAPS BECAUSE IT SHOULD BE OBVIOUS THAT THIS IS WHAT WE SHOULD DO NONE OF YOU HAVE COMMON SENSE JUST SHUT UP
god I hate those all caps posts.

yes we have
there have been plenty of mass murder events over the last 20 years

The crazies that spit on returning Vietnam veterens had children. It isn't shocking to see how that turned out.

If it takes 867 good guys to die to save one criminal from dying to an armed good guy, then it is worth it.

It reminds me of those retards that say "gun murders went down since the gun ban".... and hen someone says, yeah, but look at the stats, overall murders went up since the gun ban.... and their answer is "so what, gun murders went down".... they can't fucking grasp basic concepts.

So she believes the war on drugs and the laws that came with them didnt work, so why have those laws?

What if we start killing babies at birth because they could be insane at some point?
We also should break arms and legs because you can use them to kill others.

If killing people can save at least 1 life, then it is worth it

Is it worth it if it costs one life?

>he's mosque's Iman specifically said gays should be put to death
>"IT'S THE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE'S FAULT GUYS"

Tell me exactly why """"scientific""" research shows that leftists has higher IQ?

You do know the fag who wrote that can't see this?

Condoms are a choice, and you don't have right to drive without a seatbelt, something that also only endangers yourself, but you do have the right to own a gun.
Why can't gooks into logic?