>accio Voldemort
>summon him in a place surrounded by 50 wizards casting Avada Kedavra on him at the same time
>Problem solved
Was it so difficult?!
Accio Voldemort
Christian James
Dominic Gray
dullest etc. im too tired to post it
Samuel Thomas
Based Potterposter
Jace Robinson
jkrowling.com
>FAQs
>3. Why couldn’t Newt use ‘Accio’ to retrieve all his beasts?
>‘Accio’ only works on inanimate objects. While people or creatures may be indirectly moved by ‘Accio-ing’ objects that they are wearing or holding, this carries all kinds of risks because of the likelihood of injury to the person or beast attached to an object travelling at close to the speed of light.
Luis Baker
"No!"
Joseph Bell
isn't this a discussion for /lit/?
(I know that /lit/ will say fuck off with kiddy books)
Austin Ward
That wouldn't have worked, seeing as how once Voldemort arrived, he would comment on how this is still one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises throughout. each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
Caleb Perry
>forgetting to post the picture
you are slacking off
Luis Hernandez
Get fucked.
Jack Turner
But when Harry summoned his broom in the fourth book which was complete BULLSHIT it didn't move at the speed of light.
Also one of the Durmstrang niggers summoned his friend with Accio during the ball and nothing bad happened.
BULLSHIT
Cooper Ward
Because his name dared not be spoken.
Zachary Brooks
you know that that picture is a troll one, right?
Nolan Young
She's making amends now, just let it happen
theguardian.com
Benjamin Nguyen
Also Harry did accio Hagrid in the 6th or 7th book
Liam Ross
Man I always thought Hermione should have ended up with Harry too
Zachary Clark
honestly shocking performance
just give up
Adrian Harris
Or just shoot him with a fucking gun?
Easton Clark
On a side note, why didn't Voldemort use "Accio Elder's Wand"?
Brody Wright
accio gf
Hunter Clark
accio horcrux
Alexander Phillips
accio feelings
Michael Allen
Why?
Austin Sanchez
>‘Accio’ only works on inanimate objects. While people or creatures may be indirectly moved by ‘Accio-ing’ objects that they are wearing or holding, this carries all kinds of risks because of the likelihood of injury to the person or beast attached to an object travelling at close to the speed of light.
>close to the speed of light
hahah what?