At what age did you grow out of democuckcy?

At what age did you grow out of democuckcy?

When i discovered Mosley, and came to see how most people don't know whats best for them

Lmao what is your alternative fuckass? Anarchism or totalitarianism? Study for your Algebra 1 final or go back to your cuckshed, respectively.

Constitutional monarchy

How do you keep the king from violating the constitution?

Why the fuck are you using that pic? It makes me sad and hurt.

The same way you keep a President from violating it

Back when Swedes were men and would carry the body of their Sovereign through hell to see him laid to rest.

Two other branches, and checks on their power?

Doesn't sound like a Monarchy to me.

Checkmate.

Are you genuinely retarded?
If a law is unconstitutional it cannot be enacted. Not even if all three branches support it

Nice proxy

Never you fucking edgelord. As appealing an effective autocrat may be, those tend to be rare.

>am I retarded

And who decides whether something is constitutional? Oh right, the Judicial branch.If all three branches support something, it becomes constitutional.

When you realize democracies degenerate into anarchy or socialism.

Got any proofs?Or just a mere acusation?

>Oh right, the Judicial branch
They aren't voted democratically fuckboy

Socialism and democracy aren't mutually exclusive.

...

it should make you proud of your nation you fucking disgrace to western civilization

They're chosen by our democratically elected leaders within a larger democratic system.

When I learned about how the EU dealt with the EU constitution referendum.

While I was reading the republic.

Think I was 12 when I played my first Civ game and 16 when I realized what idiots do with absolute power.

Are you trolling or are you really that slow? You can have a supreme court upholding the constitution without a pandering parliament full of cucks who sell your country for nigger votes

>absolut power
>constitutional monarchy

Oh yes praise Kaiser Merkel.

when i became a paleolibertarian

I'm not slow you legitimately don't understand the full picture of this. With more centralized power you have more room for corruption.

>pandering

You mean voting how their people want them to?

user you don't have the right to call anyone a cuck when you want to give up full control of what is done with your money, how much is taken, what wars you get into or what laws are imposed on you. You are a submissive little bitch who wants all your decisions made for you.

We need direct democracy.

If we could vote for things individually we will be less dependant on the parties' package solutions.

>USA projecting
nothing to see here guys

That's technically a form of democracy, assuming it has a parliament made up of elected officials. Even if they're just elected by landowners and wealthy taxpayers.

>looking at a depiction of one of your nation's heroes dead after receiving a very unlucky bullet to the head should make you proud

Nah, I think "sad and hurt" is perfectly fitting

Feel free to use all your brainpower to come up with an argument.

I have always been a happy capitalist pig, but became truly conservative when I started to achieve things worth being proud of, and ultimately, keeping...ironically, by rejecting the programming of the collectivist left.

You are both advocating for the same

stop, this is nonsense

>You mean voting how their people want them to?
Yes

>what is done with your money, how much is taken, what wars you get into or what laws are imposed on you
PFFFFFFFFFF HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>t. Israel's slave

grow up.

The United States isn't a democracy.
Democracy=Mob Rule

>assuming it has a parliament made up of elected officials
It hasn't. Fuck parliaments

>Study for your Algebra 1 final or go back to your cuckshed

Come on man, that's too specific not to be projection

I am advocating for a Constitutional Republic, I am arguing that a Monarchy is anti-freedom and submissive. Fuck you if you think I'd bend over to a king.

I think most of Sup Forums agrees with myself that all nations of the world would be better off with a Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, etc., for a leader instead of a democracy. Just look at the facts and you will agree that their nations were better off than the USA, Canada, France, the UK, etc.

you cannot prove me wrong.

Nice thread, OP.

Literally a #ShillforHill
You're bending to a literal nigger right now cuckboy

I didn't
I still believe in democracy, though not a liberal one
More like an ethnic democracy like jews have in Israel

Algebra 1 implies you're in 8th grade.

at this point it practically is

>Monaco
>Constitutional monarchy
>One of the wealthiest places on earth
>Catholic state, over-privildged natives, tough immigration and extremely tough naturalization
>0 debt, champagne flowing on every street, people driving their lamborghinis to buy baguette in the morning
remind me why democracies are a thing again

Lol how many memes can you fit in one post.

I'm not voting for Hillary. Like many immature kids on Sup Forums who refuse to admit they're wrong, you have just resorted to insults and Sup Forums memes.

When everyone voted for retarded shit

So it does, Christ that feels like it was an entire lifetime ago.

>I have no idea what I'm talking about

Western liberal democracies are a form of democracy and are referred to as such. Can you vote on leaders and policies? Then you live in a democracy.

Around the age if 19 when I got my first actual job. I was still in school back then but decided to work and save up for university. When you have to deal with shitskins on a daily basis, get robbed at least once every 6 months and have to kick out the same fucking gypsy bitch from the store on a weekly basis, it takes some pretty darn good mental gymnastics to deny racialism, and I was never good at mental gymnastics.

No I was implying you are just as submissive. Just not to a worthy king serving your people but an installed puppet serving the jews. Sorry I have to spell it all out for you since you're the literal embodiment of that freedom is best :DD picture

mate the caroleans are one of the main reasons i dont rag on you fucks for being cucks more

Well user once again you've proven that you're nowhere near as intelligent as you think you are.

I never once said that the United States is a functioning Constitutional Republic. And your simplification of the situation to "Its just the joos" Is another sign of huge stupidity.

It's a 3 powers thing with a powerfull executive.

In burgerspeak the king leaves his seat every 4 to 8 years
In germanspeak the king leaves when it dies or it's too old-shit

It's the same unless the american is saying that the political leaders don't form part of a elite, wich is crazy taking in count the most likely to win it's a woman married to an ex president from house clinton.

Even chinese 2000 years ago told that romans had kings who left the throne "voluntary without fight"
You are arguing about something that some chinese explorer already explained

i fucking hate you both

Yeah, sure.

You know that Constitutional Republics aren't exclusive to the United States yeah?

>muh constitutional monarchy
Our "kings" were the reason we lost asia minor. Fuck them.

If anything, technocracy is the only viable alternative to democracy. Monarchy is for edgy children.

So an oligarchy you fucktard. Any monarchy ends up becoming a handful of elite that control the strings. The king is just a puppet.

>And your simplification of the situation to "Its just the joos" Is another sign of huge stupidity
That wasn't my point but I give up

The third branch is complete garbage

Nope.

When I became a trad. Catholic and a distributist.

When I was 16 I started hanging out with white nationalist skinheads.

I'm still conservative, but not as extreme about it.

>So an oligarchy you fucktard. Any monarchy ends up becoming a handful of elite that control the strings. The king is just a puppet
Yes, but mostly "No."

Of course i know, we all have the same baseline system

We had 2 kings from house Kirchner.

I think the only constitution who didn't bullshit was the paraguayan wich implies the executive should ram the other two.

this is a very apt description of modern democracy
Just replace king with president/prime minister

If you went in any academic or political circle, really anyone who is educated the smallest amount on government and tried to say that Republics aren't forms of democracy, you would be laughed out of the room. You don't know what you're talking about, bottom line.

When I saw what's happening in Europe and in America. These countries are being killed and their own fucking people are supporting it.

I just came here to post this.

Didn't even know this pic was known outside of Sweden.

>there is a successful conspiracy to manipulate the masses against their own itnerest and our government is completely corrupt
>people voting democratically is the problem

Pick only fucking one.

We can agree on this. The US is basically becoming a pseudo-democracy (IE an oligarchy). People forget that the original government of the US according to the founding fathers is a republic, not a democracy. Sovereignty lies within each citizen. Direct democracies do not work because if 51% of the population votes for something the other 49% have nut up and deal with it.

Didn't know it was known in Sweden

I pick 2 you faggot. The idea is to post contradicting statements when you do this pick 1 shit

>a conspiracy by the people we elect to our government

The third branch it's the best branch

We have precedents of the third branch in both common law monarchism and Continental Monarchism.

The supreme court is the outcome of both.
Legislative knows jack shit about common joe life (seen in continental monarchism judiciary system)
But i agree that burgerlanders gave too much power to theirs.


We could try a democratic election in the judiciary too, but i don't think it will go well

A republic is a democracy. It is a form of representative democracy. If you vote for leaders and policies, you live in a democracy.

The degree to which this complete misunderstanding has permeated Sup Forums without being challenged shows proof positive that most of you aren't qualified to talk about politics.

You don't even fucking know what type of government you live under.

They are contradictory. If A is true, then the problem is corruption, not democracy.

Because the poor like the feeling that they have power in the country decisions

Many of them aren't elected, most of them are just disobeying their constitution.

Sorry meant the parliament is shit courts are fine

>We could try a democratic election in the judiciary too, but i don't think it will go well
No same problem

We make these things amendments and play with semantics on interpreting the law kind of like people interpreting passages of the bible differently.

Not yet. Then again we have actual democracy, not that pseudo democracy bullshit you guys have.

>They're chosen by our democratically elected leaders within a larger democratic system.

Depends on the country. Here they are co-opted

The problem is the masses get corrupted because they are the fucking masses
>Do you want free money and submit to Israel for eternity
>YAY FREE MONEY

We elect the ones who appoint the ones that aren't elected.

Roman Style Republic
Monarcy

Heck I would take dictatorships over democracy.

plebotarian

Israel isn't the problem. The dindu-in-chief and the Democrats are. And the cuckservatives in the Republicuck party.

>Didn't know it was known in Sweden

I'm an oldfag. They probably replaced learning about the caroleans with talking about Sweden's role in the slave trade.

Missing the point

Not sure if that's a cuck joke since we literally got told in school Germany was a major part in the slave trade

Submissive gypsy cuck.

I'm blaming a Constitutional Republic that is no longer Constitutional or representative. If functioning it would be the best system, unfortunately over the past several decades it has been infiltrated and corrupted. Our system isn't the problem, the corruption is the problem.

And somehow your solution is to make all of those problems 100% worse rather than clean up our democracy.

>Bitching about semantics makes me more qualified to discuss politics than all of you
Fuck off. In a democracy sovereignty is invested in the group. The "representatives" exercise the power invested by the individual sovereign citizens in a republic. The federal government should be equal to the states and not above them. Just because modern dictionaries have bastardized the two terms to have similar meanings doesn't make them the same.

What is the point then?

It's not semantics, you literally don't know what type of government you live under. A Republic is a form of representative democracy, bottom line.

>If functioning it would be the best system
Top tier argument democuck

That people make selfish short-sighted decisions

I guess we agree, then.

No, you're wrong. A true republic is not a representative democracy.

Capitalism assures corruption.

There are functioning republics. Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, the Netherlands.