Why did european tribes envolved as more complex civilizations while south american indigenous did not?

Why did european tribes envolved as more complex civilizations while south american indigenous did not?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaingang_people
youtube.com/watch?v=P4yOsNz75H4
youtu.be/JEYh5WACqEk
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_Space_Agency
sq.4mg.com/LynnIQdiff.htm
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Because some races are genetically more intelligent than others.

Why is every white nation wealthy whereas every black nation is poor across the world?

And most South Americans have poor Indian blood which ruined their Spanish heritage.

Tribes in the middle east did the same, they had one of the earliest civilizations on Earth

Evolutionary pressures of the last Ice Age.

They're here to be subjugate and for breed.

Do you have any source on this?

Cold weather

Cold weather animals are universally smarter then their warm weather cousins

Where can I find that tribe at?

Meh.

Native americans didn't assimilate other tribes/cultures, they were mostly isolated.
The old world on the other hand was a shitstorm. Europeans knew about pretty much all european tribes and most of the North Africans and Asians.

There were knowledge exchange in pretty much everything, from agriculture to war.

The history of the world is geography and logic applied.

I was under the impression the Incans were very based.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaingang_people

Mostly in the south of BR.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaingang_people
you go rape them chad

The resources for agriculture.

That's it.

Agriculture.

Hive mind

time

they lived in warm tropical climates and had everything on a plate, the white man had to hunt and brave warm conditions, making him smarter, thus is evolution

>Why did european tribes envolved as more complex civilizations while south american indigenous did not?
Christianity. Tribal religions are too disparate to lend themselves to building a big society.

The harsh climate of Europe sped up our evolutionary process via natural selection. You can't afford to be a stupid nigger when colonising fucking glaciers.

European lands weren't as fertile, and definitely not as isolated
This forced the exchange of culture and trade with other cultures such as Persians.
The constant attack from other cultures forced certain cultures to evolve accordingly in the ways of welfare

But mostly the southern tribes never really had to develop techniques to survive, or develop democracies

If they were not hunting, they were being hunted or in a state of basic warfare that made it difficult to make room for "thinkers" such as Plato.

The mathematicians that lived in Greece during early west. civ. had little chance of survival in African/southern lands, thus the natives who lived in these lands were those who were fit to live in them.

Ancient Egyptians/Mayans/Aztecs/Ancient China

They certainly had the access to, there were many points in history where many native americans could be linked. They genuinely were not as intelligent as Europeans, or they would have evolved. In fact, by the time we showed up, the golden ages of the successful native empires had already collapsed. We showed up after the party was over.

I'd fuck a 14 year old squaw any day.

Its almost like you listed a whole bunch of civilizations that got outclassed by the europeans

Sir, I have to ask for you to leave.

My impression on the matter is South and Central America developped civilizations, which kept falling over and over.

Of course in the "West" (in the broad sense since I'm including Mespopotamia) too, civilizations fell, but there was always some sort of... continuity, maybe? Which made it so the following empires always kept stuff from the previous ones, in terms of political organization and land management.

I have no idea why that is, maybe because of interconnection like said.

Ok

No. Just a theory that one sees discussed a lot. It is natural to assume that evolutionary pressures differed in places into which glacial ice shelves were advancing, when compared to places such as equatorial Africa, Australia, or South America, for example.

European colonialism

>Mediterranean glaciers

fuck off jared diamon

Exactly, cold weather forces you to plan ahead which requires intelligence. Those who don't won't survive so only the smartest procreate.

youtube.com/watch?v=P4yOsNz75H4

what the hell are those women wearing?

dem perky tits

Egyptians and the Chinese are at similar Latitudes to the USA. Look at a fucking map.

>Aztecs/Mayas
stone age violent niggers

So why are inuits and native Siberians so primitive?

Doesn't explain how the Natives in North America (some parts of which are colder than a fair number of European nations) never moved past hunting and gathering.

Most Ancient Civilizations were far more advanced than their white counterparts, most of the white race was allowed to catch up by being conquered by Rome, so one advanced white race allowed mud hut dwelling savages the chance to catch up. Without the kickstart most of Europe may well have not progressed at the rate that it did. The white race as a whole only overtook China in the past 300 years so it has nothing to do with cold weather climate and hunting. Without the technological trickle down from left by Rome and then if the Dark ages hadn't ended we may well of still been a bunch of backward fucks either frozen technologically during our pagan worship days or the middle ages.

Maybe it does have more relation to the isolation from other civilizations as pointed out.

colder climates

>tfw no south brazil gf

they had plenty of animals to eat and catch, there was 1 Native American civilization in the Eastern US but European illnesses wiped them out

...

Saving this to beat off later.

>The white race as a whole only overtook China in the past 300 years
Though I accept your overall point, this is patently absurd. So the Chinese had gun powder... that's it. Europeans overtook the Chinese at least 1000 years ago.

Native northern americans also dismantle the "Guns, Germs and Steel" argument no matter what that dude said.

They had literally everything. Probably the most prosperous continent in the world and they didn't evolve past scalping each other and living in tents.

"Europeans" as we know today rode on the dicks of Romans civilization and the technological drive caused by frequent war. Most native Americans only lead raids for sacrifices, resources, women, etc.

There was never a drive for dominance or complete eradication of their enemies since for the most part they're all related by blood, much like the European nobility.

Europeans also had the advantage of having a history of sailing and seafaring, which led the to exposure of different cultures and scientific thought.

So basically whites only got to where they are now by being Jew like in their interest in trade and creating national wealth.

They're called ancient for a reason faggot

Convenience of geography. European tribes were the beneficiaries of Greco-Roman influence.

Even then, Euros have been using gunpowder for 700+ years.

Ancient China was in a constant state of warfare both large and small and yet still developed at the same pace with Greece and Rome as well as producing philosophers and inventors.

Having to survive the winter + high concentration of population (equalling a society where IQ boosting mutations would immediatly spread in large numbers)

The answer is trade routes, smart men learn from someone else mistakes.

We had to walk from wherever the fuck we came all the way to Mexico and Peru, some say that it may have taken up to 20,000 years, those are years that we did not use to settle and domesticate animals anyway, by the time the Spanish arrived the Mexicans were about 1500 years behind European civilizations and the biggest mesoamerican empires had passed. It's not like they were subsaharan nigger tier, they were on the right track but the long hike from Europe to America made a dent in their advancement, I'm drunk so please no bulli.

That still doesn't explain why various races weren't able to develop on their own the way they did, the Americas and most of Africa only developed because they were colonized you fuckwit.

What a qt

Wheat

>muh winter

Explain swedes.

Necessity is the mother of inventions, why bother creating when what you have has worked for as long as your people can remember? It's a lot like Japan and their ritualized warrior code. When there is no true external threat for you to sharpen your blade on, cultures can stagnate from the lack of new information and ideas.

The natives were however actually extremely advance in medicine, astronomy and agriculture. You just never hear about any of that since Sup Forums is just stormfront electric boogaloo

>Why did european tribes envolved as more complex civilizations while south american indigenous did not?

Why should they?

Men in hunter-gatherer bands in the Amazon or Africa often work LESS hours per week than the average man in the USA.

"Complex civilization" is certainly better off for those who inherit massive amounts of wealth. Is it better off for the average person? The very wealthy make claims that it is, but workers tend to be more skeptical of this. For every benefit there is also a massive drawback.

>Not mathematicians.

I know you hate all the shitskins, but men Mayans were cool and shit.

if anything that would have made you more thick skinned and evolved, idk how you can say
travelling through north america, the high areas of canada.

the indio must be subhuman

If they didn't know how to plan ahead like the people in the south. They would all be dead before they would know to plan ahead.
Where did they acquire the knowledge to plan ahead? Muh ice age

This is factually wrong.

youtu.be/JEYh5WACqEk

Still not as much as the old world.

Take the arabs: Sup Forums believes that we're untermensch, with low IQ and agressive as fugg, thus not being able to create a great civilization. Ancient arabs used to live in the fucking desert and weren't something that persians or romans would bother, we were just fucking nomads.

The arabic language is rich as fuck, because it has lots of influence of the old Sumer, for example: Shamash in Sumerian was the Sun God, while Shams in arabic mean sun.

The arabic sword (the scimitar) is actually a Persian invention, same as the arabic numbers (Persia and India).
The islamic religion has evolved from the Hebraic culture, and molded the Arab world as it is today.

We also got a lot of influence from the Byzantines and other shit, and today, although Sup Forums believes that we're just shitty people living like savages, we could manage to live in organized societies with a very "rich" culture, but in the end, as I said, it's just a freaking mosaic that we got from other civilizations we've clashed.

I strongly believe that native americans haven't crossed their paths as much as we did.

they didn't have as much time to develop after settling down

given a few thousand more years they may well have

anyways north american natives >>> south american natives >>> central american natives

Because Europe has more arable land and domesticated animals, it was much easier to stay put and advance rather than be hunter-gatherer.

1) The natural inhabitants of what is now the US never progressed past that of tent dwelling nomads.

2) Egypt isn't cold, look at a fucking map

You fuckers were domesticated by the Romans, you pricks lived in mudhuts when the teotihuacans were building piramyds, your proximity to the Roman Empire pulled you from the caves.

Different genes.

pyramids were in the 1400s.

They didnt, but they couldve done better. Maybe they couldnt have crossed the Atlantic if they had the european genes, but they couldve evolved better. For example, the Aztecs were sort of their version of Romans, but they were much more hated by their conquered people. If this had been averted, it would have played out differently.

>we wuz pyramids n shit gringo
>gib job pls

>Sup Forums believes that we're untermensch
>we're
You have to go back.

And also, whatever you say about arabs is completely invalidated by the savagery that is Islam. Until you fix that shit and make it acceptable in our world you'll be regarded as a bunch of savage goatfuckers.

South America had it's complex civilizations. Not as complex as Europeans but leagues above niggers.

>every white nation is wealthy
>Russia
>Croatia
>Romania
>Bulgaria
>Belarus
>Lithuania
>Latvia


>Wealthy

>he doesnt know his own flag

cuck. didnt you have your state flag in every classroom in school?

Very related topic

Mutations then selection

Because Europe had winters that would sometimes last 6 months and kill all the dumb people.

What he said.

Those were the ones in Mexico City, tenochtitlan, there the ones north that no one knows when were they build or by who and the Mayan empire was gone too, some Mayans are dated on the early 200.

>completely invalidated by the savagery that is Islam

That's a sunni problem.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_Space_Agency

inbreeding fucked arabs up, also the desert heat, Arabs had writing in 400ad, natives never had writing.

You forgot moldova and ukraine, whitest countries in europe bar none.

where are their damn pubes?

Intentionally done by the alien race living in the earth so that humanity will be distracted with each other instead of focusing on their real oppressor.

Yes, they are incredibly wealthy compared to africa and most of asia, seriously.

What is communism?

sq.4mg.com/LynnIQdiff.htm

>jews

I guess their potential for achievements would be as high as anyone else, if they didn't devote 99% of their time to stone women, kill gays, behead infidels and look for every way possible to destroy and conquer our civilization. Sure.
Should we also put the pooinloos in our same level because they will be a designated superpower by 2030?

In what sense did Europe overtake China other than perhaps exploration through more advanced ship building? Warfare/Architecture/Science/Philosophy all seem pretty equal up until we started firing lead balls at each other. 300 years may have been a bit too little but 1000 years is way too much, I'd say 500 or so years ago is the point we left them behind as far as military technology and average quality of life goes.

The olmec civilization was building monuments and shit since the 1500 BC

We had better weapons, better tactics and better discipline, we also had a greater understanding of economic principles and were better at trade, all of these things caused the century of humiliation. Also Europe had a lot of small, powerful states all trading and fighting each other, our countries were more populous per square inch and more urban too.

>we apes cuz we live in a jungle
you said it yourself

Shit I forgot about the atlantes, good catch. There were so many empires that most of them are forgotten.

Ancient european tribes mastered iron making and horseriding for example while american tribes always remained stone age people

????
How?
The North American natives never really built great cities or developed much beyond hunting and gathering.

I will say that I thoroughly enjoy the philosophy of many of the Northern American tribes though. Pretty harmonious imo. Central and South American Natives were violent fuckers.

I think you are forgetting the gold.
Incas and Mayans had control over it, there was just no source for iron