Tfw there will never be an enitirely different genre of music created ever again

>tfw there will never be an enitirely different genre of music created ever again
>tfw we are unironically witnessing the autumn years of music as a form of artistic expression

after winter, there is spring

given the current level of technological advancement in our society, not only will there be new forms of music, there will be new forms of music that you cannot even conceive of yet.

assuming of course we make it that far.

change it comes.... eventually

Technology doesn't make "new sounds" possible. Innovation is a meme.

...

yes it does. how can you argue that it doesn't? the creation of new instruments means new timbres and therefore different compositions taking advantage of said timbres. there are entire genres dedicated to a very narrow set of sounds from a narrow set of instruments. all of which were invented.

That's not how sound works.

Came here to post this

good argument.

Music isn't about immediate sound. It has no meaning without the culture it exists within. So as long as people continue to adapt and the world continues to change, music will stay relevant and interesting.

well deserved kek

Fuck off and delete this thread immediately.

...

Imagine being such a brainlet that you can't read a simple wall of text. I fear the day you will have to read War and Peace.

>the day you will have to read War and Peace.
What day is that user? Is a masked gunman going to break into my house and force me to read War and Peace at gunpoint?

Thank god. We can stop with pointless "innovation" and exhibitionism and perfect the genres that already exist.

You can already create any timbre with computers.
And timbre is completely irrelevant, really. This sort thinking where everything in music revolves around timbre is mindnumbingly stupid, it is used by musically illiterate people who don't know shit about harmony or polyphony or rhythm or anything else. Their idea of innovation is taking an existing genre and distorting its sound or slowing it down or speeding it up. Add an affix to the old genre or make up a compound noun and - viola - you have a new genre!

As long as Kanye is alive, the dream is alive

For all my Southside niggas that know me best
I feel like me and Taylor might still have sex
Why? I made that bitch famous (Goddamn)
I made that bitch famous
For all the girls that got dick from Kanye West
If you see 'em in the streets give 'em Kanye's best
Why? They mad they ain't famous (Goddamn)

i mean you should read it its a great book
perfecting the same thing over and over again inevitably leads to stagnation. there's a reason why new instruments, techniques, and technologies have resulted in new ways in which music can take shape. your line of thinking implies that the creation of the violin had no ultimate impact on music, which is so fucking retarded i don't even know where to begin with it. listing out a bunch of music theory terms isn't an argument.

>implying post-hop won't be the tightest shit in the world
Give it a few years, it's gonna happen somehow

Things with that preoccupation on timbre and technological development are what ends up sounding cheesy and dated. Djent, new wave, brostep, etc.

>Kraftwerk, Faust, Bernard Parmegiani, Can, Stockhausen, Brian Eno, are all cheesy and dated

k whatever jerk off over the same shit over and over for all i care

nobody cares about dumb nigger genres, we want real music

>Technology doesn't make "new sounds" possible
it literally does

Yes all that shit is cheesy and dated.

To say that is to misunderstand the physicality of sound. Technology only does the same things in a more expedient way.

>reading obsolete cracker books
lmfao bruh

no