Is this an 10/10

...

Other urls found in this thread:

rbt.asia/mu/thread/75607411/#75608652
twitter.com/AnonBabble

nah

Ratings are subjective. It's a 10/10 if it sounds perfect/is among the greatest things you have heard of, and there'd be nothing wrong with that

correct

Three Cheers is 10/10.

>MCR

>subjective

Welcome to the Black Parade, Famous Last Words, Mama and Disenchanted are, unironically, 10/10 tracks.

I give it a 7/10

>he believes his taste is objectively the best one ever
People like whatever music connects with them. Stop being a pretentious asshat

Gotta love when retards proudly step into a thread to announce that opinions are subjective. What a fucking champion of the people you are. A real beacon of light in the darkness, lmao.

Based.

here's an objective opinion:
Tripfags are cancer

Don't mouth off to your superiors.

>he needs attention on an anonymous Taiwanese Shrimping Forum
>he thinks he's superior to me
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Are opinions not subjective? Does your favorite album actually suck? Is this what Sup Forums does to the mind?

yeah
great album
great lyrics
great band
10/10 easily

is this reddit

I am better than you. Accept it, internalize it, embrace it.

Reading comprehension. Analysis is always subjective because analysis requires a subjective interpreter. Subjectivity is NEVER relevant in music discussions. Ever. The only time someone implies otherwise is if they're blatantly trolling by saying they have objective opinions or being a pathetic weakling by cowering behind "th-that's subjective!" so that they never need to have an honest critical thought about something.

Needless to say, MCR fans need to fuck right off. Literally go to Reddit to talk about shit like that.

mcr is tumblr

we go by a 12 point scale here at Sup Forums™

HEY LOOK GAIZ I'M SO COOL I AHVE A TRIP NAO

All hail to our lord

"Ironic" shitposting is just shitposting.

>he keeps having to change the STOP picture's name so he can keep posting it cause he doesn't have the mental capacity to use a different image
HAHAHAHAHAHA

I have dozens of these, just so you know.

Hi there!
You seem to have made a bit of a mistake in your post. Luckily, the users of Sup Forums are always willing to help you clear this problem right up! You appear to have used a tripcode when posting, but your identity has nothing at all to do with the conversation! Whoops! You should always remember to stop using your tripcode when the thread it was used for is gone, unless another one is started! Posting with a tripcode when it isn't necessary is poor form. You should always try to post anonymously, unless your identity is absolutely vital to the post that you're making!
Now, there's no need to thank me - I'm just doing my bit to help you get used to the anonymous image-board culture!

Counterattack, bro.

You dare use my pictures against me ? You are nothing.

>trips being this butthurt
I can’t wait until Sup Forums is filled with MCR and Paramore fans desu.

Get the absolute hell out with your superficially superior "Stop" signs. You're not original, you're not intelligent, RHCP is not pop rock and The Black Parade is objectively a 0/10. Kill yourself, Faggolio.

_________________________________________
This line officially bans all tripfags from existence.

Yo I think you forgot something

You can't stop the truth. Take your shit back to Tumblr, Reddit, 9GAG, anywhere. I don't care where, just not here. Stop infesting this board with your garbage.

how many pictures of stop signs do you have

...

Yes

Holy Shit these stop sighs are multiplaying.
Ok I have a plan

...

End your filthy existence immediately, degenerate scum. Your elitism will never stop us from invading this board, and I will see to it that your shitty, failed attempts at "music" will be evaporated from the face of this Earth. Face it, retarded oldfag. The future is now. New will always be better than archaic mentality, and reconsiderations for albums will prevail in this board. You can't live forever here. You have to go sometime, and we have to take your place. It's the cycle of freshness, nigger.

>You can't live forever here. You have to go sometime
Wiser shitposters than you said this to me a decade ago, and look where we are now.

post a blue one next

Why limit music discussion to just objective criteria? That sounds dull.

Let's just end the feud.

go will win

Reading comprehension.

Can't stop the STOP.

Yield, my friend. Opinions are subjective. That's what the dictionary definition will probably say, or perhaps articles regarding opinions. What you think of a certain album is not destined to be the truth; it's just how you feel about it.

WTF I leave for an hour and there are signs everywhere.
I just wanted an opinion on the album, not a civil war

>Analysis is always subjective because analysis requires a subjective interpreter.

Can you not analyze music based on objective criteria, like chord progression, metric, etc?

what are you guys even arguing about

It's a 10/10 chance I'm not listening to this shit

>Opinions are subjective.
Yeah, that's the point. That's why I'm continually saying "reading comprehension." You're too dumb to understand that you already agree with what I'm saying.

The act of analyzing them as part of "music" makes it subjective. Once you label the physical properties in an attempt to use them to discuss the art, their physical nature stops being relevant because you are analyzing them in a subjective context.

I'm waiting patiently for people to realize that they already agree with what I'm saying.

Yep. You're now getting sieged by Sup Forums while all of your Sup Forumscore albums fall into a meaningless fate of obscurity. I'm glad this site has now been exposed for the feminine, cuck-laden place it always has been, and that nu-male faggots like you fall under the curses of buzzwords. Soon, it will all end for you. You're trapped near the end of the cliff, and all you have left is the spiky pits where your blood lays. Can you fly yet, faggot? Or are your wings cut by the nooses?
We hope that you choke, kicking squealing Gucci little piggy. Kill yourself, Sarah. You don't belong here, and we'll enjoy when your insides fall to pieces. You're living in a fantasy of you believe your mentally deficient kin will still live by the end of the year. Crazium is already dead. Ocean Man is now a desert. And you're just an enemy.

Insert your meaningless words here.

>had to make a new trip because everyone was filtering him
How sad

I give up you are right let's talk about the album

PS this is not an imposter

So a studied review of the elements of a piece of music, without any sort of bias and in a neutral point of view, isn't an analysis?

Hey guys, I think we finally reached pick retardation!

You're know this is Sup Forums right.

You know youre an idiot, right?

You know that's not Friendo, right?

As if the actual Friendo is any less obnoxious

Tripcodes keep order. Frankly we should also have some sort of "scoring" system so we all have some way of knowing what posts we disagree with. How do I downvote this?

I mean I think it's a solid album. Most people who project that MCR sucks, when asked, can only give the reason, "They just do" which is iFunny levels of retardation. It's never "the lyrics suck" or "Gerard's voice is annoying," nothing with any sort of reason to it. It's just "They're MCR, therefore bad"

>iFunny
Literally who?

NOW I KNOW

Tell me man, that happened to your sense of humour
If you want to let out steam just watch some porn or something.

>So [shit you never said]
FRIENDO TIP: Starting a sentence with "So," is an indicator that you're about to straw man the hell out of what I just said.
Analyzing "music" is intrinsically subjective because you are applying the subjective label of music from the outset and working within those subjective goalposts.

I have roughly one dozen !///// template tripcodes. You can try to filter me, but it will not work forever.

Not sure what you're rambling about. Have fun.

THAT I CAN'T MAKE YOU STAY

THAT I CAN'T MAKE YOU STAY

BUT WHERE'S YOUR HEART?

You're not funny. How many peoply have to tell you this before you get it?

BUT WHERE'S YOUR HEART?

BUT WHERE'S YOUR-

AND I KNOW

THERE'S NOTHING I CAN SAY

I'm having a bit of difficulty following you. It's the label of "music" which causes the analysis to be subjective? Isn't what is or isn't music rather objective?

Also if you were a bit nicer to people, maybe you wouldn't need so many tripcodes.

we really need to gas these "pleb and proud" types

TO CHANGE THAT PART

>when you single-handedly reduce a thread to incoherent shitposting of middle school diary entries
dohoho

It's subjective because you're applying the subjective label of "music" and then attempting to subjectively evaluate the subjective quality of this (subjective) music.
>Isn't what is or isn't music rather objective?
Did you just skip the entire last century of music history or what ?

Seriously.

>the entire last century of music history
Sorry, amend that to:
>the entire last two centuries of linguistic developments, music history, and general philosophy

I see. Now, under the subjective label of music, do you agree that an objective explanation of it's use of theory (with neutral bias, as said before) is possible? If so, would that count as an analysis?

Three Cheers was better

>do you agree that an objective explanation of it's use of theory
Are we perhaps presupposing that theory is an objective quality of the physical properties instead of a mutually-agreed upon subjective interpretation of the relationship between those properties ? Hmm ?

Autism.

An example: your subjective interpretation of "autism" appears to be "people who win arguments on the internet."
Do you see how this applies to the conversation ?

Bullets is better.

TBP is better.

Well, if you put it that way, it is mutually agreed upon.

However, theory is a very well established school of thought, therefore, one can objectively measure works against it's parameters.

Not me, by the way.

And you think having the last word = winning an argument. Grow up man

The theory wouldn't exist without someone to hold the ideas of "theory" in the first place. It's a subjective human creation that is generally agreed upon by other humans making the subjective value-judgement that it's a (subjectively) good way to analyze a (subjective) piece of music.
I don't think we're operating on the same definition of objectivity here. I'm pretty sure I've said all that I can without continually repeating myself and if you still disagree then I'll just leave it at that.

Danger Days is better. Truly the patrician's choice.

I agree with you for the most part. I'm just saying that analyses can objectively align with the principles of a subjective school of thought. Especially one as well established and universal as music theory.

Do you have a RYM? Or a chart?

Who are you quoting?

I think I understand. Your understanding of objectivity differs from mine; while I am using it philosophically in the sense that anything which does not exist outside of the mind is not an objective phenomena, you are using it in the sense of an impartial observation. While I also don't believe that to exist, I at least understand your understanding.

>Do you have a RYM? Or a chart?
No, I don't have a real use for them any more. The best I can give you is an old copypasta list
rbt.asia/mu/thread/75607411/#75608652
happy trails~