Post liberals being retarded

Post liberals being retarded

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=bmSzgvaJCn0
youtube.com/watch?v=C5mku6s7vOI
youtube.com/watch?v=iARHCxAMAO0
youtube.com/watch?v=w_23z9yJAq0
youtube.com/watch?v=YxHGMvrwa7U
youtube.com/watch?v=CTOoYxOf92s
youtube.com/watch?v=4r7cwWegXCU
youtube.com/watch?v=avep_1vbUOA
youtube.com/watch?v=A_JPcBwYGmo
youtube.com/watch?v=Ufk7IXdxc-c
youtube.com/watch?v=lVTE37FNJSU
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>all regulations are bad

Go live in China if you want to see what a lack of regulations (and lack of enforcement of regulations) does.

...

No one really thinks all regulations are bad, but generally less is better.

China did average 10% GDP growth per year for a few decades though.

>Go live in a communist country if you want to see how badly we need government regulation

I always knew leafs were the worst shitposters

Facebook
Twitter

I always knew Americans were ignorant about other countries.

>implying people having less and less control over their own lives is a bug and not a feature
The plutocrats that run both parties know exactly what they're doing. Any step toward back toward defacto neo-mercantilism is a step toward them ingratiating themselves the levers of control for generations to come.

Glass-Steagall was a regulation. WAS. How'd that go?

Fucking libertarians.

That's because they illegitimately inflated their GDP with currency manipulation.

>unregulated capitalism
>ever being a good thing

Why are libertarians so retarded? Like the USSR is an example of socialism or communism (like you like to point out all the time) every example of less regulated capitalism ends with child labor and private armies.

forgot my photo

>China
>communist
hello grandpa

That free-market paradise, China.

whats wrog with private armies?

they may not be communist but the power the goverment has is disgusting
look at what they did to their stock market and don't try to use the great depression as a counter argument, that was all the FED

They're the ones responsible for all these false flags and secret wars

slavery and child labor are matters of morals not economics

the mossad is private?

no he's just an idiot spouting retarded statement

>implying regulations are bad

shoo shoo libertarian faggot.

How are you dividing them?

Business in the west already lobbied to eliminate export tariffs just so they could have products assembled in developing countries to cut the cost of labor. Is that not immoral? They don't care about how they're affecting quality of life. Absolutely anything they can do to increase profits becomes the goal.

...

So edgy. How's summer school?

the edge never stop

That beautiful place with no environmental regulation

our governments are responsible for those, actually. don't be naive.

I was trying to talk to this guy about trump, but he's a fag and couldn't handle it, so he blocked me.

...

>photo

I don't get that argument anymore since you get a tax write-off for charitable donations. And that isn't even monetary. You can donate old fucking rotten clothes and pay less in taxes for it.

>Giving a handful of central planners total control of the means of production is the same thing as letting people who want to donate do so

>liberal retard that can only deal in extremes

Socialists sure are fucking retarded if they think poverty is fixed by giving them money.

>Weeb calling other Weeb retearded

thats why i am a libertyaryan

There needs to be the threat of violence to discourage immoral business practices. Finger wagging doesn't disincentivize anyone.

I'm anti-neoliberal but it's pretty easy to argue that sweatshops are just part of the progression of liberalization. The guided age was a horrible time for most Americans. Today is a horrible time for a lot of Asians/Latin Americans/Africans. We're already seen outsourcing move out of India as they modernize, I think all those other places will follow and outsourcing will move to even less developed places.

There will also be a group of people that wish to subjugate another group. This is why we need rule of law that takes into account morals.,

Logic 1
Libtertarians 0

Checkmate, angsty teens.

dude we had a civil war and riots over both issues
i don't get what you're saying

Ah yes, good old Laissez-faire China

Here's a couple of videos

youtube.com/watch?v=bmSzgvaJCn0

youtube.com/watch?v=C5mku6s7vOI

youtube.com/watch?v=iARHCxAMAO0

youtube.com/watch?v=w_23z9yJAq0

youtube.com/watch?v=YxHGMvrwa7U

youtube.com/watch?v=CTOoYxOf92s

youtube.com/watch?v=4r7cwWegXCU

pol classic

youtube.com/watch?v=avep_1vbUOA

youtube.com/watch?v=A_JPcBwYGmo

youtube.com/watch?v=Ufk7IXdxc-c

youtube.com/watch?v=lVTE37FNJSU

I have more videos but that should keep you entertained for a while.

Slavery was part of the law dipshit.

...the slaves weren't free until the law was changed

In terms of lack of establishing a standard for labor practices and environmental protection they are pretty good Laissez-faire.

>ITT people will conflate liberals with leftists

It wouldn't be very hard for Koch Industries to set up a system of exploitation akin to slavery if all regulation were to suddenly disappear. Monsanto already does this with their seed rental program in Latin America and India

farmers hate gmo seeds, they have publicly come out against it
but since the goverment has so much control they shove down their throats

Monsanto/all the other multinationals have control of the governments via the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. Through those "government" agencies the multinationals shoehorn legislation favorable to them.

Law established property rights.

It took government to say you could own another person.

Without government you couldn't own someone, you would have to hold them captive by force.

You are just another government worshipper. All good comes from the almighty regulations.

so you agree goverment is shit?

I'd rather live under a government than in the wild where I could be killed/exploitated at any moment. When a government becomes too overbearing and begins to do exactly what it was supposed to protect me from then I have a problem.

You can easily exploit people with and without government. You dove right into the semantics of ownership, a topic irrelevant to the concept of exploitation.

I like regulation because it prevents some people from trampling over others.

I've been to China. They do have environmental regs, but the authorities choose when and where they enforce them.

It's actually a beautiful country. Pity it's full of yellow kikes.

>regulation
Slavery was regulated also

To make a blanket statement "I like regulations" implies they are all good and necessary.

Regulations are equally capable of enslaving people.
Regulations enable people to trample others.

Because they based theirs on building and the country is full of empty cities.

You're being pretty pedantic. Read my reply to the other guy in that post and you'll understand the extent of my appreciation for regulation.

Fuck off /leftypol/
You both need to be gassed.

CHECKED

What's your economic stance then?

Every single person involved in this picture except for Trump himself should be gassed.

...

Wow I'm a shill for hill now

>thinks giving a handful of central planners total control of the means of production is socialism
>actually has the gall to publicly make statements about socialism

Strong indapandant femon meets Religion of peace

Why did you even engage him? Their replies are common and predictable, bro. You didn't even have your Trump talking points. Gotta be prepared if you're gonna argue in the internet
Don't move with the conversation until they've answered your questions sufficiently.
>how will Mexico pay for the wall?
Remittances
Anyway, if they're like this, it might be better to use humour instead with reverse-psychology

Pic related perfectly expresses the liberal bind on the third world.

>oppose things third worlders do in abundance
>hold third world culture as sacrosanct
>cry whenever they're given burgers

Reminder that they voluntarily take on western capitalism and benefit greatly from it, "preserving native culture" just means maintaining a world zoo so guilty whites can feel good about diversity and shit.

These bitches are always kinda good-looking.
So the question is: are they *paid* activists?
I know paid activism is a thing. Some people do it professionally.

The question is: who is giving them their shills?

Femen are Soros funded.

The way you fucking morons talk makes me want to neck myself, fucking 12 year olds trying to be edgy.