Will MLS ever get rid of their communist socialist contract system?

Will MLS ever get rid of their communist socialist contract system?

Other urls found in this thread:

hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/leagues/seasons/teams/0017871988.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>worst teams get best players next season
who even came up with this shit

>communist socialist contract system
implying that this is something bad :^)

Stalin Marx and Lenin.

>M L S
wew

If it was a realistic communist socialist system all the good players would go to just one team called FCPolitburo and the rest would be equally worthless.
Kind of like Bundesliga.

>Spain making fun of Bundesliga for power concentration
That's a joke, right?

> team with most Arab/Chink money just buys the best players

who even came up with this shit

probably not, since it's based on NFL/NBA/etc. and clappers will get twitchy and start screaming about anti-americanism if you even think about tampering with those TV series I mean sports leagues

oooh yes, totally unlike la liga right?
LOL

american soccer had a bunch of other league systems before and all of them failed. MLS is doing something right.

oh my days blud

The American system is more honest if you think about it. At least they don't keep up the pretension that fooball is still about sports. It is all about entertainment and their system supports that.

this.
Salary cap is implemented in current MLS to avoid its collapse. Right now it's pretty weak and fragile, doesn't get big TV income.
When their league has more solid finances, they'll get rid of it to get more valuable players.

Teams that can win La Liga:
>Madrid
>Barca
>Atletico
>Sevilla on a fluke

Teams that can win Bundesliga
>Bayern
>Dortmund on a fluke

Le 5 wins in a row league is speaking now
La Liga has two powerful teams monkey

Madrid=Buyern
Barça was able to win thanks to a golden generation never seen at this level, it will soon become again irrelevant. Also Barça doesn't have near the income level of Madrid, they have to renovate their huge stadium
Atlético won on a fluke, already collapsing

La Liga had* two powerful teams

I appreciate the sentiment, but communism and socialism are two different things, on opposite sides of the political spectrum.

But you knew that, didn't you, Helmut?

lol this is what halal fags believe

>communism and socialism are two different things, on opposite sides of the political spectrum.
wut, don't tell me you are actually one of the retarded Amerifats who thinks socialism is when the state does stuff.

what's your definition of socialism then, Adolf

anything that takes my money against my will to give it to starving browns in socialism

what if it gives it to starving whites

that's okay then

Read Socialism: Utopian and Scientific

Based America

>on opposite sides of the political spectrum
You are a fucking dumbass
Socialism is the previous step of comunism
"Socialism goal is comunism" - Lenin

The state owning and doing stuff has been the norm for millenia and it wasn't fucking socialism.
If you want to give it a name call it state economy or publicism or whatever.
Socialism is when workers own the means of production (meaning factories and farms)
Comunism is what happens after a succesful world socialist state disolves itself
Then you have a classless and STATELESS society
The USSR was socialist, not comunist, they were still commies and the ruling party was the comunist party but it was socialist cause it was still a state, simple as that.
This is what commies mean by "never been tried"
Of course if we ever had one single socialist world goberment it would never disolve itself to create comunism with the excuse of preventing nations and capitalism to rise anew.
Comunism is the promise of a stateless society created after a giant state controlling every aspect of life.
What commies will tell you is that after the socialist state has educated (brainwash) every man, the comunist stateless world will be possible.
Of course, even if they would have the power to control the brains of every man into not forming capitalism and states after the socialist state has disolved, they would not be able to control the thinking of the future peple born after those that lived in the previous system and suffered the brainwashing have died.
Without a socialist goberment shuting down freethinking, capitalism and states would appear.
So the promise of a stateless, classless society has always been a big fucking lie.

So because (((Lenin))) said it, it's true purely because he identified as a (((Communist)))?
I very much doubt Hitler had plans for National Socialism to "evolve" into (((Communism))). Or is that explained away by Hitler's Socialism not being (((Marxian Socialism))). In which case you would have to admit that Socialism and (((Communism))) are two separate things and Socialism isn't just a rung on the (((Communist))) ladder. Unless you're saying that the staunchly anti-(((Communist))) National Socialists were actually (((Communist))) all along and masqueraded as hating them just so a war could be concocted to destroy National Socialism in order to make everyone (((Communist))), because that makes perfect sense.

>If you want to give it a name call it state economy or publicism or whatever.

Why? Call it what it is now, Socialism. The problem with you young bucks is that you think actions are defined by the name they're given and not vice-versa. Only an 18 year old who fought for Hillary Clinton and demands open borders (except for Israel) could think by applying a name to themselves, say 'anti-(((establishment)))', that it makes it true.
Also for the most part, especially anything close to "millennia", was more Serfdom than anything resembling Socialism.
I mean your overall premise is the right one, (((Communism))) is literally impossible and will never happen (certainly not when you have the mixing of the races etc), but pretending (((Communism))) has never been tried because it wasn't this very specific type of (((Communism))) is moronic.

>(((Communism))) is literally impossible and will never happen (certainly not when you have the mixing of the races etc)

>the mixing of the races etc

I'm going to print this quote and hang it on the wall

No offense but I think that you already wanted to make that reply without even trying to understand what I was saying first

>I very much doubt Hitler had plans for National Socialism to "evolve" into (((Communism)))
national socialism is a separated political ideology than socialism as understood by the majority of the population
Lenin said comunism is the socialist goal, he didn't say comunism is the national socialist goal
>and Socialism isn't just a rung on the (((Communist))) ladder
It's been that way for every socialist party that ruled a piece of earth.
It doesn't matter if they suceeded or not, or if they even tried that, for them, ideologically, what they were building was world socialism to have world comunism in the future.
Of course, some nations just used socialism and comunism as a means to control their plebs to gain independence from colonial powers but that's a diferent topic.
And yes, comunism has not been tried as no stablished socialist state has disolved itself and it has lead to comunism.
Commies in charge of nations, however, has been tried, and they've made socialism and once their socialist states have collapsed capitalism and nations have born again so there's no need to try it further, that's what I mean.

Why do you even bother to discuss something with anglos? They are just polishing their Sup Forumsfu

I'm pol too nigger

Using Sup Forums doesn't automatically make you a Sup Forumstard

we tried the no salary cap thing about 40 years ago and the league went bankrupt. it was called NASL

>where's my honorable one good team funded by a dictator league?

made me think

>V.I. Lenin as a reliable source for anything

My bad, forgot what website I was on.

>Sup Forums talking about politics

Don't embarrass yourselves. Know your fucking place.

>done to keep the owners competitive and those who earn the money weak
>communist

Precisely

>ctrl+f parity
>no results

You guys are all retards. The MLS doesn't want to be like the eurooean leagues where it's always a 2-4 team competition. They want all of their franchises to be relatively competitive

Yeah unlike in Yurostan where there's literally nothing to do but watch the same team win the same sport every single year, in America we have this magical concept of "multiple pro sports leagues" where businesses have to compete with each other to get viewers. The worst teams need a chance to get good to make the sport interesting, otherwise people will just watch any of the other 4 major sports in America. Across the pond they don't understand that concept. They let Arabs buy championships every season because what the fuck else are they gonna watch? Cricket? lol

yeah they want to have parity like the NBA and the NFL

Spain is right

hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/leagues/seasons/teams/0017871988.html

>mogilny
>bure
>fedorov
>makarov
>fetisov
>larionov
>konsantinov

By pure coincidence, CSKA's reign at the top of the Russian league ended the minute that Russian players start to defect to the NHL

>don't talk about lenin to talk about comunism
ok dumbass

i find it hilarious that muh american dog eat dog capitalists, embraces the "everyones equal socialist model" so much in sports.

I mean i guess the idea is okay on paper, but come on; just let the money flow, MLS could potentially be the next Premier League due to America's relative strong econmy. I doubt you'd end up as Spain and Itality one - two club leagues.

PL is better than ever now, yes you have your ridiculous money whores; chelsea, manchester city, manchester united (and Arsenal to some degree), but then you also have tons of competitive teams after that can and WILL win silverware; Liverpool, Spurs, Everton, Stoke, Watford, Newcastle, Bromwich, Leicster

the premier league is not a good model for anyone who isn't rich as fuck

sure you can shitpost about "muh best league in the world" on Sup Forums but you're doing that instead of being able to afford to go to games or even be able to afford to watch them on tv

I literally

can not believe

how afraid

everyone is getting of MLS

'n-n-n-o im n-n-not a c-c-c-cuck'

To be fair, I think most Americans probably can't afford to go to NFL games either.

what about mls?

In fact, NFL games (Patriots, best seats are $195, worst $75) are like 3x as expensive as EPL games (United, best seats 53 pounds, worst 31 pounds). MLS tickets bottom out at $12, and go up like $275 (NYCFC), but that's not exactly a fair comparison because MLS isn't the main sport in the country.

>United, best seats 53 pounds, worst 31 pounds
im almost certain this isn't right to be honest

in any case i was comparing the premier league to pre-premier league football in england, idk much about the nfl but im certainly not arguing for a more nfl-approach in this country.

And that is called communism. Rob the rich and succesful teams to pay welfare gimmedats to the bums and losers.

I'm so dissapointed with America.

Socialism is good for billionaires, our sports system will never change.

Fuck socialized programs for everyone else, this is America!

>goes to /mls/ thread to cheer on loons
>sees discussion on economic policy

wut

>Europe is so socialist and collective
>No salary caps in sports
>Super teams dominate the league

>America is super capitalist
>Sports are socialist and fair
>Every team with good enough managing and coaching can have a chance

What the fuck?