Tell me how the government can't just ban guns and come and take them?

Tell me how the government can't just ban guns and come and take them?

You really think the American people will fight back against the biggest, most funded military in the world?

They don't need a ruse or false flags.

Other urls found in this thread:

fox13news.com/news/local-news/28623345-story
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Very effective argument.. I guess the same could be said about rounding up undocumented immigrants.
> feels good

>the biggest, most funded military in the world?
those aren't going to be the guys going door to door.

This is either shitty bait, or OP's 'tarded.

>military gets orders to disarm the public
>they say no

...

Yes, but those undocumented immigrants are part of their plan.

Why would they say no?

>government goes into to take guns from law abiding people, to prevent people from dying.
>the government ends up killing people and the people end up killing some of the governments forces.
I thought you anti gun folks were trying to prevent gun deaths?

American gun owners outnumber the American army 100 to 1.

Tell me how the government can't just ban Muslims and come and take them?

You really think the American people will fight back against the biggest, most funded military in the world?

They don't need a ruse or false flags.

because they will be shot if they do
a tank or a jet or a drone cannot come into your home and confiscate your weapons

cause guns are a big part of the American economy

Just look up the registered republicans in the military. Its almost all of them.

Maybe i'm naive, but I have a feeling almost no one would fight back against the military.

I think you guys severely overestimate how much people would kill to keep their guns.

Why would they want to get rid of one of their biggest tools?

So, your suggestion is for the military to begin policing America?

>obvious footfag porn

Because they're afraid of being shot

You don't think it'll happen at some point?

They're going to try and take away guns from citizens, it's inevitable.

>Why would they say no?
You do realize that the military is composed of US citizens that all swore an oath to defend the constitution, right? Disarming the public would also take their rights away.

Even if you had some elements of the military following the order, you'd also have many opposing it. It would be a total disaster, which is why they would never even attempt to do it that way.

Yeah I don't know how they can hope to win when they're outnumbered 100 to 1.

Ok, so the military becomes a domestic police force and then confiscate all the guns.
Then what?

>HEY SOLDIER MAN, YOU SHOULD SHOOT YOUR FAMILY... I MEAN ITS AN ORDER... YOU HAVE TO DO IT... RIGHT? XD

>Tell me how the government can't just ban guns and come and take them?
How would they enforce the ban?
With guns? no, they just banned them.
With spears and swords? Against people with guns? hahaha no.

Let's talk about this then
>The government couldn't even defeat a few thousand ragheads in the middle east, there are 100 million gun owners in the US
>They would be fighting against the very people they are counting on to support their economy
>Should war break out against their fellow Americans, people would be throwing wrenches into the gears all along the supply chain.
>Large sections of the military would fight with the resistance

Not to mention large powers such as Russia have openly declared they will support any American secessionist movement

The government looks powerful, and they like to project that image. But their power rests on the cooperation of the people. They are actually holding it together by a thread

The US military will not fight their own. Ever.

Source: I'm a vet.

Part of the liberal plan to pad the ballot boxes.
So all sarcasm aside,
The military isn't allowed to police the states United.
> Unconstitutional

They would have to declare martial law

And after the Orlando shooting and he hoops the administration is jumping though to get all the "political tastemakers" from the limousine liberal set, to control the Orlando narrative.

Losing the 2nd amendment to most Americans is losing our country.

That's a fact

>Disarming the public would also take their rights away.

You act as if the government cares about rights.

We become the ants and they wield the world's biggest magnifying glass.

if it could be done, it would have been done.
check mate
debate me retards

>Losing the 2nd amendment to most Americans is losing our country.

>That's a fact


You think so? I mean, I hope it's that way, but maybe I just don't give the average Joe any credit. The American mass populous seems so lazy and lacking of ethics that they'd just turn over and show their bellies at the slightest hint of opposition.

Pretty much this.
Every enlisted man I've served with in almost ten years now would desert or mutiny. All enemies foreign and domestic

Think so?

>You act as if the government cares about rights.
no I think he means the soldiers care about rights.

>We become the ants and they wield the world's biggest magnifying glass.
So the suggestion then is to destroy the country to confiscate grand pappy's shot gun.
Amazing plan.

Have fun with your numbers advantage when they drop a nuke on you.

The military of 2016 is a hell of a lot more PC my friend
The old guard is gone, 400 pound feminazis are your Colonels now

Losing 2 would signal to all that we must revolt. Must revolt, tyranny would be unmasked

I'm pretty sure the 2.3+ million members of the US military care about rights. It's not like they all magically become soulless politicians when they enlist.

If it gets to that point we are pretty much dead anyway? So whats their to lose? If they are willing to take that final step, their isn't much else they won't do? And Most of the Miltary guys I am on terms with have stated that is the one order they won't comply with, same with my local law enforcement. God I love being in a Red State.

The military is made up of citizens, law enforcement is made up of citizens, the entire fucking government is made up of citizens. Do you know how many people would have to go crazy to allow the checks and balances of the Constitution to be ignored? Probably about 50.1% of them.

That must be a weird sort of cognitive dissonance. On one hand, you're there to serve the government and the people of the US, but you're also tied to your fellow militia.

Would they really fight their own?


>So the suggestion then is to destroy the country

The Jews are already doing that.

Horseshit.
Source: 800+ confirmed kills, gorilla warfare, etc.

Try harder OP

Many people don't want to lose guns, government would be seen as illegitimate (more so than already is).

Americans dropping nukes on American soil? Meh uh wha huh?
Wouldn't happen.,
Hurr durr let's drop a nuke to get rid of guns........ ......

you're not too clever...

Kent State will happen again for sure, but it won't happen more than a few times before people start to realize they're on the wrong side.

You need bigger bait...

you've never read Madison's Federalist Papers

MY roommate is in the army

He says he's sworn to defend the lives of the American people, and that going against them and violating the constitution would be, as he put it, "Completely back asswards"

I don't know how hardcore the US military's indoctrination is but from the point of view of a conscripting country it seems like an impossibility.

> #
>Maybe i'm naive, but I have a feeling almost no one would fight back against the military. I think you guys severely overestimate how much people would kill to keep their guns.
>no one would die for their rights
Have you even talked to a gun fag before or even redneck, hillbillies, desert dwellers, or back water people either for that matter? There would be MILLIONS of people who would rather die with their guns in their hands covered in their and other's blood beforebefore they'd hand them over.

>pic absolutely related

Of course they can user! Have you not meet lieutenant fighter jet?

>Have you even talked to a gun fag before or even redneck, hillbillies, desert dwellers, or back water people either for that matter? There would be MILLIONS of people who would rather die with their guns in their hands covered in their and other's blood before they'd hand them over.


And see? This is the original American spirit. I just hope it's not gone by the wayside because from what I can tell, pretty much all liberals want guns abolished.

>sworn to defend the lives ...
can we really trust what a retard flunkee swears to?

U.S conscripts millions, they revolt and take over government.

>that going against them and violating the constitution would be, as he put it, "Completely back asswards"


What if they changed the constitution?

I agree with him 100%, but there do you draw the line? What if they change it so much to where Muslims have free reign? Would he still defend it?

You think America will nuke it's own cities?

>wah wah guns

don't care
just came to look at girl
now i want to cum on her feet

have you not heard the latest liberal shitpost argument?
"what good are muh pistols an rifles against DRONE strikes??"

these shitheads are marching straight into wwIII and they don't even realize it. maybe when a boot is on their face

No, those people don't have the majority of the guns. It will be the backwoods rednecks that get the nukes.

>1/3 of the US owns a gun
Good luck attacking over 100 million people with an unsympathetic military of 1 million and little to no law enforcement suport.

You must be at least eighteen (18) years old to post here.

>little to no law enforcement suport.


I wonder how cops feel about gun laws.

>You really think the American people will fight back against the biggest, most funded military in the world?
It's maintained by the private industry and without that it wouldn't last a week.

...

lol

>wanting the government to use nukes against its own population

What is wrong with you?

Thank you.

So the military will use their bigger scarier guns to take away the big scary guns that private citizens have.

Guns sure are an effective deterrent.

But only the military and police force, whom the Libs hate, should have guns.
My god man.

If the military began operation ballistic freedom (america the safe space)

This country would be in s state of bedlam unlike any you have seen.

Mobilization would take time. Twitter seems to be a more effective communication tool than ye ol squawk box.
But yes they could cut off Internet, but then we got the Hamms,
.. And I don't think GI Joe is gonna want someone securing his hometown, killing his friends and family

Damn, based cops are based.

Depends on the cop. Don't know what the general consensus is, but my local sheriff wouldn't stand for it, and I have a feeling Arpaio and that black cop that's on fox all the time wouldn't either.

fox13news.com/news/local-news/28623345-story

WINTER HAVEN (FOX 13) - A day after a shooter orchestrated a massacre on an Oregon community college Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd says gun control will not prevent incidents like it.

"There's 300 million guns in this country. The common denominator is mental health, not guns," said Judd.

>high school and college dropouts will kill their families, friends, and neighbors

US soldiers and the government are not always on the same fucking side you simple minded shit

It's not that I want it exactly, it's just a necessary evil to make sure the government remains in control.

You understand the military is made up of citizens who are probably the most pro-gun out of you all right?

Not a problem

I think it's both user

So, our military would revolt against our own government?

I would hope so.

You people are idiots. They won't take the guns. They will offer a buyback and stop making them. Time and pressure on the old salts tell they die off and their children will gladly sell them off.

Polk County bro here

When that happens the U.N. will free us from the "Oppressive regime". It wouldn't be a local issue when nukes drop, but an international issue.

How much fat does it take to stop a bullet?

Hmmmm if the gubment gonna gib me cash.. How much fink I'm Finna make on the black market? Oh I'm finna be Ritchie Rich Bitch!

That will be your new america,
Gun violence will spike violent crime will spike.
It'll be just as effective as the war on drugs..

>calls people idiots
>thinks (enforced) buy backs isn't a way of taking people's guns away
>clearly has no idea what he's talking about when he says 'they'll just stop making them hurr durr'

My local police had a statement saying they would arm the population if the US government got tyrannical. Small towns are the best towns.

Mine didn't go that far (though, with this being WV, passing out guns is a waste of time), but they did issue plenty of statements saying they'd openly resist any gun confiscation.

Leftist faggots often forget that the state only governs with the consent of the people.

You can almost forgive them for thinking that it's all powerful.

Post logged via Five Eyes/NSA

...

Retarded questions.

I'm pretty sure we were fighting against more than a few hundred farmers during the Vietnam War but I don't have the numbers in front of me.

Sup u ho.

As a sidenote: Grady Judd's argument against a recent open carry bill in Florida can be summed up as, "why would you give up the element of surprise?"

>He said to openly carry a firearm would make that person a prime target of the shooter, not a solution to the problem.

>Judd said the best way to treat an active shooter is for the owner of a concealed weapon — which the shooter would not see at first — to “shoot him right between the eyes or at least hold him at bay. That’s the only thing that’s going to keep you alive until we get there.”

I fail at thinking. The post.

LMAO, let's just irradiate most of the continents landmass just so we can still control it, surely that would be worth it!

Most military men are conservative. I can't tell you how sick my unit and battalion is of Obeezy.

We just got internet access this week at our FOB and I am fucking SHOCKED that that Orlando shooting (by a self proclaimed ISIS member) turned into a hit-piece on gun control. I didn't realize it until I got internet access, all the shit on international radio (our only real form of constant information) stressed the ISIS angle.

t. 0231

What country are you stationed at?
Post pic of gun so I can masturbate to it.

>the biggest, most funded military in the world?
funded by whom?

how long do you think a city will remain calm without food and electricity?

disrupting this is something that 100 men with guns can do. The onus of the US military would be to cover all possible attack and disruption points - for the entire US.

this isn't about conventional warfare, user

Because the vast majority of the US military is white . Especially so for enlisted. 90% of the black and Hispanics I've served with over the ten years have been mechanics and cooks.

>So the military will use their bigger scarier guns

what if......I mean for a second........just think about this for a second.........If you know.....if you killed the guy with the bigger gun and then you took it?

GENIUS!

Yeah true, I would hope that the almost 1.3 million active military and the some 877,000 reservists would not forsake their oaths to the people of America.

I would hope the well armed militia of over 100 million American citizens would wash away the tyranny