Sup Forums btfo by based asian

...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Hx23c84obwQ
twitter.com/AnonBabble

If she doesnt like our laws, then she can go back to her family's gook country.

>People tend to conveniently forget the "SHALL NOT BE INFINGED" part of the 2nd Amendment.

What does militia consist of? Oh yeah, civilians.

>A fucking Slant eyed cunt talking about another nations laws as if they were her own
How did we let it get to this? Fucking hell.

/thread

>ONE POST FROM THIS ID
ONE POST FROM THIS ID
>ONE POST FROM THIS ID

Jesus fuck people are getting trolled hard these last few days.

seriously, how much of a moron you have to be to not understand the 2nd amendment?? i know that reading the founding fathers' arguments for it would be difficult for like 95% of the retards in the states but there is literally no excuse to be this much of a retard.. you can at least read the amendment and understand it. it's like a single sentence..

sometime i really wish a 50 mile asteroid hit the planet soon..

YOU LOOK RARE

I'm the heller Decision the court said that the right to bear arms is an individual right regardless of militia membership, aka get fucked

youtube.com/watch?v=Hx23c84obwQ

hey cool running's,

how's that bobsleigh team going?

Is Jamaica rare? Are there not enough bobsledding threads?

"No freeman shall be debarred the use of arms within his own lands or tenements." Thomas Jefferson

While the Constitution of the United States was not signed by Jefferson, Jefferson is the one who certified the Bill of Rights which would, of course, include the 2nd Amendment.

Let's have the whole thing shall we?

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

In context this meant the people who wrote it allowed anything the military could own was available to all citizens.

Obviously tech has changed, citizens should not have access to bombs and such. But, where do we draw the line? Killing potential per minute sounds logical.

So, no automatics. K then. Done, we banned everything that needs banning.

People? Like the US Supreme Court time and time again?

Fuck off retard.

Worst part about these dumb threads, no better than the kind forbidden by the sticky, don't get deleted and in fact you get warned for reporting them. Utter cancer. Just remember to sage and hide.

I thought Asians were smart.
Also, maybe yellow rats who were culled by Maoism shouldn't be talking shit about an amendment that defends them against government tyranny.

>Obviously tech has changed, citizens should not have access to bombs and such

yes we should.

The national government can regulate local/state militias?

To me it seems they crammed 2 amendments into 1.

First part tells that a free state must have a militia.
Second part tells that citizen's right to have weapons is their birthright.

Well regulated meant well maintained at the time

There's well over a billion of them, so not all of them will be smart.

libs think they can solve all their problems with smugness

uncock your brow, gook

>A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

>the right of the people
NOT "THE RIGHT OF THE MILITIA"

Fucking savage bruh

great pic

The second amendment is worded the worst out of all original 10. Go read the other first 9 and then look at #2.

Yes. State needs militia, so PEOPLES right to bear arms shall not be infringed.

>"Regulate" always means "restrict," and always has, without exception. Even in this document that is explicitly denying the government the ability to legislatively restrict something.

The right to bears arms and a well regulated militia are exclusive if one another, the 2nd ammendment gives a right to both.

It's worded just right. It's not authors fault, that today's reader is borderline imbecile when it comes to comprehension.

Sage goes in options everyone.

Stop replying to these gook threads

People conveniently forgot that, "right of the people to keep and bear arms"
And
>"shall not be infringed." Fucking chink cunt thinking she is an american and should have a say.

1 post by this ID
1 post by this ID
1 post by this ID

...

I don't take advice on Constitutional law from laypeople. Ms. Lu is not a judge, an attorney, or a scholar. She writes fiction for young adults. Her opinion on Constitutional law is invalid, and it's quite arrogant of her to believe that she has any business commenting on such matters.

"A well balanced breakfast being necessary to the start of the day, the right of the People to keep and eat bacon shall not be infringed."

Does that mean that bacon must be banned or laws made to restrict it due to it not being "balanced" enough? No.

Westernized Chinks are almost worst than Jews. Ungrateful pieces of trash.

>ONE POST FROM THIS ID

But who really needs more than two strips of bacon in a meal?
All we're asking is that you not have access to those unhealthy high-capacity BLTs.

And you should be fine with strips of turkey bacon.

Low sodium turkey bacon.

Soy based bacon imitation.

Tofu.

How can you expect them to be grateful when, "thank you" isnt even an expression in ching chong land.
Im sure her immigrant chinese forebears who probably escaped Mao would be proud of her tweet here.

They are either doing mental gymnastics to not understand it because they hate guns or they damn well know what it means but don't care.

>ONE POST BY THIS ID

>ONE POST BY THIS ID

>Leftists in charge of knowing how the English language works

Atomics aren't covered by the 2nd anyway, nukes aren't really bombs so much as they are reactors which cannot stabilize or cool themselves and uranium isn't covered under the arms subsection.
It can be banned for the same reason napalm, dynamite and heroin can be.

The more you know.jpg

>tfw you will never travel back in time and punch michael moore in his gut cunt for making that crappy documentary.

I for one enjoy bait threads like this because it keeps Sup Forums from being an echochamber. It also forces debate and discussion with a faux representation of the "average joe" according to media even if it's just other Sup Forumslacks pretending to be a smarmy liberal.

Heavily regulated automatic weapons, and destructive devices is well regulated enough.

Rare nigga. Witnessed. (Also based)

She's American...

...

If the printing press wasn't invented when the first amendment came out, would technology take away our freedom of speech?

>no insight or content provided by OP

bait threads like this are clearly against the rules in the sticky, stop replying and report

BITCH BE
WESTERNIZED

>Absolutely degenerate

>T...TWO POSTS BY THIS ID

Same thread same response all day every day

This thread is almost as good the second time.

Thanks OP.

>Born: July 11, 1984 (age 31), Wuxi, China

>1 Post by this ID

STOP FALLING FOR THE BAIT

I'm sure you also saw that she is an american citizen and lives in america, right?

She has no clue what "well regulated" means

>Born: July 11, 1984 (age 31), Wuxi, China
>Wuxi, China
>China

Is China in America? I don't think so.
True citizenship is by birthright. Get off Sup Forums if you don't agree.

I loved Cool Runnings.

U.S. Citizenship is not strictly by birthright, sorry. Never has been and never will be.

If a dog is born and lives in a stable, does that make it a horse?

I have no idea why you think this is clever or relevant.

...

Why do Sup Forums tell me gooks aren't SJW's when they clearly are?

Yet Americans have business commenting on other nations matters

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
>The right of the PEOPLE
>SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
Why do people with such a poor grasp of the english language feel qualified to dictate the meaning of laws written in it?

Fuck rare flag!

>spot an uncommon
>try to save it
>already have it
Worst of feels

weed bro?

Wagwan rudebwoi

You need to be more precise. It's not simply commenting on "matters" of another nation. She's making a legal argument. As a layperson, she doesn't have the requisite skill or training to do so.

Law is complex - Constitutional law, doubly so. Why do you think lawyers are paid so much? It take a lot of time and training and ability to fully understand all of the contours of the Constitution, particularly in the context of our case law, jurisprudence, and academic analysis. This is no small feat.

Thus, some with no legal training - who writes teen fiction for a living - simply cannot make any meaningful contribution to the discussion of our Constitution.

Which is still conditional on the "well regulated" part, retard

Because that's one dumb bitch from California, not a whole people

Roof Korean is right. Call your superior officer militant now. If you don't have one - elect it. Only together you can stand up to commies and mudslimes.

Yee is the biggest piece of trash human on the planet besides that shriveled cunt Feinstein.

Actually it has been ruled that nukes are considered arms and are technically allowed under the second amendment (much like tanks,jets,etc) but it is a moot point since the possibility of a civilian getting hold of a nuke is impossible without stealing one which would be a crime and excuse to stop them.

Ayy
Jamaica Jamaica

Just ask what militia the founding fathers are talking about and if they say the National Guard mention that it came to existence in 1903

OP is a faggot trying to get author in trouble. Dont be this guys personal army.

She rarely gets political, its not like she posts "Kill All White Men" type stuff.

>Be a young man
>still am smart enough to realize that they meant "since a well equipped militia is necessary to ensure freedom, the people have a right to arm themselves and this right shall not be infringed"

They also seem to forget the WE THE PEOPLE

I can't see why you niggers cant understand that militia is a fucking army and police that they are talking about.

>The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. >Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected.

well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
>he right of the people to keep and bear Arms
>the people to keep and bear Arms

I will never understand why this is hard to wrap your minds around

this

The following are taken from the Oxford English Dictionary, and bracket in time the writing of the 2nd amendment:

1709: "If a liberal Education has formed in us well-regulated Appetites and worthy Inclinations."

1714: "The practice of all well-regulated courts of justice in the world."

1812: "The equation of time ... is the adjustment of the difference of time as shown by a well-regulated clock and a true sun dial."

1848: "A remissness for which I am sure every well-regulated person will blame the Mayor."

1862: "It appeared to her well-regulated mind, like a clandestine proceeding."

1894: "The newspaper, a never wanting adjunct to every well-regulated American embryo city."

KEK
Sup Forums and /k/ BTFO
will they recover?

No, dummy. The Second Amendment does not say or mean that only a "well regulated militia" can have guns, it says that a "well regulated militia" is necessary, therefore people's right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Thus, "the people" have the right to own firearms. I know you liberal retard Canadians are scared of things like guns, but that doesn't mean you're correct or have any basis upon which to try to interpret our laws and values. Fuck off.

>2nd amendment clearly only meant muskets
>well regulated militia is clearly literal and doesn't refer to the people

But they will vote for Shillary to bring more of their people to the USA. Wake up you yellow fever cuck.

FPBP

>white knighting some gook skank

In this "1 post by this ID" copy pasta Jews conveniently ommit the fact that this bit is a reason justifying protection of this right as not infingable, not the sole purpose of owning arms and what they try to imply here is a fabricated argument with no basis in reality.

Therefore JIDF PLZ and SAGE

they must think that the 1st amendment only pertains to printing presses and Christianity

lel
JAMAICA WE HAV A BOBSLED TEEM

Ignoring all the other errors she's likely to have made, she should familiarize herself with U.S. Code 311.

Ok I honestly have no idea what the second amendment was actually writen and google gave me this.

>"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Do people not understand how commas and grammar works? No wonder the US is 35 in education.

A well read electorate, being necessary for the literacy of a free state, the right of the people to keep and read books shall not be infringed.