Why does the concept of human race enrages liberals so much? What's wrong with saying that a black man and a white man are vastly different? I'm not even talking about behaviours, that's influenced by cultures, but even physical attributes are different and physical "expectations" are different. A black man usually excels in certain athletic fields, while a white man excels in another one, and a yellow man excels in yet another one. Is that racist?
Why is the concept of human races so bad?
Other urls found in this thread:
fjamger.blogspot.com
en.wikipedia.org
telegraph.co.uk
nature.com
sciencedirect.com
jbhe.com
udel.edu
psycnet.apa.org
sciencedirect.com
udel.edu
wsj.com
articles.latimes.com
psychology.uwo.ca
hmg.oxfordjournals.org
pnas.org
sciencemag.org
amazon.com
charlesdarwinresearch.org
amazon.com
lagriffedulion.f2s.com
hmg.oxfordjournals.org
sciencemag.org
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
>muh we are all equal
>we can just import third-worlders as tax payers and voters
It would hurt politician's population replacement programs if it came out that third world trash is not even close to being as valuable as White people.
Besides, "we are one" is a jewish communist idea.
>A black man usually excels in certain athletic fields
You mean cotton fields?
Most of the liberals are women and women always deny the facts
Liberal doublethink
>diversity is our strength!
>we are all one race!
>blacks shouldn't be expected to perform as well as whites!
>we need more black people in our school curriculum to show how much they matter!
They have decided that whites are the problem race that must be either killed off or mixed down into the mud.
They must deny all evidence to the contrary or their scheme comes undone.
Is that why whites dominate strength sports?
...
Do you really have to ask? Once we start publicly acknowledging racial differences exists, it will be a shorter trip to Race War Island than you could have ever have anticipated
Because they are programmed to react to certain stimuli.
The worst cases literally cannot process the information.
It doesn't fit into their agenda, notice how they will nit pick what does for any current situation
the foundation of liberalism is emotional idealism which is why most leftists are egalitarians. and for an egalitarian world there must be no race
>I'm not even talking about behaviours, that's influenced by cultures
You've only swallowed half the pill if you actually believe this.
Any liberal or otherwise here can explain this to me or your plans?
> diversity is our strength
Because it's mostly like this over here:
> So... we've been killing each other in the past.
> Can we get shit done now?
> (Grumble grumble) Okay.
Still irrelevant in world economics despite diversity, except for that scandal.
The existence of race massively undermines their plans for globalism. If they admit that humans are genetically different, then they must admit that the races are behaviourally different. This would obviously throw a monkey in the wrench for a one world government because how are you supposed to have a global government when groups of humans are fundamentally different?
Easier to just stick your fingers in your ears and pretend it doesn't exist rather than face that problem.
Finally an American who disagrees with liberalism. Most seppos cite your founding fathers as the reason for their support of liberalism and racial equality. Good to see someone ignoring that dogma.
Egalitarianism is a fanatical anti-science cult that evolved out of Christianity.
It is like telling a Christian back during the middle ages, that a cracker cannot turn into a dead Jewish guy. The fact that you are obviously and demonstrably correct won't help you. They still want to kill you for saying that because they are fanatics.
>Why is the concept of human races so bad
Because to admit that is an admission that we are not all the same, we are in-fact biologically different.
Most liberal are acutely aware of race, they know we are different, they just don't want to talk about it in case they offend their pets, or they see it as a gateway to possibly an open debate on the merits of diversity vs homogeneity, and that's their worst nightmare. Because they know "diversity" is bullshit virtue signalling, that doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
>throw a monkey in the wrench
>current year
>learning your idioms from Die Hard
shiggy diggy
Yes I believe that the culture, religion and places where you live influences your behaviour. You grow up with a family that loves you, in a place with no criminality and where you are taught to be a good person, either by religious teaching or social expectations? You'll likely become a good person, even if the contrary can happen. And vice versa. You live in a slum, where you can survive only by becoming a criminal and with no role figure to follow? You'll likely end up in prison, but you can also turn out as an actually good guy
Culture is genetic, religions are evolutionary and habitats are the driving force behind evolution.
Did you go to school?
Because admitting it would shatter their entire ideology. It's the same reason why neo-nazis will say that socialism is okay in homogeneous societies.
Because it's inaccurate, user, why is that hard to understand?
It's a mirage, a trick of the light. Squint up just enough to make everything blurry and it looks right. Clean your eyes out and look up close and you find the reality is so much more complicated and intricate and peculiar, and the old blurry approximation is revealed for the trick of the light it always was.
Listen moron
Your the only person talking about looks or color...Everyone else is talking about genetics
>genetics don't exist
Is it just me, or did that Asian girl make this stupid graphic and use her face in 80% of the image, and that is her black friend she probably has sex with?
...
>society is oppressing blacks!!!
>we want to lift blacks out of poverty and make their lives better!!!!!
>black guy gets out of poverty and makes a decent living for himself and family
>omg you fucking uncle tom you're not black anymore!!!!!!!!
Liberalism is a disease
Also, racist just means youre anti-communist. Be a proud anti-communist, because it just means the opponents of communism.
Liberals are obsessed with race? You inbred hillbillies are the ones going on and on about niggers, kikes and spics. Liberals just think it's funny that you thump your chest and feel superior when half of you live in tar paper shithouses, never finished school and have no idea what a dentist is.
>eye color is the only thing that matters
>redneck meme
solid argument
lol
Because difference literally means the lack of equality, and liberalism/(cultural) marxism is built around the idea of everyone being equal.
No, no, no, all wrong. There is no issue with saying there are races so long as we acknowledge that what we are talking about are largerly superficial and minor geographic adaptations like changes to melanin content and nasal cavity shape and such. The idea that in less than 40,000 years a specie as complex and slow breeding as us had our most complex feature (abstract intellectual capacity) significantly altered to any degree worth mentioning because we migrated to Europe where apparently there were selective forces to create muh masterrace at unprecedented speed is where this race shit stops making sense.
>b-but Europe is cold so Europeans had to invent fire and sheit!
Africa gets cold and Africans mastered fire long before anyone left that continent. If anything, it would potentially make more sense to say Africans would have needed to be smarter since they needed to survive in the world's hostile predator capital. The needed to figure out how outsmart lions and hippos, where euros had the daunting task of figuring how how not to get killed by rodents and grazing animals.
Reminder that death is the punishment for what youre doing.
you should really get your nose out of a copy of guns germs and steel and look at the accomplishments today
I see you don't have an actual arguement of any sort.
>haha he disagrees with me he must be like 'muh Jared Diamond' and shit right? I bet he's cuck like that Carl guy, man what a cuck.
>I mean obviously racism is true it's like, just obvious! Duuuuh!
You just described 80% of Africans too ;^)
Yeah, yeah it's only da melanninz we wuz whitez & shit
>oh shit africa is still a wasteland after thousands of years
>better ignore all the other civilizations on earth with running water and just say africans got an unlucky habitat xd
two can play at the green text game friend
Because they know after instinctively comparing them that they are better or worse than the other in some ways.
It goes against the fantasy that we're all equal.
And I think it's funny that people like you would never point out such traits in non-white people unless it is to make excuses for them
The people you just described don't post on Sup Forums.
whoops, dropped my facts!
an accepted genetic factor to explain negroid inferitority and violence is a game changer. removal of negro voting rights, removal of black african nations from the UN. open africa for higher races to claim land as "eco reserves" etcc
Ok I brought up two main points originally and they still haven't been addressed.
1. The time frame is way too short and human complexity is too high and reproduction rate too low for anything beyond superficial adaptations to occur upon our migration out of Africa.
2. There was no selective force in Europe for high-end, abstract human intelligence that didn't exist in Africa that would have been so strong to create 'muh standard deviation' in such a short period of time.
Only 40,000 years?
>time frame way too short
thousands upon thousands of years is too short?
what's that burning smell?
>There was no selective force in Europe for high-end, abstract human intelligence that didn't exist in Africa
read "the 10,000 year explosion"
Eye color is just one trait faggot.
Looks like it's closer to 100k for the earliest homo sapiens leaving Africa which is just as insignificant. The 40k number I had in my head I believe was the migration to the Americas.
Human intelligence up to 75% inheritible
telegraph.co.uk
Human intelligence is highly heritable.
nature.com
Scientific consensus is that IQ tests are not racially biased.
sciencedirect.com
Very poor Whites are comparably intelligent to very wealthy blacks.
jbhe.com
Privately, intelligence experts hold more hereditarian views than they express in public.
udel.edu
Black children raised in White households have similar IQs to black children in black households.
psycnet.apa.org
The average African IQ is estimated at 79.
sciencedirect.com
The average African-American IQ is 85, compared to the average White IQ of 100.
udel.edu
The white-black gap in SAT scores, a proxy for IQ, is increasing.
jbhe.com
Genes for large brains, linked to high IQ, are common everywhere except Africa.
wsj.com
Intelligence has at least a 40-50% genetic basis.
articles.latimes.com
IQ scores are the best predictor of success in Western society.
psychology.uwo.ca
What about the 4% of my DNA that isn't even human
Is that significant
IQ is 75% heritable among Whites.
psychology.uwo.ca
>The ASPM gene of Chromosome 1 has been shown to effect brain morphology and defects lead to smaller brains and low IQ.
hmg.oxfordjournals.org
>A new ASPM allele arose in Eurasia and has been suspected at increasing intelligence and has been demonstrated to be absent in Blacks.
pnas.org
sciencemag.org
>IQ gaps between Whites and Blacks are observable at the age of three, prior to cultural influences or potential effects of racism.
amazon.com
>Blacks mature faster than Whites
charlesdarwinresearch.org
>The IQ gap reflects this; the gap is 0.7 standard deviation (1 SD is 15 points) at early childhood, 1 SD at middle childhood, and 1.2 SD into early adulthood.
amazon.com
>About 37% of Blacks have an IQ below 80, while only 9% of Whites do. Blacks are 6x as likely to have an IQ of 70 or less as Whites, 12% of Blacks compared to 2% of Whites. Half of Whites have an IQ over 100 (average) but only 16% of Blacks do. Only 1% of Blacks have an IQ over 120, but 9% of Whites do.
lagriffedulion.f2s.com
>The MCPH1 gene of Chromosome 8 with alleles known as "microcephalin" partly determine brain size and morphology
hmg.oxfordjournals.org
>Beneficial alleles are common in Eurasians but rare in Blacks. The MCPH1 and ASPM gene correspond with the development of hand-crafts and the development of sophisticated cities which were common in Eurasian populations but unheard of in sub-Saharan Africa.
sciencemag.org
>It doesn't get cold in Africa and Africans didn't invent clothing or fire production
You're just baiting me right?
No he's just a moron
>winter at the equator versus winter in the north
guess which one is a lot more harsh than the other
So what the fuck are you trying to argue exactly that Europeans walked into Europe and immediately invented kerosene heaters or something?
you're putting words in my mouth my dude. im saying that it's a lot harder to have to plant crops in time to harvest them before winter and to preserve said food and children during winter than it is to throw a spear at a boar.
To put it in a over-simplistic way OP it comes down to this: It Goes Against Their Narrative
It is that simple, these people hold strong political & ideological beliefs (which we all do in a way), when when a Reality like Race contradicts and therefore invalidates their own beliefs it causes a great deal of cognitive dissonance.
it violates their secular substitute of a religion
well it brought the average up so they could make those things to begin with. glacial populations are smarter than tropical ones due to its stressors.
This.
Its a universal truth in the Animal Kingdom that cold weather animals are smarter than their warm weather cousins
This is accepted truth, the arguement is that 100 thousand years was not enough time for this to happen in humans...The invention of the internet, computer, automobile modern science etc says otherwise
No, listen, morons. I'm talking about what happens to the concept of race when you attempt to define it genetically. It disappears. It doesn't actually exist.
Is Sup Forums okay with me having mixed race kids if they're white/Asian, because memes aside I as a blonde haired blue eyed white man find East Asian women to be extremely attractive...
TRUUUUUUUUU
Is Sup Forums okay with me having mixed race kids if they're white/Asian?*
It does exist
Get your Jew propaganda the fuck off Sup Forums
Not only am I a different race then black people, 4% of my DNA isn't even homosapien..
Can I race mix with Asians?
Next you'll tell me the earth is flat and the sun rotates around it?
You summerfags just get dumber every year.
look up the warrior gene and look at the allele frequencies and tell me that doesn't contribute to the noticeable difference in violent crime rates (according to fbi statistics)
en.wikipedia.org
>Studies have found differences in the frequency distribution of variants of the MAOA gene between ethnic groups: of the participants, 59% of Black men, 54% of Chinese men, 56% of Maori men, and 34% of Caucasian men carried the 3R allele, while 5.5% of Black men, 0.1% of Caucasian men, and 0.00067% of Asian men carried the 2R allele
>blacks are 55x more likely than whites to carry the violent chimp allele, 3R
>but m-m-muh social construct! muh institutional systemic oppression!
nah, violent chimp behavior has a genetic component
I'am all I give a shit about is genetic potential in intelligence...A lot of people aren't but there is very little arguement about the two smartest races having children.
Also Asian have a higher concentration of Neanderthal DNA which is cool...I'm talking about slant eyed asians not British Asians
*I am
Except there are different allele frequencies in different human groups around the around.
>I'm talking about what happens to the concept of race when you attempt to define it genetically. It disappears.
good joke
Sure there are all kinds of genes with all kinds of poorly understood affects. So what?
>missing the point entirely.
...
So what
They are poorly understood...So maybe we should stop destroying every white ethnicity until we actually understand them.
Your arguement is not a fucking arguement for browning Europe. Moron
Slant eyes don't worry not planning on giving a curry a reet good knobbin' any time soon, senpai.
Abbos are clearly not human. That looks like a Neanderthal skull, or even more primitive.
Yes, that's true of all populations, not merely humans, that's the definition of evolution.
And? You're making my case not yours.
...
Witnessed
>4177
Close enough
No its not...Environments shape evolution...Artificial swamping a habitat with loser races because their homelands are shit...Is not Evolution.
j. philippe rushton might have the answer you're looking for.He made research, which was later dismissed, about human evolution and how the black man is more capable in the athletic field than the white man, but has a less neurons resulting in lower intelligence.Although asain people have proven to be the most intelligent, by having overall higher iq and more brain neurons. TL;DR blacks= stoopid white= not so stupid asians= smart
>4% of my DNA isn't even homosapien..
Approx 99.9% of homo sapien DNA is the same - that is, there's 0.1% variance between you and any other homo sapien specimen, at best.
Homo sapiens share maybe 99% of DNA with their closest relative, the chimpanzee.
The problem with sourcing your science from cobbled-together bollocks is that you have fuck-all understanding, zero perspective and end up saying stupid shit like "4% of my DNA isn't even homosapien". Don't forget the other 95.9% mate, you might look like a twat otherwise.
You're dumb.....99.9% sounds high but .01% is everything in evolution and our unique genetic allele frequencies have a 14% variant..Go fuck yourself and your Jew social science view of genetics
And again 4% of my DNA isn't Homo Sapien...You dismiss the science for your own political purposes
They say 1-4% of you is Neanderthal and the higher the percentage, lighter skin tone. Read that from multiple sources, though I'm only human and make mistakes.
I don't need to guess I had my DNA mapped..I'm 4%.
Because the moment you start honestly judging people according to their genetic disadvantages our multicultural cosmopolitan utopia breaks down(more than it already is, anyway)
So they aren't the same...
They are not equal, they are different
Same way how a German Shephard and a Pitbull are are both dogs, but they have different temperaments, different needs.
Reminder not to engage in semantics arguments with liberals
It doesn't matter whether you call it race, subspecies, or ethnic group
There are objective differences between human populations consistent with geographical boundaries
No one fucking cares if there's more "diversity" within one of these populations, that's not the point
No one cares if it blurs near the edge of those geographical boundaries due to centuries of rape by less civilized groups
And none of us racists or race-realists truly care what it's called
What matters is that these differences are undesirable and heritable through breeding and that our countries would be better off without most of them
>99.9% sounds high but .01% is everything in evolution
Not sure what you're getting at here. If you're talking about functional DNA, the figure is more like 8%.
So if your point is that 4% of your *functional* DNA is neanderthal... well, I'd contest that also.
>our unique genetic allele frequencies have a 14% variant
Yeah, pretty sure you have no idea what you're talking about.
Explain for me, in your own words, what allele frequency is.
What about Semetic skulls, haven't seen one compared to a caucasianoid.
Pure Semites are Caucasian, the differences wouldn't be big enough to consider them another race, a subrace at most.
West Eurasians are all fairly close together in the grand scale of things.
Asuming due to the dermal bridge would be more significant, especially among male's skulls. Wouldn't that be a huge giveway when you look into historical figures skeletons?
>dermal bridge
??