Africa

>Africa
5 WC spots
>Asia
4.5 WC spots
>North and Central America
3.5 WC spots
>South America
4.5 WC spots
>Yurop
14 WC spots

What the fuck yurop? How is this fair in any way

Other urls found in this thread:

eloratings.net/world.html):
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

We have all the infrastructures required and the money to organize such event.

>not knowing there are 30+ nations in Europe.

fuck off you fat cunt

>concacaf
>6 spots
for what purpose?

Costa Rica and Panama are better than you.

IF anything Europa are given too few spots based on the quantity (and quality) of nations here

Europe deserve at least 20 spots

It's not nearly enough

Africa 3
Asia 2
South America 5
North and Central America 2
Europe 19

would be fairer

There are at best 6 European NT that are top tier, the rest are literally Andorra and Moldavia tier.

europe 20 i mean

fuck

where are Platini and Blatter from? I'll give you 10 seconds

Concacaf should get at least 10 spots then because of the US.

the only non-european countries that should be at the world cup are brazil, argentina, uruguay and whichever is the 4th strongest southamerican nation at that time.
everything else is just for show

But amerifats aren't interested in soccer

maybe if you start competing as individual states

>Concacaf getting 6 spots
>tfw no more hex

>Africa gets 4 extra spots in the 2026 WC whilst Europe gets 3

o i am laffin

idea: give conmebol 8 spots

didn't you idiots lose to fucking Costa Rica last World Cup?

There would be no competition so the NT would drop alot.
Altough I believe that Ecuador and Paraguay deserve a spot much more than half of all the european qualifieds

>tfw chances of having a top nation falling to the underdog increases

Based on the FIFA rankings

>the 13th best European team
Iceland
>the 13th best concalaff team
Suriname
>the 13th best African team
South Africa
>the 13th best Asian team
Iraq

Iceland would finish first in all those qualifying groups. Should be more than 13 2bh.

>there would be no competition in Conmebol. so the NT quality would drop alot
fix'd

Chile, Argentina, Brazil, Colombia and Uruguay are all contenders and South America doesn't even have 5 guaranteed spots, meanwhile Euros have 10 filler spots

>this england cuck thinks iceland is good because they knocked them out

nah, iceland is shit. got totally btfo in the next match

except it's not 13 for all conferences, so this logic is completely flawed

Except Chile, Colombia are to some extent were dogshit and did nothing in the world cup before 2010. Chile and Colombia are the best they've been for decades and they're certainly not contenders at all. I'd say only Brazil from SA are.

Because Israel is in the UEFA

I'm pointing out why it's not 13 for all confederations.

Way better than England though ;)

number of teams in the top 32:
>uefa: 18 (13 spots + host)
>conmebol: 6 (4.5 spots)
>caf: 3 (5 spots)
>concacaf: 3 (3.5 spots)
>afc: 1 (4.5 spots)
>ofc: 0 (0.5 spot)

wow why does FIFA hate UEFA and CONMEBOL so much???

Chile won Copa America back to back. Chile and Colombia were not always strong NTs, but the same happens with other south american nations too, Peru and Paraguay are strong at times.

>implying FIFA rankings are accurate

CONMEBOL+CONCACAF and OFC+AFC merge when?

OFC is pointless.

CONMEBOL qualies with 7.5 spots for 10 teams will have no sense.

>UEFA: Germany, Italy, Spain, France, England, Netherlands, Russia, Portugal, Sweden, Belgium
>Conmebol: Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Colombia, Chile
>Concacaf: USA, Mexico
>AFC: Australia, Japan
>CAF: Cameroon, Nigeria, Egypt
And two other spots to complete 24.

world cup should have 16 teams (group stage -> quarter-finals)
5 from europe, 4 from SA, 3 asia, 2 africa, 2 NA, oceania joins asia.

ELO rankings top 32 then (eloratings.net/world.html):
>uefa: 19
>conmebol: 8
>concacaf: 3
>caf: 0
>afc: 2
>ofc: 0

The worst thing about the 48 team WC is the stupid 'best third place' shit, it just makes teams play defensive football.

worse, it will be groups of 3, where the top 2 qualify

the problem with these rankings is that to climb the ladder you have to beat the top teams, and countries from other confeds don't even get the chance of playing against the teams on top.

>It's another "The WC should have the teams I like best" thread

Jesus christ. So team A plays team B, then team C has to wait 3 days or more to play one of them in the same group? FIFA literally ruining the WC

Better than part-time dentists

One of the worst posts I've ever seen on Sup Forums

I know, we deserve more spots

I wonder if lesser nations actually ask for more spots or power hungry Europeans promise them to get the votes.

reminder

also reminder

The AFC and CAF top teams even struggle to reach the WC quarter finals, whereas the big dogs from UEFA and CONMEBOL are always there in the finals or semis. This creates sort of a chain pyramid in the latter confeds that allows countries like Iceland or Peru to figure in the top 32. They're tier 3 teams who beat tier 2 teams who beat tier 1 teams, therefore they earn more points than China or Tunisia. You just can't give bonus points to AFC and CAF countries to match UEFA countries outta nowhere. To fix that, better just put asian teams in qualifying groups with africans or europeans.

The rankings are the best measure you have, even accounting for the continental clustering. And the truth is that Europe and South America have the strongest teams and the rest have at best 3 above average teams.
Asia and Africa only have 5 spots to provide some geographical diversity and I have nothing against that actually. Just don't complain 13 spots is too much for Europe.

England don't deserve to be in any world cup after 2014.

A small nation like Costa Rica has more heart and passion than overpaid buffoons playing for Man Utd. and Chelsea.

Yurop should only have 10 spots:
>Germany
>France
>Spain
>Italy
>Portugal

Let the rest of the continent battle for the other 5. Cause countries like Slovakia, Russia and Sweden have never done anything of note in the world cup, unironically Senegal, Cameroon, and Ghana have done way better in recent tournaments than third tier yuropeen nations.

It should be even more spots for Europe. Have intercontinental playoffs and let the best teams qualify.

No concacaf countries have ever done anything in the world cup.

>sweden
>russia
>never done anything of note in the world cup
wut

>Cause countries like Slovakia, Russia and Sweden have never done anything of note in the world cup,
Way to show how little you actually know about the world cup

>Sweden have never done anything of note in the world cup,

dumb amerilard

>It should be even more spots for Europe
Henry making sure Ireland didn't go to the world cup was the best thing he ever did in his career.

>recent

no only wrong but also incapable of forming a coherent sentence apparently

>never

k

said england lmao.

>Colombia are to some extent were dogshit and did nothing in the world cup before 2010
Neither did England, or Wales, or Scotland or wherever isle you're from.

>1994 isn't recent for Sweden
>1990 is recent for Cameroon

literally kill yourself you horrible little cunt.

>all yellow teams always in
>either win a cup to gain perma-entry or three finals appearances (a little wink to the Dutch, really)
>4 teams beyond this list from Yurop
>3 teams each from Asia, North America (includes Caribbean), South America (everyone south of Mexico), Africa/ME (this means Israel too kek)
>if a team satisfies req. for perma-entry, you kick the team that has gone the longest without winning, and add a ticket to their nation's lot, take one from whatever Federation produced a champion
Bang.

Don't forget what happened to Cameroon in that world cup

Yurop has more spots than any continent so statistically they should have more wins than anyone else but yet they only have 3 more wins than South America who have 1/3 of the spots.

>3rd tier European nations have apperently never done anything in recent world cups
>african teams have done "way better"

>croatia, sweden, bulgaria and turkey have all made semi-finals since 1994
>literally no african team has EVER made a semi-final

why do these horrible fat cint amerisharts even try and comment on this sport. get the fuck off of this thread cunt

But blud, I literally just fixed the sport

Colombia's best result is a QF which they got in 2014. Chile's best is the last 16. They're traditionally pretty dogshit. The objective facts aren't in your favour.

>UZBEKISTAN V NEW ZEALAND IN THE WORLD CUP
>FIXED

NAH

England are a horrible team you seething bloke

>1994 is recent
Never go full retard

>imblyign you know what good international football looks like
Anywho idk who got your feathers ruffled, but I was this guy Maybe this semen-slurping sport isn't for me

Extremely bad post.

too many spot for asia, so saudi should not go to wc

chile's best is 3rd la
if we´re counting england as winners we might as well count ancient achievements

the cunt literally claimed 1990 was recent by saying cameroon had done well. kys

this

Only yurop teams worth anything are Germany,Italy, France, Spain, Portugal, Belgium, Switz, Poland, Croatia, Serbia.

Can't include England in this list in good conscience.

The other 4 slots should be distributed to the other continents at 1 a piece.

>50 billion more yuropeon teams than others in every world cup
>surprised that they reach later stages

really did not make me think

The fact that USA aren't even making this world cup just nulifies any argument they have

The world cup should only be open to Europe and CONMEBOL

Hmmm

u wot cunt

Faroe Islands and Finland sure are forces to be reckon with.

>chile
kek

This, rest of the world doesn't understand how shit they are.

More spot to euros team and less to shitty federations.

I bet based Finland would qualify if it wasn't in UEFA

Was this USA's greatest draw since Rustenburg?

>world cup
>only 48 nations qualify

what is this farce?

Fuck off

SA already has 5

>talking shit to a team you've finished behind in two straight world cups

Needs more spots for Europe. Conmebol has too many.

CONCACAF down to 4.5
OFC up to 1.5
UEFA gets the extra spot

FIXED

Asia/Oceania can start talking about how many spots they get once they start making the RO16

Syria are going to destroy you, just you wait.

Nice. Your NT better lose against Syria in the play off straya, for a greatest banter of decade.

>NA, CA and Caribbean get 6 spots
Wtf, Europe!? How is this fair in any way?

>last 5 WC results: Europe 4 - SA 1