Sup Forums utterly BTFO

Sup Forums utterly BTFO

>people raised on low IQ anti-western propaganda written by a dumb leftist who wrote the first book on a napkin are more prone to disliking donald trump

Wtf I hate Harry Potter now

>leftist children don't like Trump

who fucking cares?

DULLEST

So?

Only Muslims hate Trump

Well of course readers of Harry Potter wouldn't like Donald Trump, since they have no taste as they are avid fans of one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Not surprising since it is the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though r-right
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>anti-western propaganda
Gonna sit back and watch you try and explain that one.

HURR DURR MSM PAINTS SOMEONE AS LITERAL VOLDEMORT, HP FANS DONT LIKE HIM

WOOOOW THIS IS PERFECT FOR MY FILLER ARTICLE

I grew up with the Harry Potter books. Started reading them when the second one came out and bought them all the day the released. Saw every movie in theaters including midnight releases (once I got my drivers license). I'm 2 months younger than Radcliffe so I always felt more connected to the movies when they released yearly/mostly yearly.

I am a huge Trump supporter. TIME BTFO

Hispanics love Trump too, and blacks...he has a wonderful relationship with everybody.

Rowling is the opposite of a leftist, you dumb fuck. Her books are trash.

lol

double pasta

Children reading YA self-insert mary sue books don't like Trump

Hmm really makes you think.

>don't care for trump
>yet also don't like harry potter because it's trash compared to tolkien

>LITERAL VOLDEMORT
Trump is accused of being some kind of racial supremacist when he's clearly all about Americanism (his own word) regardless of race

Not really.

Younger people more likely to lean left.
Younger people more likely to read harry potter.

It's not really anything special about trump.
Older people are generally more conservative.

Pretty much the same. Around that age, read most books after the first the days it came out and saw them all in theatre on opening night.

Not a huge trump supporter, but it was probably the right candidate to win.

Not reading that shit, you could have just said "Harry Potter is for children and "slow" adults"

BASED POTTER FANS

She was pro remain for brexit you utter retards.

She's a libcuck writing libcuck propaganda.

>Readers More Likely to Dislike Donald Trump

ftfy

No they aren't. For a kids book they are remarkably good

It's trash compared to any real book. It's not even YA shit, it's a series for children that attempted to grow up with the children but failed miserably to attach any more adult themes or improve the quality of the writing or intrigue.

Ya rly