Why did the English based their national identity around a bunch of cucks that got beat by the Normans?

Why did the English based their national identity around a bunch of cucks that got beat by the Normans?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Saxe-Coburg_and_Gotha
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

What are you talking about?

...

In the long run, you don't choose your nationality. Also, the kangs in England were not entirely of local stock either. That's probably why England has a such a social divide and why the elites in England import so many pakis and so on.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Saxe-Coburg_and_Gotha

Which is funny because even those(anglo-saxons) were the conquerors(foreigners).
The only true natives are romano-celts or simply celts like welsh people.
Kng Arthur is celebrated in the UK even though he was a legend that fought agaisn't them

the Plantagenet did not get "beat by normans"
it was through succession

Britain had a pretty shitty spawn location, cucked by Celts, cucked by Romans, cucked by Celts fighting the Romans, cucked by Romans again, cucked by Germans, cucked by VIkings, cucked by Normans. And from this menagerie of immigrants and rape babies, England was born.

This also eksplen the klusterfak dat is the Inglish """""""language""''''''".

lol, britain has the best spawn location, beating out portugal and netherlands

And then we cucked the world.

>cuck

Back to Sup Forums dumb shart

Our spawn location is the best. Far enough away from the roman rapetrain yet close enough that we could learn civilization by discovering them and not the other way around.

no, britain is the best

the roman raped britain because they didn't unify, while the seperate nordic peoples got off the island and wrecked the mainland the britons didn't need to as the land was plenty

after england united under a foreign rule they were able to influence the world as easy as just trade, they didn't even have to have a significant land army, throughout history they had a very small overseas land army simply because of their superior naval position

>got off the island
peninsula* obvs

But most of them died. The Romans burned down settlements just to draw out enemy armies. That's terrible.

Drop the proxy

well yes the celts got wrecked but we are talking about england

we can always talk about how there are even less extant celtic people on the continent

>well yes the celts got wrecked but we are talking about england

But the Celts were, ah forget it

Did someone noticed that they are none British flag in this thread? Where are they?
I need my dose of Bongs

The majority of the British population are still Celtic though. The Angles/Saxons, etc., kept to themselves in the South/South Eastern part of England, and even there they're not the majority. L21 is Celtic, S21/S28 are what we would call Anglo-Saxon.

bye

>fuck the Irish we're British!

Exactly, fuck the Irish, become the Irish.

t. Micky McFinnigan

they also introduced culture and language when practically no one speak any form of celtic in england, they may still exist but not as celts

Culture can be changed in a generation, DNA is impossible to change. If the British public were aware of their actual heritage, "Anglo-Saxon" pride/culture would die overnight.

but not history

WE

I don't see what that has to do with anything. Apart from people having a new perspective on that history after learning about their heritage.