Was he right?
Was he right?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
definitely right, the ref was bad to the point that it was obvious
Chelsea got some calls their way too but for sure Barca benefitted way more
right
>Chelsea denied 5 penalties
>l-let me make it up to you by red carding one of their (barca) players
of course he was right.
ref appeared to be hugely biased for barca.
Still doesn't mean he was intentionally doing it, humans and especially retarded sport fans are mostly unable to comprehend that we can't know for sure whether it was a series of mistakes or foul play
That's water under the bridge
Not for Ballack
The first leg had a shit load of calls in favor of Chelsea that no one ever seems to talk about
what is trump doing there?
barca bitches full damage control.
When you rewatch the entire game, you see that it went both ways for both Barcelona and Chelsea except Barcelona benefited a bit more from the poor referee.
An actual biased shit show of a ref would be Rizzoli in the Uefadrid/Bayern leg last season. That shit was just pathetic and on a whole new level of bias.
youtube.com
youtube.com
Chicano shitskins full damage control
100% right.
How can you still ask ?
are you implying vidal didnt deserve to be red carded? Also, lewa's goal was offside as well
at least you tried
EETS A FOCKIN DEEZGRACE
>vidal didn't deserve to be red-carded
A clean one-leg tackle isn't a red card, Halal monkey spic.
yeah except he was already doing extra time on the field, he was supposed to be red carded way before that.
Yes
So glad to see Barcelona capitulating. Hope Catlonia gets independence and the club has to fold as a result
they just won their derby 5-0,got dembele and still have messi,suarez,ter stegen and others
the only thing wrong with them is their shitty board
>the only thing wrong with them is the most important thing
>0-5
dont fool yourself, a loss to juventus and the club is in shambles again
their first 3 games were the easiest path so far
>waaahhhh we we're eliminated by a team that actually wanted to play football, eetz a disgrace waaahh
>messi
>suarez
They've not got a lot of time left in those legs. Dembele is still unproven. The definition of a panic buy.
Can anyone give me the quick rundown on OP's picture?
Chelsea played better though, Barca's first shot on target was the goal in the 90th minute. Barca won the possession and the ref.
Can't stand Chelsea but this was absolute justice.
Chicano shitskins full damage control
It's a fucking disgrace.
>the club is in shambles again
Depends how bad the loss is, but you're right. People will jump back on the doom bandwagon. They're certainly not a bad team by any means, but people are looking for them to drop form now
Unironic Barca fan here, he was kind of right. Everyone forgets the bullshit Abidal red card which proves the ref wasn't biased, just really bad.
chelsea got a few penalty claims denied so the champions league could get a messi v ronaldo final instead of two english teams playing each other
People didn't care about Messi v Ronaldo in 2009 like they do now. That wasn't the reason it happened like that. But whatever hey just make up some dumb bullshit to fit the insane uefalona spammer narrative.
This, barca got a red card
The original BULL of Sup Forums
>barcabeaner calling anyone a chicano
>People didn't care about Messi v Ronaldo in 2009 like they do now
you're insane
t. chicano newfag