Pol thinks ethnically homogenous countries are great

>pol thinks ethnically homogenous countries are great
>Most ethnically homogenous countries are actually total shitholes
>All the rich countries are actually ethnically diverse
POL FUCKING BTFO

Other urls found in this thread:

washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2013/05/16/a-revealing-map-of-the-worlds-most-and-least-ethnically-diverse-countries/
theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/05/what-we-mean-when-we-say-race-is-a-social-construct/275872/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>France ethnically homogenous
wtf ?

The most homogenous countries are the best countries in the world according to this map.

Yes Korea,
Kazakhstan is the epitome of civilization
So are the african countries

sage this shit

>Africa is ethnically diverse on your map
>All the rich countries are actually ethnically diverse

Pick one and only one.

he means you're all algerians

You stupid fucking gook, the only reason rich countries are ethnically diverse is because Jews collaborated to change our immigration policies in the 60s and 70s and have flooded our nations with human garbage from places like India, Pakistan, China, and parts of Africa

If you take a look around at the most degenerate aspects of your society, chances are it has its foundations in Jewish institutions like our hollywood, music, and porn industries

>>All the rich countries are actually ethnically diverse
Rich countries are ethnically diverse because sandniggers, negros, latins and asians go to the already rich countries to be parasytes

>Russia
>Not ethnically diverse
Wut?

Sorry to burst your little bubble but the most advanced countries are white countries. Or at least were white some 50 years ago. Chink btfo

What makes Central Africa so diverse?

Does diverse mean nigger now?

...

your map is incorrect and your argument doesnt correspond to your map

>Does diverse mean nigger now?
it means that for about 10 years now

When will people understand that color is the least intuitive metric to present information? At least fucking pattern that shit.

t. Colorblind Vis Expert

...

My country literally sells diversity.
Why are we still Malaypoor?

>Canada is more diverse than us
Inb4 muh 60%

It's pretty obvious that ''diverse'' just means non-white, non-asian.

>Africa diverse
What a load of shit. It's like 99% niggers. Most diverse place on the map according to that pic.

This. Stupidest thread up right now.

>France is more homogeneous than Algeria
DAFUQ ?

Logic checks out... if you ignore the huge green spots in the fucking Middle east and Africa

what the fuck are you smoking, korea?

This. They get successful through homogeneity and that attracts immigration.

You forgot to include the premodifier 'white'

This is literally happening with your post OP

WTF... you're telling me that nigger congo is more diverse than america?

France is Algeria

>USA 60% white
>richest most prosperous country
>Russia 89% white
>total shithole

Why you steal American flag?

Did you guys steal an American flag and stitch a patch over the stars

Cuz that's exactly what it fuckin looks like

>infographic describes the opposite of what you are saying

Fucking Koreans can't english.

You're map doesn't even back that up. Are Afghanistan, Congo, and Somalia better off for being ethnically diverse?

No... It means that those countries are filled with different tribes that are genetically different to the other tribe right next to them.

You have to literally be retarded to see just that.

you forgot: diversity means no whites nowadays

salty

>Australia
OP BTFO

this map is a complete fucking lie, with a walk in a city you will see all kinds of ethnicities, white may be a majority but not by much

kek

the japanese should have slaughtered your limp dicked race
go away you fucking nigger
If that doesn't apply to different european nations, it doesn't apply to niggers either

>Korea
>100% gooks
>has to eat dog to survive

What if i told you...

Countries are etchnically diverse BECAUSE they are rich

Countries are etchnically homogenous BECAUSE they are shitholes.

You know what? Poland (Commonwealth) was diverse and rich once, and a few years later there was no Poland so go suck a jewish dick

Not one bit

Ethnically homogenous is just the politically correct way of saying mostly white/east asian. No one here believes African countries are bastions of economic success because of their homogeneity.

Are you retarded? It does apply to the Europe too, take Belgium or Switzerland for example, they're colored green because Belgium has Walloons and Flemish people and the Swiss are a mix of Latin, Germanic and French people.

...

More diversity just means more niggers

Looks like there's no correlation.
Uh, I mean EUROPE IS BIRTHRIGHT OF WHITE MAN
COME HOME WHITE MAN

what's that Brazilian doing on that Argentinean guy ?

>Canada
>more ethnically diverse than us

Is this just referring to culture or what?

>Using Washington Post as a source

Look who the fuck is talking.

If it weren't for cell phones and cheap labor, your country would be absorbed by North Korea, aka Best Korea

>Australia
>Ethnically Homogenous
When, 1970? Have you seen how many chinks showed up since then?

>Brazil
>NOT Ethnically Homogenous
u wot.

>fucking UGANDA
>Ethnically diverse
>When they literally genocided members of the non-majority race.
Okay, someone is having a bit of a giggle.

France is not homogeneous, neither is england, neither is russia...the map is retarded and you're even more retarded by trying to explain something that is factually inaccurate
teaching him how to Samba

>US
>Ethnically diverse
???

Uhh but this map shows the more diverse places as shitholes.

>africa
>diverse
i can totally see why south africa is diverse. i mean, that pile of dirt on the left? completely different to the pile of dirt on the right!

seriously though, diverse does not mean black. south africa is among the LEAST diverse countries in the world, due the low % of whites and other ethnicities. maybe if you count the elephants along with the monkeys who think they run the place, then yeah, its diverse in that sense.

dont worry though, europe? Russia?
>mostly homogenous
probably has no money, right?

Qatar cannot really be included there since only Qatari's can live here indefinitely, all foreigners must go home if they are not employed.

How was this study done? Are Norwegian and Greek ancestries considered different? Or is this yet another poll that really looks race but throws in hispanic for fuck all reasons and then calls everything ethnicity?

>all foreigners must go home if they are not employed
but their employers conveniently hold onto their passports while they are employed

>Random gypsy telling me that I'm retarded based on his own baseless assumptions
This map was created in a study published talking about why some areas are more homogenous or not: washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2013/05/16/a-revealing-map-of-the-worlds-most-and-least-ethnically-diverse-countries/

Ethnic groups in Uganda:
16.9% Baganda
9.5% Banyankole
8.4% Basoga
6.9% Bakiga
6.4% Iteso
6.1% Langi
4.7% Acholi
4.6% Bagisu
4.2% Lugbara
2.7% Bunyoro
29.6% others

Now you can also make a similar list about the French. Sure. Gascons, Parisians, Occitanians etc. But do those people view themselves as that sub-identity? no. They view themselves as French, while if you ask the random Ugandan person, he'll refer to his tribe.

>Why to not ever go work in Quatar.

That's true for two companies, both of whom are foreign and exploiting the law. The companies are Vinci Construction and UrbaCon Construction, if you're interested in knowing.

>Now you can also make a similar list about the French. Sure. Gascons, Parisians, Occitanians etc. But do those people view themselves as that sub-identity? no. They view themselves as French, while if you ask the random Ugandan person, he'll refer to his tribe.


you're fucking retarded.
And for the sake of humor, let's follow the line you started - IF YOU THINK UGANDA IS MORE SUCCESSFUL THAN ENGLAND, YOU ARE A FUCKING MORON

Homogenous WHITE countries you silly slant

Our country is definitely not ethnically homogenous.

If that is true, then why do I look like a shitskin despite having my ancestors be 100% Austrian/German

...

LET ALONE THE FACT THAT SEEING YOURSELF AS A NATIONALITY AS OPPOSED TO A TRIBE IS PROOF ENOUGH THAT YOU ARE RETARDED FOR ARGUING THE LATER IS BETTER


Also, I see myself as an Apache Helicopter - and therefore i should be treated as such
how stupid are your swamp people?

> let's follow the line you started
That's not what he said at all.

>>pol thinks ethnically homogenous countries are great
>>Most ethnically homogenous countries are actually total shitholes
>>All the rich countries are actually ethnically diverse
>POL FUCKING BTFO


this is what the thread is about, what exactly do YOU think he meant?

Central Asia is not diverse as America but still we have lot of russians, Koreans, and people from other central Asian countries. But OP's map and claim sucks

Australia being homogenous actually makes sense because we're 99% chinks now.

sage

>Moldova ethnically diverse
well I guess I'm #RichMissile now.
Also
Africa - ethnically diverse yet shithole
West Europe - ethnically homogenous yet rich
You BTFO'd yourself you fucking idiot.

You're not talking to OP though. You're talking to some random Dutchman who answered your question about what ethnis diversity in Africa.

I think you should take a deep breath and find a way to untrigger yourself before you make another post.

Here your (you)

*Excluding african people. They are to stupid to built and maintain a society.

I'm starting my flag collection with you

Thanks

He said that tribes are genetically different to the tribe next to them, at least read the whole comment thread before trying to make sense of his nonsense


>No... It means that those countries are filled with different tribes that are genetically different to the other tribe right next to them.

Europeans are genetically different themselves; Stating that you are an apache helicopter or french, doesn't imply anything about genetics

Are we looking at the same graph?

>vast majority of "diverse" nations in africa
Yeah it sure looks like that ethnic diversity they've got is really making them prosperous.

>All the rich countries are actually ethnically diverse
They are diverse because they are wealthy. Not the other way around.

Also why is your picture saying the opposite of what you said. Africa is green, while Europe is orange.

He did, but if you bothered to read the article, you'd know that ethnicity, like race, is a social construct. He also never said that diversity = strength or whatever you accused him of saying.

Has anyone considered that OP is colourblind?

RARE

>you'd know that ethnicity, like race, is a social construct
Lad,please.

he could just be a faggot

>you'd know that ethnicity, like race, is a social construct.
back to the bin you go

it's like me saying i'm of dacian descent makes me instantly dacian regardless of me being slavshit.
The map is flawed, the dutchman has no idea what he's talking about, and you my kangaroo riding friend are on the wrong side of science

I'm colourblind and this makes no fucking sense to me.
Why do retards always make graphs with shitty colours like this..

I can probably guess what it says though.
The rich countries are European countries, and European countries are being genocided.
We were rich before the Jews opened the flood gates.

Much more likely

I'm only quoting the first sentence of the article the picture corresponds to
washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2013/05/16/a-revealing-map-of-the-worlds-most-and-least-ethnically-diverse-countries/
>Ethnicity, like race, is a social construct, but it's still a construct with significant implications for the world. How people perceive ethnicity, both their own and that of others, can be tough to measure, particularly given that it's so subjective.

Which links to this article that explains it better than I can. theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/05/what-we-mean-when-we-say-race-is-a-social-construct/275872/
But since I know you wont read it tl;dr we just make up our owna nd others ethnicities to make sense of the world.

What?

Your map shows Europe, the richest area on Earth, as homogenous. And Africa, the poorest area on Earth, as ethnically diverse.

Real low fucking quality bait

>it's like me saying i'm of dacian descent makes me instantly dacian regardless of me being slavshit.

That's pretty much exactly how it works mate. Do you rally think neighbouring tribes in Africa are that different? Of course they're not, but they SAY they're different and that's all that really matters.

>1950s USA
>1939 Germany
>any western nation before immigration.

well it's exactly what i'm saying then. Africa is not homogeneous.... that was the original point i was making that the dutchman was disputing

USA is rich because of the 60% who are white, and capitalism.

Russia is poor because of decades of the cancer of leftism and communism.

This should be obvious to you you stupid 3 foot tall gook. Your neighbor is poor for the same reason. Now go take your measley one inch dick and feeble hairless body and go snack on a puppy.

>pol thinks ethnically homogenous countries are great
Depends on the ethnicity, you doofus.

Brazil is literally split in two bro

>All the rich countries are actually ethnically diverse
Pretty sure Africa and Central Asia aren't rich AT ALL, but okay.