ITT: Movies LITERALLY only you've seen

...

...

...

I seen that.

The Cain and Abel scene were the only good part of the movie.

I was literally alone in the theater when I saw it and I wouldn't be surprised if boxofficemojo says the movie only earned my 7 bucks domestically.

...

I've seen this. I don't remember much at all other than Micael Cera ending up with Juno Temple.

Might even be wrong on that.

There were other people in the theatre with my brother and I when we saw this. I even had to tell some of them to be quiet. FAIL.

this movie was GOAT

Saw the first 5, maybe 10, minutes.

I forgot this existed. I saw it when it first came out, kinda curious to see it again now. I'll probably like it more this time.

Nigga I own this movie. There are some funny parts to it, like all of David Cross' parts, and when michael Cera has to oil up that hairy as fuck temple weirdo

Quite a shame as well. It was probably one of the best movies of 2016.

Thats it but it was a whole prehistoric thing so they called her Juno Tadpole

Yes OP, you're the only one in the universe who could have possibly seen a Jack Black and Michael Cera movie, they're so obscure only the true redditors know of their flicks.

Not the public's fault though. There was little to no marketing other than the occasional trailer. I will agree though it was definitely great. Did you get to see it in the 4K/120fps/3D format?

I saw this in the theater where I was one of 3 people in total. Nobody laughed for the entire movie.

So what about the tech and fps stuff made the film so great, haven't seent it yet and i'm curious. Like it felt realer, more intimate/involving?

>Came out in November

I literally did not hear anything about it until I saw your post.

All I know about that movie was that it was shit on pretty bad by critics.

very funny movie with great scenes

Unfortunately no since we don't have a theater equipped to handle it (other than the imax).

I watched in the normal format but the way its filmed, you really feel like MC himself. So Im guessing the tech probably makes that feeling complete. Still a good movie either way.

Yeah it was severely under marketed. Almost none.

Literally who?

I liked year one.

I liked year one.

>not Juno Temple simulating handjobs on sticks

saw this in theaters
ended up falling asleep 20 minutes in and an employee had to wake me up

saw this in cinema back in the day with a few people from college. we were close to walking out. the only moment that had me laffin was when some character asked his sidekick if people were booing him. my other simpsons obsessed buddy and me turned to each other and did the BOO-earns joke. awful movie, i actually liked jack black before seeing that

This is actually a great movie

...

I actually liked Year One.

There were some stupid bits but overall I found it pretty funny.

The only time I laughed is when he's standing in front of the fun house mirror.

this

...

...

I assuming you don't see a single nipple in this movie.

Egg?

...

tons of breasts, actually, in fact you'd be hard pressed to find a non-porno with more boob shots

Color me intrigued then.

...

it's quite amusing, made by the same guy who directed pic related

it's basically Enter the Dragon meets Masters of the Universe, with bimbos

7/10, tbqh

I rented it for a sleepover when I was like 8.

I watched it in school

i own all of them. this one is probably the most fun.

...

Probably one of my favourite movies, never seen anyone talk about it on here

Is that really Moot?

BTW pic related probably applies.

1996 French flick called "My Man" (can't remember the original title). Think it had a urologia scene, all I recall.
Reach the Rock (1998)
National Lampoon's Men in White (1998)
A 1987 Barry Bostwick movie where he's sleeping with 3 women at once, maybe called Addicted to his Love or something like that

for some reason i had the DVD but I haven't seen it

I've seen every Errol Flynn adventure movie at least 10 times and Captain Blood is no exception

He's my favorite actor

I don't know what you're talking about, because I've seen it because of all the Sup Forums threads I read about it

Watch the Birthday Boys' Pooljumpers trailer. More of a riff on Dogtown and Z Boys because of the documentary format, but priceless

I was going to add Return to Savage Beach (1998), but after it showed at 4 A.M during the weekend I went to tell my best friend about how bizarre it was that Monday and he'd seen it too. Glad the world found out about Andy Sidaris through bad movie riffs on YouTube, dude's movies are perfect good-bad art

I have the Andy Sidaris collection on DVD, it's fun stuff

Rented this flick with a few friends because we wanted something to laugh at.
We were surprised by how decent it actually was. It's no kino but it's still a pretty good small budget horror movie.

...

The theatrical version has never been released outside of theatres, has it?

not sure, but I saw it in theaters with friends

best part was the fake trailers, movies themselves were meh

I liked it at the time, but rewatching the DVDs I have of the individual movies now, I find that they're pretty mediocre. They don't even have all of the trailers. I remember that the theatre had to put up signs explaining that it's bad "on purpose" because apparently people were walking out and complaining.

One review actually said it was, "One of the funniest science fiction movies of the Summer!"

...

I doubt half the cast even stuck around to watch this.

Never saw it, but I had a friend who did and would often bring it up as an example of a funny parody.

The movies were almost half as long in theaters. The dvd's got extended to feature lenght, and it really wasn't the best option. They should've just released it as it was.

This is unironically one of my favorite films. Fuck outta here.

>A star that bright he's gotta burnout
top kek

I've seen it! My parents still make jokes about how bad it was!

Kinda unrelated, but for years I legit thought only I knew of pic related because it was on an unmarked vhs at the bottom of this pile of tapes my dad got at some garage sale, and nobody I talked to knew of it (I'm a foreignfag, btw, so it wasn't particularly well known here.)

I can't be the only one who thinks this is a semi-kino right?

If I had to chose between two shit show apocalypses styles 90s Kevin costner "thriller" I'd chose the following. Fuck water world the universal city live show is better than that film

>Parents, they called us loud, rude- wet. We, were like, what's the problem?

I thought it was weird seeing Eastwood in this movie.

We watched this in 5th grade Catholic school.

EXPERT MODE: EMABLED

>5th grade
>movie came out in 2009

Why are you this young on Sup Forums? You still have so much youth to give to your priests

>villain doesn't even get a name

...

Villain isnt a villain, but the it depends on WHICH villain

Also my negro I thought I was literally THE only person who knew that this was

I've seen it too.
For Juno

the villain was named Dr.Zoetrope

I'm 18 and in college now

Bushwhacked

Huh, I never knew this was a real movie, I thought it was just a joke on the simpsons

...

Thought this was the Val Kilmer one at first.

I always liked it. It just really loses steam at the third act.

L I T E R A L L Y

It actually feels less real; everything comes off super-sharp as to seem surreal. It doesn't distract from the acting, but it undercuts emotional scenes.

...

way worse than the first 2.

first one is great, second is decent, this one is shit

...

why is it that so many sci-fi movies stumble in the final stretch?

Found this in a thrift store years ago, still have the DVD.

>it was a whole prehistoric thing so they called her Juno Tadpole
wat? why?

I just rewatched that the other day. I was taken aback by how fucking awful it was.

>it will never be the summer of 2009 again

Ok, I legitimately LOL'd

Well played

I thought it was okay. Also I'm pretty sure this movie was intentional with its lesbian subtext.