Who here excited for Saw kino coming this October?

Who here excited for Saw kino coming this October?
>directed by spierg brothers (predestination, daybreakers)
>longest shoot of any saw film (46 days)
>jigsaw's corpse is dug up and stolen
>tobin bell is returning
>charlie clouser is doing the score again, says both him and spierg brothers are giving the franchise a fresh new feel
>main trap will take place at a farm in a barn
>one trap involves a car and four motorcycles (3 of which will crash) in an underground warehouse
>donna evans will return to die in a trap
>mostly shot at actual locations rather than sets

It's pathetic, we can't even come up with new shitty franchises, we have to recycle those endlessly as well.

is this legit?

Would post pictures of the barn trap but Lionsgate were all over that as soon as they came on the internet and had them removed.

John Kramer right on that headstone

I kept on watching because I wanted to know about the speculated plot (Gordon) but the final movie was so stupid.

Feels like a shill thread.

I hope they review Saw with this new movie and bring it the old glory.

Last movie was really a disappointing end, so I'm glad they're continuing, or in this case starting fresh, lets go love Saw.

Say what you will, but Saw was the only long running horror franchise that was worth any shit in the last 10 years. From 2010 on we got shit - Paranormal Activity? Bleh.

In 80's and 90's we got Nightmare on Elm Street ,Friday the 13th, etc., a lot of cool yearly shitty slasher movies. In 2000 we got Saw, that was actually pretty well made through (except Saw 3D) with consistent "quality", while there are only 3 good NOES movies and most Friday the 13th franchise is shit.

So yeah I'm happy it returned. Should be something to do on Halloween again.

People hate on the Saw series because it wasn't made in the 80s. Saw is series is GOAT. Obviously the sequels are cash grabs like every sequel ever made but they're clearly putting in effort, they're clearly trying to entertain you. When you have trash like Paranormal Activity on the market, an effort to entertain you should be greatly respected.

QUICK

POST YOUR FAVORITE SAW TRAP

Final Destination was pretty kino.

The Conjuring movies are horrorkino though

explain this one

Exactly. Story was stupid, obviously, but it was nicely connected. It had established characters (more than just main character that sometimes returns or the villain, but others like cops, his wife, new villains), it was more creative with kills than any other series, it introduced something new or made it popular at least (torture porn), it had it's own style (quick camera cuts, colour filters). It was a thing, something special for a lot of horror fans.

We need something like that.

I think Conjuring is garbage. First one was ok but pretty much copies Poltergeist and a couple of other stuff. It has a lot of cliches and predictability and it's being too serious while it's laughably silly. Second one is even worse.

I agree, they're enjoyable and fun.

>2017
>still giving a shit about this awful franchise

I bet you're looking forward to the next avengers film as well

6 people tied on a carousel. Stops in front of a shotgun which will kill you. Guy on the outside can only save 2 by moving the shotgun. Has to condem 4 to death.

...

I surprised they haven't realised anything about the film. The Wikipedia page is bare bones

Final Destination got boring incredibly quickly. Saw has lovable heroes / villains for you to root for, a fun storyline that intertwines with mysteries spread across all films and entertaining traps. Final Destination has the kills but zero characters for you to latch onto since all of them die at the end of every movie (except for Clear who only survives 1 film and gets killed in the next one). FD gets boring incredibly quickly. There isn't enough carnage in each movie to keep your attention. First movie was fine because it was a new idea but the sequels were boring. There's about seven or eight deaths per movie in the 90 minute approx running time. Seeing as the deaths are literally the only appeal of the series, it's not worth the time for the little entertainment value it has, not to mention a large majority of the kills fall flat on their face for being uninspired.

the thing spins in circles with a shotgun at chest level. It randomly stops with a person in front if the gun and the guy outside of the cage has to hit a button to stop the gun from firing when the ride stops. If he pushes the button a metal rod stabs his hand. He can only save two though and must choose.

What will the TWEEST be?

>it introduced something new or made it popular at least (torture porn),
The 2000s being nothing but torture porn because of Saw is a meme that has no weight to it. It somehow became a popular belief to spout. People who know fuck all about the horror genre but are desperate to seem as if they know about it parrot the opinion that Saw popularized the torture porn genre despite the fact it's simply not true. We had the Hostel movies, Captivity, got anything else? The 2000s was an excellent decade for the horror genre, we had many excellent movies across many different sub-genres of horror.

Paranormal Activity truly fucked up the horror genre. Found footage movies generally lack craftsmanship, effort or talent to make. Studios can churn them out easily with no effort. They have zero interest in pleasing horror fans, found footage movies are mass produced with no care, these are designed to attract hoards of teenagers who will only go to see it so they can talk about how hilarious it was when Stacey jumped so hard she spilled her popcorn.

>says Saw didn't make torture porn popular and starts offending the guy for not knowing shit
>claims Paranormal Activity made found footage popular and not Blair Witch

Are you literally retarded? Name how many found footage movies there were between 1999 and 2009.

cloverfield

I'm definitely seeing it with a group of friends release day.

By the way, anyone know if there's a fancut of the entire Saw series that puts everything in chronological order?

I did some of that once. Got up to the bathroom trap from the first movie. Was a fun editing exercise, should get back to that some day.

Is the doll the killer?

Hes not a murderer

One whole movie. Good going champ.

Right on dude

could you put that up somewhere, mega?

Jigsaw never died and it was actually his twin this entire time, leading to another 8 sequels

I mean after he died they made 4 more fucking sequels and 2 video games

This I'm okay with, but they never followed it to its logical conclusion. Jigsaw should've inspired a cult of survivors that carried on in his name, not just a couple of people trying to power grab.

Well unfortunately my hard drive crashed so I lost it. I was rendering the chronological edit into parts that I felt a natural conclusion had been reached.

Part I was John before he became Jigsaw up until his first victim (Cecil in Knife Chair).

Part II was John recruiting Hoffman and Amanda as his apprentices, ended with John and Amanda setting up the bathroom game.

Part III was going to be the bathroom trap playing out.

IV likely the nerve gas house in 2, followed by Donnie Wahlberg's test.

I only got the first two parts done but since that was years ago I'm a lot more experienced with video editing so I'm sure I'd be able to do each part in about 30 minutes. Watching a chronological edit probably isn't going to be easy to stomach. The first two parts felt fine when I watched them back but when you get to parts of the timeline like the bathroom game and then Eric's test it's probably gonna get boring. When you watch the movies long events like the bathroom game or Eric's test are constantly interrupted with flashbacks and other scenes. In a chronological edit you'll just be watching the two guys chained in the bathroom from start to finish for about 45 minutes.

Regardless I think it's something that would be interesting to view start to finish. I'm definitely gonna get back to this in the coming weeks.

I unironically enjoy all the Saw movies and lore. I was even deep in the autism back when IMDB boards used to discuss potential traps during the Saw 2 days.

I'm excited for this franchise regardless if it's good just because it has been shit since 3. I hope they go for the psychological thriller like Saw 2 was than the gorefest that was 3-3D.

Favorite trap is probably Jigsaw's "Daniel is in a safe place" trap.

First I've heard of it. Can't lie, I love the saw movies. Even the bad ones. Excited to see what the Spierg brothers can do because I really liked Day breakers.

Reverse bear trap. The simple ones are best.

>In 2000 we got Saw, that was actually pretty well made through (except Saw 3D) with consistent "quality", while there are only 3 good NOES movies and most Friday the 13th franchise is shit.
Nah, the quality varies a lot. Saw 1 is a legitimately well done horror movie that doesn't deserve to be called "torture porn", 2 is gorier and dumber but solid, 3 is worse than 2 but not bad, 4 and 5 are terrible, and 6 is the worst of the series. I never saw 3D. The A Nightmare on Elm Street franchise is the most consistent horror franchise. ANOES 1 is a 10/10 masterpiece, 2 is literally Homosexuality: The Slasher but it isn't terrible, 3 is one of the best horror sequels of all time, 4 is a massive step down from 3 but it's solid, 5 is shit, Freddy's Dead has the worst writing of the entire series but it's more entertaining than 5, New Nightmare is very good, Freddy vs Jason is the definition of fun.

what was the deal here?

Honestly, the main one from the first. The bathroom is one of the most memorable set pieces in recent cinema.

Even the traps in VII were bad, I did like the opening one and kinda liked Linkin Park dude's one.

Honestly what 8 should be about, with them making a shrine out of Jigsaw's dug up corpse and Dr. Gordon leading them.

18+ imageboard, kiddo

Refute anything I said.

great lets get some hype

...