What's better when it comes to making art: Drugs or Autism?
What's better when it comes to making art: Drugs or Autism?
Depends on the art, of course.
definitely drugs
why not both?
Autism is basically the same but you don't ruin your mind, body and soul while using it
>basically the same
Drugs for rock music, autism for electronic, and a lobotomy for hip hop.
""""drugs = creativity""""
Both
Both
Drugs. Autism permanently destroys your social life while drugs are temporary and may actually improve your social life.
Drautism
love how that image fits exactly with the post
Both
If you're using a very wide interpretation of autism, then autism. Bach, Beethoven, Dostoevsky, Pynchon... Having the autism to focus that hard and struggle on and learn the rules. Hardworking autism > drugs. Although drugs can be a great mind opening and influential experience, it is definitely not a short cut to greatness.
>drugs are temporary and may actually improve your social life
loving every laugh
autism
you use drugs to amplify your already existing autism
Thats not what i was asking
They cancel each other out, duh.
Why that pic? What are you implying?
Both, autistics have creative minds that makes drugs even better.
This is demonstrably untrue.
You know exactly what Im implying, user.
Drugs, definitely drugs. Autism doesn't allow that human to be able to think in a way that allows creativity. It's why autistic savant types are more technically gifted than they are createively gifted. Like, look at Stephen Wiltshire's art for example. The dude's able to make very detailed art of real places through an insane photographic memory, but none of that implies actual creativity, just very high technical skill.
Brian isn't autistic
Ohh now i get it