>Next time they shine your light in the sky, don't go to it

>THE BAT IS DEAD


>lights it personally the next time


fukn TEST through the roof


i bet if it was a marvel scene, they would have had iron man saying some stupid line when he turned on the signal like

>ooops, your move super man

The movie is pure Kino

Why would there be an Iron Man symbol? Kind of lost me there chief.

If it was a marvel scene it would actually be enjoyable to watch and you'd care about the characters because they're likeable. :^)

Do you think the fact that he's challenging Superman's threat from earlier in the movie flew over most people's heads?

What are you on about?

DC, not even once

If it was a Marvel scene there would be no dream sequences involving mexicans babbling about Lois Lane or demons in the desert. Also, the MOTHERFUCKING Batman wouldn't be 57.

affleck is currently 44, movie was shot in 2013-4 or something

>affleck is currently 44
Same thing.

>dance off bro, you and me

wow can't believe batman did that

The scene of Bruce running into the dust cloud is the greatest scene in capeshit

>hasn't seen Blade 2

Not in over a decade

>fukn TEST through the roof
Why are snyderfags such numbskulls? Was this really worth a thread?

Watched it for the 5th or 6th time last night wasted as fuck on my 3d 55" kinovision. It really is an amazing work of art. Looks fucking beautiful as well. I literally have Batman and Superman fighting in my living room and it is glorious. Praise Snyder

I almost cried.

DC movies take themselves so seriously

>ooops, your move super man
I can actually picture this
Fuck
What have you done OP?

SS didn't take itself seriously at all, and it was way worse for it.

>>ooops, your move super man

>Friday ? gimme power. I wanna shed a little light on the subject, see if we can get Supergrover to play with the rest of the gang on Sesame Street, bring him in for a little Van Morrison-style stormy-night moondance."

>"Sure thing, Sir."

>Superman floats down

"What's happenin', Ayy Lmao ? Lookin' a little wet, pal, hope your leotard's waterproof, buddy ..."

SS was absolutely retarded and while every attempt at comedy was just embarrassing and served only to further highlight how retarded the entire movie was.

DC marketing recognizes only retards enjoy their movies. So they're trying to play to that.

I can't tell if you guys are being ironic anymore.

...

I'd love to watch Batman vs Superman. It's been on HBO pretty frequently the last couple of weeks.

But I don't watch movies under 30% approval, no matter how much Sup Forums memes them being good. You all tricked me with Sucker Punch too and as memory serves, that was also a Snyder flick.

But in the Snyderverse Batman is renegade and the cops don't call him with the bat signal

He used to work with Jim Gordon but then Joker killed Robin which fucked him up

Yeah so supermans quip about the bat signal makes no sense

>And they say Batman doesn't dance anymore

>>>ooops, your move super man
>>Friday ? gimme power. I wanna shed a little light on the subject, see if we can get Supergrover to play with the rest of the gang on Sesame Street, bring him in for a little Van Morrison-style stormy-night moondance."
>>"Sure thing, Sir."
>>Superman floats down
>"What's happenin', Ayy Lmao ? Lookin' a little wet, pal, hope your leotard's waterproof, buddy ..."

this is almost real

we have amateur and real directors on Sup Forums, can one of them please make this?

I should watch it again soon

BvS is good but dont watch the HBO version, find the extended cut.

so you think that Jim wouldnt shine the light if Scarecrow was on he loose? Just because there are rumors of Batman being more violent?

>BvS is good
No, it isn't.

Why? It's absolutely retarded. No wonder why you fat retards love these trash movies.

>fat retards
nice projecting

Nice validation, chubster.

>mfw im under-weight and insecure about it

>DC, not even once

Honest question, are you 14?

>triggered

true, it's great - KINO even

Actually I'm just surprised at how facebook-tier your post was.

>"Spotlight's on you now, Clark Kent, journalist with The Daily Planet, son of M-Mar-"

It's trash edited by a trained chimp. You're watching movies backwards, faglord.

How come no-one in this thread wants to talk about based Luthor?

I like Eisenberg in general.

it was done on purpose so it mimicked a comic book you swine

once you start laying down rules to film making then it's all lost, no longer art - but a product aka marvel flicks

>i-it's suppose to be bad!
Terrible.

The movie was crappily edited and did not play out like a comic book at all. Especially when the movie tried to use the source of three different comics crammed into one movie. Hack Snyder ruined what could have been the most epic capeshit of all time and instead gave us 30 mins of a crap cgi fight and 8 minutes of the movie's title. If It wasn't for "Dawn of Justice" it would've been false advertising.

Should've been titled: "Batman, Superman, Wonder Woman vs. Doomsday: Dawn of Flops".

Watched it for my 65" 4k when it was in stores. I cried.

I remember reading that the fight scene lasted exactly as long as the fight in the animated Dark Knight Returns.

the entire film was a contrast and ideological fight between Batman and Superman
capeshit audiences wanted an actual fight though where 2 people fight for 2 hours without getting tired because they're constantly taking breaks to talk and joke

TDKReturns was released in two movies, both 76 minutes. The theatrical edition of BvS is 153 minutes. The ultimate is 181 minutes.

Another noticeable difference, the animated fight was the last fight at the end of the movie and represented the climax. In the live action, it was part of the rising action, I guess? Or a mini climax? Not sure.

>capeshit audiences wanted an actual fight though where 2 people fight for 2 hours without getting tired because they're constantly taking breaks to talk and joke
>le audiences don't appreciate proper tension meme
Stop it. Stop making excuses for this terrible film.

There's literally no reason why the Doomsday fight should have been twice as long as the fight that was in the movie title. Even TDKReturns, which this movie is heavily sourced off of, wasn't a movie about Batman vs. Superman. Superman didn't show up until the second part. The movie was entirely about the Dark Knight's return.

Why the hell was a movie labeled: Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice have so little of actual Batman v. Superman? And I don't just mean action, there's plenty of other ways to express conflict. Then we have Dawn of Justice yet the justice league isn't formed here nor are the core members implied to have been formed. Superman and Wonder Woman never even talk to each other and Batman seems indifferent to her.

>There's literally no reason why the Doomsday fight should have been twice as long as the fight that was in the movie title.
Yes there is, the Doomsday fight represented the culmination of everything before, humanity's unavoidable hate for superman and Superman's love for humanity anyway
I admit that Wonder Woman was only in there for marketing reasons, but she fit in organically as superman couldn't beat Doomsday alone and Batman was useless

The entire film up until their fight was an ideological fight. Every scene showcased their conflicting viewpoints or Lex's attempts to manipulate them.

Oh boy, you are one of the worst apologists. Literally nothing is bad about the movie. You would probably defend Esienburg's acting.

>the Doomsday fight represented the culmination of everything before, humanity's unavoidable hate for superman and Superman's love for humanity anyway
Don't care. Wasn't necessary. Was terribly done. Was boring. The CGI looked like shit. Plus a lot of humanity loved Superman, it was pretty 50/50. The movie would have been better without Doomsday, easily.

>but she fit in organically as superman couldn't beat Doomsday alone and Batman was useless
Gal is a bad actress and the character was poorly done. Why didn't she use the kryptonite spear to kill Doomsday then? Don't give me headcanon reasoning either. Her theme was terrible too, and it made me cringe in the theater.

>The entire film up until their fight was an ideological fight
And thrown out the window when Lex forces Superman to fight and a mutual mother's name followed by Mary Sue Lois Lane ends the conflict and turns them into friends. Superman's entire sub-plot of detective work on Batman (which was a highlight of the movie, giving Superman a fresh intellectual characterization) was made irrelevant.

>there are plenty of other ways to express conflict

You mean like Bruce angrily staring at superman during the Zod fight? You mean like Superman investigating the Bat brand and its victims? Bruce arguing with Alfred over the death and destruction caused in Man of Steel and what he should do about it. Superman ripping apart the batmobile and telling Batman to fuck off and Batman immediately telling him to suck his dick.

I could go on.

Why do you faggots argue about this movie every day? It's obviously the same people bickering back and forth with autistic walls of text. Stop being retarded.

The FIGHT scenes desu. Not the entire movies.

The fight scene was in the second movie which, as I said, was 76 minutes long. An ~8 minute fight in a 76 minute movie is a big different from a ~8 minutes in a 2 hour and a half one.

If you add up all those scene it would be maybe 20 minutes? And the quality of them is poor. Staring angrily? Wow. Dramatic. An investigation that was irrelevant to the plot? That doesn't count. This movie was called BATMAN v SUPERMAN.

And we got Batman and friends take down Doomsday. Also Batman and Superman fight for a few minutes.

So you like memes and shitty banter in your movies then?

I either like that mishap or I like memes and shitty banter? You're mentally handicapped, kindly neck yourself.

>Literally nothing is bad about the movie
No, the film has its flaws. The entire conversation with superman and batman before the fight was entirely contrived, and it was ridiculous that superman couldn't just pin batman down and explain shit to him
Eisenberg did a fine job. Nothing amazing, but decent. Stop judging him on the character you wanted him to be, and judge him on the character he was portraying

>Don't care. Wasn't necessary.
That's your problem, you don't care about the film, you care about when the next explosion or joke to entertain you is coming

>Why didn't she use the kryptonite spear to kill Doomsday then?
Did you watch the film? It's very clear that
a. the spear only worked by being stabbed into his heart properly which none of them could manage
b. Doomsday was stronger than all of them and growing ever more powerful

>And thrown out the window when Lex forces Superman to fight and a mutual mother's name followed by Mary Sue Lois Lane ends the conflict and turns them into friends
Again did you even watch the film?
I really want to indulge the notion that everyone that hates this film isn't just an upset manchild that can't comprehend substantial themes and doesn't need constant exposition, but every criticism always implies that that is the case

>why didnt she use the kryptonite spear?

She literally didn't know it existed.

>b-but why didnt superman just give it to her

"Hey lady, your rope thing seems indestructible so I'll hold it while its wrapped around the monster and here, take this, the green pointy part will probably kill it so just poke it through. Alright have fun!"

This.

That sounds....about right....And rather boring and generic....Just like MARVEL.

why is the search light bat so fat

>superman is demonstrably good
>but even if you believe there's 1% chance of him turning bad we have to kill him right now

>the horrible criminals batman brands may get murdered in jail
>better kill batman right now then

Their motivations to hate each other were massively hamfisted.

To lower their expectations
>Damn, Batman looks like THAT?

>an investigation that was irrelevant to the plot

The fact that batman what deciding who lives or dies was literally the entire reason Superman wanted to stop him in the first place.

Also, when Bruce is staring up at Superman, it was right after that little girl lost her mother. And when Clark was in the police station asking about the branded human trafficker, he saw the guy's (now fatherless) son. Snyders parallels at work.

So it can be more relatable to Americans.

>ignores that superman only stopped batman from operating because of the murders
>he only thought batman cause of lex
In your defense, you'd have to be able to remember the story at all to know this and you're clearly an idiot

Okay sorry for jumping to conclusions. I share your opinion that the fight lacked complete tension and made no sense why Superman just didn't explain things. As far as the character he was portraying, I find his acting annoying. You could say it's suppose to be annoying and I'd say that's bad writing.

>That's your problem, you don't care about the film, you care about when the next explosion or joke to entertain you is coming
Wrong. The Doomsday fight was an entirety of explosions (and a "I thought she was with you! :p" quip so you can't use 2deep4u as argument. The doomsday fight was the most dishonest part of this film and was purely more destruction porn Snyder added, as was the case with MoS's metropolis fight. Gigantic CGI (that looks like crap) fights are bad, plain and simple. There was nothing good about the Doomsday fight.

>a. the spear only worked by being stabbed into his heart properly which none of them could manage
>b. Doomsday was stronger than all of them and growing ever more powerful
Neither of these explain why she couldn't have done it. The movie never stated she wasn't strong enough.

>did you watch the film
Not an argument.

>She literally didn't know it existed.
She's in the same scene with it. If Superman and Wonder Woman bothered talking to each other at all in this movie that could have been easily accomplished. Poor writing doesn't excuse more poor writing.

>"Hey lady, your rope thing seems indestructible so I'll hold it while its wrapped around the monster and here, take this, the green pointy part will probably kill it so just poke it through. Alright have fun!"
Makes more sense than needlessly sacrificing yourself.

the light is so bright that if the symbol was thinner it wouldnt be seen, just take a flashlight and your finger vs your hand, obv the hand is easier to see than if you held one finger in front of it

>The fact that batman what deciding who lives or dies was literally the entire reason Superman wanted to stop him in the first place.
Like I said, irrelevant to the plot because Superman fights Batman, not because of a personal reason, but because Lex forces him.

>Also, when Bruce is staring up at Superman, it was right after that little girl lost her mother.
So what?

>And when Clark was in the police station asking about the branded human trafficker, he saw the guy's (now fatherless) son.
So what?

This doesn't make the movie magically good. Stop idolizing meaningless parallels. What's next? Both Superman and Batman walk down this one specific ally but one turns left and the other turns right? Pointless. Irrelevant. Pretentious. Crap.

After watching some Marvel films I can't do it anymore. It's the same plot and formula every single time.

I don't care if people think I have shit tastes. I fucking love this movie.

FatBat is a thing.

>Not an argument.
The film makes it very clear that the death of Bruce's parents was the single most traumatic event of his life and that he suffers PTSD from it.
His dad's last word was "Martha".
Bruce spent the entire film looking at Superman as an inhuman alien that could be responsible for wiping out all life on earth. This is even made clear when Bruce says to superman "You're not brave, men are brave"
Bruce spent his entire life fighting crime to ensure that no one would ever have to go through what he went through again

When Superman says "you're letting them kill Martha", it immediately triggers Batman's PTSD. Lois Lane's arrival was kinda an ass-pull, but her explanation that Martha was Clark's mum made Batman humanise superman and also realise that he was no longer protecting the little man as someone else's mum was about to be murdered by evil forces and he was busy fighting for selfish reasons rather than trying to protect said mother

This is all clear in the film
Happy?

>there are people who like BvS

me too

They wanted the THICK crowd.

Yeah, you have shit tastes

But, it is just one man.

Yes, I know that. The movie does a flashback when that happens just to make sure you get that. It wasn't something you could miss.

For the record, I don't mind Superman saying Martha causing Batman to stop (although I do mind Batman's terribly-acted/scripted reaction to it) because it makes sense. But, like you said, Lois' running to the scene and convincing Batman to not only spare Superman, but to ally himself with him was just bad writing. That sort of change, from enemy to friend, takes time. It should not have been a simple switch. It was jarring and contrived. The movie should have ended here.

Balebat actually looks non-shit here.

Batman changes his fighting style the older he gets. He goes from jujitsu ninja to huge bruiser because he's just too old

Seriously, say about his Batman what you want, you gotta admit Bravo Nolan had the best batman logo.

>but because lex forces him

Further proof that Snyder knew exactly what he was doing. Lex knew that Batman would only be motivated to physically fight him by direct confrontation (superman telling him the bat is dead) and the only reason Clark knew about the bat brand was because of a package sent through the mail, no doubt by lex himself.

The returned check with "YOU LET YOUR FAMILY DIE" was meant to remind Bruce not only of his parents but also of Robin. Thats when he decided he wouldnt dick around anymore and made up his mind to kill Superman.

>It wasn't something you could miss.
You say that, but you'd be surprised

>The movie should have ended here.
I disagree. There was more to be told. Superman had to die to finish his character arc started in MoS. And also to allow Bruce to grow as a character so that he could find a new ideal to follow

Batman starts the film bitter and full of rage, he ends it full or hope and trying to be a better person

I meant the emblem lol

>makes more sense than needlessly sacrificing yourself

Supermans entire story is that of Jesus'. He tries to do only good and millions despise him anyway. He knew Doomsday would kill everyone on earth and, like Jesus, he gave his life for the sins of man ("I dont hate the sinner. I hate the sin and yours, my friend, is existing" is meant to be taken both ways. Doomsday is a product of Lexs wrath, envy, and greed.)

Superman dies and -holy shit- is reborn.

Jesus yo.

What the fuck are you talking about? Lex forced the fight by causing Superman to fight Batman. Batman was going to fight Superman regardless. Lex never motivated Batman in the scene. Anyway, you're saying shitty writing is okay because other reasons caused by shitty writing. That's retarded. Lex should never been the one to force the fight. It was contrived.

Oh don't even get me started on these arcs. Superman was always willing to sacrifice himself for humanity the only arc he had was that he was willing to openly do it and I think that was done well enough with the numerous scenes of Superman saving people in the public's eye.

Batman's was contrived as I said with him doing a 180 because of Lois Lane. You could say Superman's sacrifice is what completed his arc, then I'd point again to why he should be so allied with someone just a few hours ago he wanted to kill. It was rushed. I don't think Batman's arc needed to be finished. I think the movie could have easily left off on a cliffhangar and tied it all up in the next movie. Shit, they pretty much did that with Superman in MoS.

>lex never motivated batman

Lets go back to the rooftop scene where he's talking to superman.

"Ripe fruit, his hate. But it did not take much to push him over, actually. Little red notes, big bang, 'You let your family die!'

He was obviously glad when the kryptonite was stolen.

Then again right before doomsday was born

"I gave the Bat a fighting chance (to kill him).

If you seriously couldn't see that Lex was behind everything then i think you should stick with marvel where the plots have the complexity of canned soup.

Jesus fuck try following a conversation. Lex never motivated Batman in these scene. We are talking about this scene. Let's rollback the posts since you seem to have gotten lost:

>The fact that batman what deciding who lives or dies was literally the entire reason Superman wanted to stop him in the first place.
Like I said, irrelevant to the plot because Superman fights Batman, not because of a personal reason, but because Lex forces him.
(You) responded:

>Further proof that Snyder knew exactly what he was doing. Lex knew that Batman would only be motivated to physically fight him by direct confrontation (superman telling him the bat is dead) and the only reason Clark knew about the bat brand was because of a package sent through the mail, no doubt by lex himself.

Lex forces SUPERMAN to fight. He only gives Batman motivation. When Lex forces SUPERMAN to fight Batman, this is what ruined the sub-plot of Clark being a detective. Pay attention. Lex never forced Batman to fight Superman, he only pushed him.

So it would be less good.

this

Them what the hell are you arguing about? We seem to be agreeing on the same thing. Lex was absolutely motivating batman to fight and hopefully kill superman. But he knew superman was too good to kill anyone willingly and thats where Marthas kidnapping came in.

I was saying Superman's subplot to take down Batman was rendered irrelevant to the story because Lex forces him to fight Batman. It would have been better if their fight wasn't contrived. Superman is fully capable of taking opponents down without killing them, too. And don't give me any nonsense that Lex was trying to take down Batman instead of Superman.

I honestly dont think it would have been better because then there would be no point in introducing Lex. And without Lex, no doomsday. And without Doomsday, no wonder woman.

>no point in introducing Lex. And without Lex, no doomsday. And without Doomsday, no wonder woman.
So all the bad parts of the movie would have been cut? Great. Exactly my point.