Can't stand for 4:3 aspect ratio

>can't stand for 4:3 aspect ratio
>cropping the frame is unforgivable

What kino is it lads?

>not watching superior 16:9

Dishonest aspect ratio

>I think the black bars means I'm missing the top and bottom parts.

dumb frogposter.

...

No, it can just look visually unappealing, which you know for film is mildly important

I prefer this superior alternative

or you could throw away your 20 year old TV and join us in the 21st Century.

it's only unappealing if you're a plebeian who isn't used to it

>Not watching Kubrick's films in the intended aspect 4:3 aspect ratio
>He doesn't watch pre-1960s kino
>doesn't watch classic TV shows

What are you even doing here, kys

memes

Actually if they had an old tv there wouldn't be black bars, it would be full screen

It might look like a fireplace, but it's actually a television furniture living room piece.

Are those grilles in the floor beside the TV? What purpose do they serve?

I had to re-buy The Twilight Zone on blu-ray because HDMI stretched it to fit 16:9

Looks great in HD though

>he doesn't watch his kinos in 1:1 ratio

First world countries have this thing called interior heating user.

If film wasn't made to me watched in 4:3, then why is film stock 4:3? Get this widescreen bullshit outta here!

Kubrick intended 2001 to be on 16:9 hence the monolith having the same aspect ratio you fucking little pleb

The Shining, Full Metal Jacket and Eyes Wide Shut are all intended to be 4:3 you fucking little pleb

>a fucking square

Are you blind 2001 is 2:35:1

>>hence
wrong. the monolith's dimensions (1 to 4 to 9) are the first 3 integers squared. source: Arthur C. Clarke, the co-author and -sceenwriter.

isn't that book only though?

They are all meant to be viewed however the fuck you want you little fucking plebbor

>Thinks viewing in the director's chosen aspect ratio isn't the patrician choice

enjoy watching movies in 5:17:1 or however the fuck you want to watch them