SERIOUS QUESTION

SERIOUS QUESTION

Why is everyone just automatically assuming Britain can't exist without the EU?

Why can't they just re negotiate trade and work agreements, and remain outside the EU?

What is the fucking problem with this?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It's_Scotland's_oil
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Elites wanted them to stay, so they ran a fear campaign. Some people bought it, thus they assume UK will implode.

It seems like everyone on the internet bought it, ffs

...

Better serious question, if all the agreements get replaced so that everything stays the same, then what was the god damn point other than massive financial turmoil and a bureaucratic nightmare?

I'm not suggesting everything stay the same

They can run their country again

without fear of repercussion if they don't fall in line

The can deport whoever they want


Fucking retards think immigration policy = economic policy

The wish is father of the thought.

Being part of the EU is a benefit to big business. For the common working class gutter rat in the UK it can in the big picture make life harder for those earning the least amount of money, which make up a large portion of our electorate.

The EU are bitter about the fact we've decided as a majority to vote out. So they will make things difficult for us. French and Germans are all the same.

They'll let every Tom Dick and Paki in to rape and pillage their own country but when we say no thanks they don't like it.

>Why can't they just re negotiate trade and work agreements, and remain outside the EU?

They can obviously but the idea that they will be able to get "better deals" from China, EU, America on their own is dubious since they have so little leverage and no plan whatsoever
They will have to end up following the exact same trade rules but have less input on them now

Because lemmings hear a loud noise in the market and follow each other straight off the cliff. Come Monday I guarantee al the banks will have done their back room Jewry and most of the damage will be mitigated.


The elites trying to punish Britian will be outweighed by the elites who are trying to save money. And in the end the bottom line will always win out

You don't understand

Now the UK has to redo all its order
forms and change EU too UK that will take years and years
to create new files and spreadsheets

>What are non-EU countries
>What are trade agreements without EU interference
>What is souvereignty

>Being part of the EU is a benefit to big business. For the common working class gutter rat in the UK it can in the big picture make life harder for those earning the least amount of money, which make up a large portion of our electorate.

kek
You realize all those "big business" are who provide most tax revenue to the government which is used to pay for your average little Britain right? All those businesses can easily relocate to where they have more input on government leaving poor fags even worse off.

Germany has no sway in the UN.

UK has and if USA or China ever want anything veto'd by proxy they'll be writing us the cheque.

>Malaysia has already offered a free trade deal
>UK is one of the biggest economies
>UK has one of the strongest militaries
>little leverage
>get the same deal everyone gets from the EU
>get better deals with the Americas
>get better deals with Asia
>get better deals with the Commonwealth nations
u w0t senpai

Exactly I'm sure there were sound financial globalist reasons not to have American and Indian independence but they threw off the shackles and are much better for it.

Let's put it this way.
>You run a business (bank, grocery store, production of anything) and you make money via the EU or the UK, by proxy or not.
>You are the 1%.

Everytime a new legislation will be announced, it can end in two ways: it passes or it fails.
Fails mean status quo. Passes mean change.

Now, you're the 1%, you're making decent money via your business. Do you want certitudes or do you want to gamble with your milking cow?

The 1% wants status quo, because they made their money in the current situation. Therefore, they will always shill hard so new legislation fails, especially when it is as big as Brexit.

Hence why there was so much shilling. Once the 1% invest big bucks into the media to promote an idea, it never ends.

It's not "The joooos" or whatever, it's simply a normal reaction to change. The internet is the best vector to spread propaganda.

It required work, and change.
People typically hate doing both of those things.

>he doesn't know that the jews = the 1%

The 1% is quite large. On an international level. Half of the westerners are in the 1%. Within the the western world, people with a salary over 120k (here in Canada at least) are the 1%.

You should keep your eye on the news a little more. There's a massive corporation tax loophole. So this rubbish about them paying the most tax simply isn't true.

Are you just taking it out on me because you're bitter about Trudeau being a cuck for Syrian teen Boys?

>then what was the god damn point other than massive financial turmoil and a bureaucratic nightmare?

They're no longer part of the single labor market. Private corporations can't import social problems from other countries in exchange for cheap labor. That's literally why people wanted out - why do you think people in poor suburbs with low-skilled jobs came out in force? The underpaid, underskilled half of Britain were getting fucked hard because the only jobs they were good at doing (manual labor, trucking, packing, manning the register at your local convenience store) are jobs that can easily be done by pakis for half pay. It's all well and good for university-educated elites to whine and moan about how this will ruin the economy, but a trade surplus doesn't mean shit to the poor bastard with three kids and a wife that's now living next door to a family of gypsies and still looking for work after being laid off from his cashier job in favor of some foreign cunt who lives in a gutter and makes ends meet by stealing his gas and electricity.

>They will have to end up following the exact same trade rules but have less input on them now

They might have less leverage, but at least they have direct input now. Before trade deals had to balance the needs of all EU states, now the UK can happily accept increased export tariffs on, say, oil, in exchange for stronger IP protections or reduced export tariffs on precious metals - if the EU were to do that, it would tank the economy of the netherlands.

The problem is that the EU got really pissed, and wants to punish England for its defiance of their rule.

Actually, the majority of tax income comes from the citizens,and small businesses.
Do you live in a cave? Havent you heard of all the protests about big businesses not paying their fair share of tax? Google,faceberg amazon and the like?
You dont know anything about that?

Norway and Switzerland are rich countries, and It seems they had an advantage for not joining EU in full

the UK has no problems copying them
their oil reserves are ok too
just be careful to not piss off Scotland:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It's_Scotland's_oil

>It would tank the economy of the netherlands

Why? Im genuinely interested and dont understand all the complexities of economics so could you explain that in a way a thicko can understant?

This

ask the people who 'won' what the problem is - because, I have seen happier winners, desu. Oh, I forgot, you cant ask them because, theyve all fucking disappeared - of iutself, a remarkable feat indeed in the case of that fat fucking treacherous self-serving cretin Boris.

>It requires work
this.