OH NO NO NO NO NO NO
OH NO NO NO NO NO NO
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
scaruffi.com
twitter.com
i feel these ratings have been online for a while now
he isn't wrong. a 5/10 is an average and many bowie albums are below average (especially blackstar).
a 50% is an F
not an argument in the context of musical scores
meh. He obviously rates music based on how experimental, difficult and "progressive" it is. Of course he wouldn't enjoy pop artists like Bowie
not me me me me me me
Who is this soyboy?
how can you guys get so angry when melon gives DAMN. a 7 but perfectly content with below 5s on some good albums
>He obviously rates music based on how experimental, difficult and "progressive"
if it actually was like that, he would liked Death Grips and Radiohead more
>radiohead
>experimental
>difficult
What
>
>how can you guys get so angry when melon gives DAMN. a 7 but perfectly content with below 5s on some good albums
Because a 7 is way too high for this mediocre album.
damn is also a 4/10
based, he knows the truth about the superiority of Heroes
This is true.
>how can you guys get so angry when melon gives DAMN. a 7 but perfectly content with below 5s on some good albums
it's almost as if you've been talking to different people with different views
fuckinG
>caring about what Old Pedo Contrarian Italian says
>how can you guys get so angry when melon gives DAMN. a 7
teenagers who listen to memerap on spotify are the only people who care about kendrick or fantano
Personal review standards aren't the same thing.
mfw it's fucking real
scaruffi.com
"When the Old Pedo Contrarian Italian meets The Plagearist Pedo Nazi Jew British Musician"
>he wouldn't enjoy pop artists
>rated a Jim Steinman side-project an 8.5/10
What did he mean by this?
ITT: tnd/p4k brainlets whose heads are as inflated as their conceptions of what a good score is
i'm asian
dooby dam dam dooby dooby dooby dam dooby dam dam dooby dooby dam
Because Scaruffi's standards are different and a 7 from him is better than a 7 from Melonmoth the Youtuber.
This also isn't true at all, it's usual based on the music's feeling or energy like with The Doors and Pere Ubu.
>listening to Scaruffi
>putting any credit to what his autistic self says
wow
i dont agree with Hours, Heathen, Reality or Low
.
based
fake and gay
>Blackstar same score as Never Let Me Down
lmao and people take this guy seriously
quality bait
This seems pretty fair desu
Ziggy, Low and Heroes really are his stand outs
!
What a cunt
zero mercy given
How can Bowie ever recover?
he couldnt :(
Based
But a 6/10 from him means he likes some aspect of the album
While a 5/10 from him means average but mediocre
newfag introduction general
>doesn't say anything negative or at all about the best track (Girl Loves Me)
based
keep telling yourself that when each subsequent Kendrick album sets new sales records with every track.
I never lost control control control control
y is heroes a 7.5 thats way to high and station to station is a 6 scaruffi got it wrong this time
It is just a playlist not rating...
sales dont mean it's good. sales are equatable to hype and marketing.
he still said its a masterpiece
He loves that song cuz that's the song kids were dancing at a his friend's 6 year old daughter birthday party, and we all know he's a pedo
holy fuck lmao
this may be even more embarrassing than his Aqua rating
bummed
kys indiefag, the aqua rating is correct and it is better than ok Computer
>Heroes better than Low
He knows what's up
based Scaruffi
Now watch all the fanboys cry ITT
He likes the Doors, Morphine, Van Morrison, and Minutemen, Bruce Springsteen. Hardly difficult.
i feel like we should have scaruffi's rating system viewable on the front page somehow. maybe just buried in the sticky
>Is another thread of Scaruffi-drones who think they're somehow better than Fantano or p4k-drones
This guy clearly just doesn't enjoy music.
>especially blackstar
He ain't wrong
Bowie wasn't a bad musician, but he was an aesthete first and foremost
50% the minimum border for a passing grade (where I live at least)
Now this is how good bait is done
his argument on bowie is actually pretty fair, that he's basically a privileged charlatan with good taste. b/c he surrounded himself with great musicians he could spend most of his time cultivating his image which is pretty much what hes known for
that said i think a few of these ratings are harsh. hes not really into giving artists good scores if they're like this
>highest rated in Heroes
why does Scaruffi have such bland normalfag taste
Heroes is unironically his best work and only contrarians will deny this
in some educational contexts like grades, sure. but Scaruffi's rating scale is different. the average between 1 and 10 is 5, making 5 the average ranking in his scale.
>Heroes is the highest ranked one
This is okay for me
Normies only know the title song, if you show them any of the Enosque Ambient Tracks they'll be like "Thats just noise user"
wow
Not on the Scaruffi scale. If my music ever got a 6 from him it'd be a bigger accomplishment than a Grammy (yes I know Grammies are a fucking joke)
This is actually a good part of the reason media ratings are so inflated these days.
American kids are taught anything under 8/10 is a complete failure.
I find Scaruffi's tastes often in line with my own. I was well aware for the longest time that Earthling is Bowie's most underrated record by far.