How do evolutionists explain human babies?

They are annoying, smelly, generally ulgy by leaking all kinds of fluids and most of all they are loud as fuck.
If you subscribe to the caveman thing the first natural reaction of the tribe would have been bashing the babies skull in before it gives away the location of the cave to predators.

>another Germanic hates children

wow what a surprise

they are addictive

Name one positive thing about them, that they eventually turn into adults doesn't count.

Well, after hours of screaming from my neighbors flat I can't really say I'm addicted yet. How long does it take?

>literally NOT A SINGLE ARGUMENT AGAINST OP

Children are for idiots

You won't get addicted from watching people do heroin either.

well played!

now tell me how decreasing white population is a genocide.

Not increasing != decreasing

...

That's a bit like saying "name one good thing about cooking. Eating the food doesn't count".

But really being a parent is awesome. Sure, babies are annoying as fuck, but when they're yours you're programmed to love the shit out of them anyway.

Hating your own children is a relatively recent development among decadent whites
Even some of the lowest insects on the planet have a level of "love" for their offspring and protect and provide for them

And how does your degenerate God justify making these ugly babies if he could have designed them a million times better?

Human babies are like compound interest. Starts out slow but eventually grows exponentially.

What the human baby lacks immediately (general movement, need for attention and care until a certain age, lack of strength) it makes up in returns through greater intelligence and cooperation later in life.

forgive my drunken tired explanation

notice how most animals can walk within minutes of birth and humans cant

humans are ultimately walkers by nature, and our intelligences relates to a huge 'childhood' period. but this is counterbalanced by the ability to even squeeze a child out of the hips of a woman (those hips must also travel like crazy)

ultimately kids get born early because of the fact that we were made to run and human hips are terrible at making babies as a rule

w/e tho debate me cunts this bourbon fine

women always carried children with them, and the fathers were generally very protective of the children. Your hormones go into overdrive when you have children, so families would be very close, maybe even closer than today because children were always with their parents and they were never left to cry.

they are cute past 2 years old

unless they're non white

there is no debate, you're echoing high school level biology

>everyone is immortal

In other species infants are not even nearly as annoying.

>How do evolutionists explain human babies?

a 100 pound women pushing out a 100 pound human equivalent or 200 poynd man out of her cooch would destroy her

>If you subscribe to the caveman thing the first natural reaction of the tribe would have been bashing the babies skull in before it gives away the location of the cave to predators.

Infantcide- look it up, yes its a thing we do and other animals do to, namely lions

If a new male lion takes over the pack he will KILL all the children that arent females of reprodutive age from the previous male leader

>wanting infinite growth in a finite world

Because natural instinct and mother protection is a hell of a drug.

atheist scientist here

basically there was nothing, and then science and gravity turned this nothing into everything, which was packed into a tiny dot. and because of physics, it exploded into kittens and babies

so there's an insult, what's the debate

huge juvenile period caused by early birth due to mobility problems, there's my argument feel free to argue or something

You're autistic. Kill yourself.

>arguing like this is something good while being surrounded by marsupials, which have the clearly superiour concept of pushing out halfway done young

nah not superior, it merely is. that's what happened why you mad

Human consciousness is a tragic misstep in evolution. We became too self-aware, nature created an aspect of nature separate from itself, we are creatures that should not exist by natural law

Oh yes only white people. Meanwhile in 3rd world countries, shitskins sell their children/siblings

make babies good goy

>bashing the babies skull in before it gives away the location of the cave to predators
You never heard of post-birth abortion?
Seriously though if you had been paying attention to the explanation of how evolution works you would realise that it fixes this problem by weeding out those infants that don't quite when hushed by their mothers.

>Evolution selects by reproduction
>Babies are essential to reproduction
If anything you are the mutant freak destined for extinction because you don't like babies.

You misunderstand, those shitskins have always done that
This is a new phenomenon for whites though

If we're unnatural, it's even more reason to thrive. Humans whole existence has been to give nature the finger.

basically humans and ther body (the brain) are more advancded then other
if we wanted to have our children to be independent when they came out the womb they would have to be the size of atleast a 4 year old which the human body phycically cannot deal with
so evolution dealt with it by simply making so we got our babys earier and not full grown so the body could handle the birthing however since the baby isnt fully developed it makes it extremely dependent on the mother for feeding etc
basically the human body cannot deal with birthing a fully developed human so evoltuon broke into two parts of being birthday and being a baby/child

fuck im high

Being dependant is ok, but why are they so loud?

it's literally the opposite
>no don't worry about babies, see this porn instead goy

They are loud *because* they are dependant, user.

Women are even programmed to hear their crying noises better and to more easily wake up because of it.

what other way is it supposed to communicate its brain isnt deveoped enough for any other then basic emtions like crying
but yeah your right theres no reason for them to be so fucking loud

If you the development of babies and our caring for them as an external womb then it makes sense. Animals that grow to dominate their environment require lots of attention as infants. Also if I woman were to carry a baby till when they were capable to walk on their own (like many prey animals) then it would be impossible for the child to even be born. Babies heads are growing larger in comparison to shrinking hip sizes of women. Soon in the western world the only way to give birth will be through cesarian section (typically huge fat mexican and black women excluded)

> turning into adults don't count

*looks at flag*

Oh...

women evolved nurturing instincts that makes them coddle their young no matter how annoying. A better question is for christfags like you, why would skygods make babies so annoying and disgusting? Hardly an intelligent or godly design.

Species that have offspring that takes a long (relative to their lifespan) time to mature make use of certain features that evoke feelings of wanting to protect them in addition to the normal maternal instinct.

Be a good Austrian and read Konrad Lorenz. Humans, like other animals, were selected by nature to love their children and to see them as cute. Creating a bond with your child is a natural reaction and I'm quite astonished that there are people who can't unterstand this.

They aren't. Modern babies are loud. Watch tribal people, their babies are silent because they are carried everywhere and suck the breast whenever they want. Modern babies have a single mother dropping the kid off at daycare with some formula before her shift starts. No wonder they cry.

thanks guys

I'm glad some Germanic people actually love their families.

And yes humans obviously evolved to find children cute if you don't find them cute something is psychologically wrong with you.

>before it gives away the location of the cave to predators.
We are the predator

Maybe they are just proxies.

>implying other humans can't fuck your shit up when they learn where you are

>"I hate babies!"

Autism marker No. 278.

Wait, does that mean rabbits and dogs think their babies are "cute"?

Rust essentially finding God ruined the entire ending. What a way to torpedo a series.

Fritzl pls

Babies are stupid they don't expect any predators, it's probably why we built houses and forts.

...

I find them 50% cute and 50% annoying as fuck.

>Jew
>hates children

every time

To save the white race maybe?

Natural law spawned us. And it will remove us as well. Complexity increases to meet the demand of increasing complexity.

They are better than reffugees

Pay your pension

CUTE

You don't eat babies. Are you stupid?

You are autistic and broken. Most socially and emotionally adjusted humans have a biological love for children.

But not manchild autists without empathy who act like sociopaths.

but you CAN get addicted to sex, without having it yourself

Hormones. Even women who didn't want to have the child mostly end up loving it due to their hormons telling them to be a mom.

>Chopping things is releases my stress
>Smells amazing while cooking it
>Get to be creative with ingredients and spices
>Gets ladies panties wet
>Cheaper and healthier than eating out
Babies suck faggot

to test us in his perverse dollhouse game... or something.

yet, not even close to the same level of intelligence.

The price is paid by shitting and screaming useless young.

imagine having a dog that slowly learns how to talk and looks kinda like you

we are already parasites, if we would reproduce more by having cool and actually cute and easy going babies, there would be many more of us and we would be overpopulated many centuries ago.
God or whatever already thought about this.

I used to be a carer for an autistic guy. If we were out and he heard a baby crying he would run up to the pram and try to slap the baby if you didn't stop him.

>100,000 years ago
>there being enough humans outside your tribe in the immediate area to find your fucking cave

are you retarded m8? it was a single tribe for miles on end and the bigger the tribe the easier it is to protect.

>hates children
>calls other people faggots

oh the irony

yes. its why friendlier dogs are so easy going around children and kittens and why you get stories of wild animals raising young from other species.

You literally just said white people have no souls

The cavemen that smashed their babies didn't pass on their genes, you fucking retard

>If you subscribe to the caveman thing the first natural reaction of the tribe would have been bashing the babies skull in before it gives away the location of the cave to predators.

it has already been remarked in the thread that babies left to cry is a relatively modern thing, but I'd like to also point out that we are the killer ape. if a hyena came sniffing towards the camp because a baby was crying, the father and the no less brutal elder brothers of the baby, plus any male bored enough and itching for a bit of violence, which means all of them, would show up with proper tools and cause grievous bodily harm to said predator. there are silly presentations of early humans as defenseless poor creatures, forgetting the fact that we are universal predators and humans caused an ecological catastrophe at every major leap in their spreading over the globe, hunting everything big or vicious enough to extinction usually within a millennium, often in centuries. I'm not even talking about European explorers; american indians and polynesians are the easiest to document, but the settlement of Australia was a butcherfest too, only it happened too long ago. the first austalian aborigines, whoever they were, forced the genyornis and marsupial megafauna into extinction before my ancestors seriously considered hunting the mammoth.