British son: India
French son: Algeria
Italian son: Libya
Spanish son: Mexico
Portuguese son: Brazil
Japanese daughter: Korea, Taiwan
British son: India
French son: Algeria
Italian son: Libya
Spanish son: Mexico
Portuguese son: Brazil
Japanese daughter: Korea, Taiwan
British son: Australia.
I'd argue India was temporarily British son, but India has too much history to be passed as something British (like Indus Valley).
Just because they were under British rule for ~100 years doesn't really make them Britan's son.
Russian Empire was not colonial.
No, Chad is our dear son
>British son: Australia.
Why?
Sure think Igor
thing*
I am France's son.
Didn't the Brits send their criminals down to straya?
DOCTEUR PAVEUL
Don't have money to have colonies you mean. But, yeah, not colonial.
Japanese sex slave: Korea, Taiwan
no, we're french
Not really, no. We got most of the convicts from the colonies in what is now America. The whole prison colony is a historically inaccurate meme, originating as propaganda.
It was a standard land-based empire, not a colonial one.
Gaulish blood in Anglo-Saxon's veins
Did not know that
Australia and New Zealand are our two true sons.
Greek son: everyone
What? The First Fleet arrived ten years after the Revolution, convicts were transported here from Britain because they could no longer transport them to America.
This is what korea in 1930 would've been like if japs had minded their own fucking business.
ELI5: why are koreans so bitter/racist?
No you wouldn't be shit, dumb gook. A Chinese colony at most.
Is that a German colony north of Australia? What's that all about
german new guinea