Was it child abuse? why did it go under the radar?

was it child abuse? why did it go under the radar?

Everyone is a cunt around a horcrux

Effective disciplining methods such as this was ethical in the 80s and 90s, which preventing people from turning into degenerate autists who still freeload off their mother in their late 30s.

Whoa

inb4 pasta

I always wondered, is the family of Harry retarded?. They have a witcher in the fucking house, a boy that would kill them all in a second with only a blink and the only thing they do to him is fuck him?

how is denying a 7 year old kid food for a week a good thing?

it's cheap

It was Rowling stating that Labour don't care about actual problems so long as they can exploit from them.

they hated harry because he wasn't ordinary, not because he was a horcrux.

I think they grow afraid of him later in the series

c'mere harry

make me magic talking tendies right now or else!

but they keep fucking him in every movie.

Having to be the main character in one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises surely has to count as child abuse. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody; just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

*ba dum tis

They were hoping that Harry would never ever find out he was a wizard. IIRC, in the books, when the letters start arriving, they begin to act much nicer to Harry.

>"No!"
Every time

Yes it was child abuse. And no, I'm not talking about Harry Potter the character. I'm talking about poor Daniel Radcliffe, whose parents should be locked up for life for subjecting him to starring in one of the dullest franchises in history. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

He's seething
He's shook

well realize he's rich and that he would go to wizard jail if he just murdered them. Can muggles sue wizards?

They finally give him a bedroom.. that's about it.

>Grapes of Wrath in middle tier
yeah i can see that its an ok chart.

>no meals for a week
But he'll die if he doesn't eat a whole week.

yeah, that graphic of yours can go fuck itself

Stupid nigger

Can't get sued if they can't find a body

Based.

Show some fucking respect.

not if he gets enough fluid. even a little shit like that should be fine for a week without solid food if he doesn't dehydrate.

You don't deserve it dumb coon

Why do people keep saying this stupid shit?
The locket made people a cunt when it rested against their skin. Harry became a cunt as Voldemort got more powerful because the horcrux was inside him.
None of the people around Harry were walking around with their bodies smashed against his scar. Hermione and Ron(most of the time) weren't cunts to him. And Vernon, Dudley, and especially Petunia were all shown to be cunts before Harry even showed up at their house. Petunia even had a whole fucking backstory explaining why she was a cunt. She was buttdevistated that her sister was a cool wizard and she was a boring muggle and went so far as to write Dumbledore begging to be let into Hogwarts. She was a cunt to Harry because he reminded her how fucking boring she is.

except all those dozens of people that were nice to him

child abuse does go under the radar. christ i left school at 13 and nobody gave a shit.

Fair point

Just look at Dudley Dursley... Oh wait

>Having to be the main character in one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises surely has to count as child abuse.
this might be my favouirte one so far.

They're normies