Name a worse movie

Name a worse movie

Drive

Hidden Figures

The godfather

The one you never made because you spent your days shitposting on Sup Forums and procrastinating instead of going out and making something.

gigli
Plan 9 from Outer Space
Sahara

...I'm missing the point of this thread, aren't I?

suicide squad

titanic

Kickassia

Captain America Civil War

2001 Space Odyssey

aryy pot'a

Branded

I can name plenty of worse movies. I can't name a worse Harry Potter movie though.

name a better movie...

Birdman

Christ, I forgot about that shitshow. It managed to bring oscar-bait, actor-meta, and capeshit all into a single package.

>madame president
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAA

Batman vs Superman

suicide squad is infinitely worse

How did they obliviate the entire city with rain when many people would stay indoors?

Rogue One

Just from 2016:

>Civil War (boring af)
>Warcraft (worst fucking piece of shit)
>Suicide Squad

Beasts where shit, but at least ome parts of it were enjoyable.

>tfw no new book series set in the HP world that centers on interspecific relationships
>no magic global shenanigans
>no monster girls

Not that I think it's not questionable to say the least, but I'm pretty sure that the runoff was supposed to get into the taps and into people's faucets, I remember that being a shot actually

this man knows

No country for old men

The entire Harry Potter series.

>there are 5 more movies coming out

the first one wasnt amazing and it didnt light the world on fire like Harry Potter did. i bet they will stop after the third one.

HP was already a popular book series before it became a movie though.

The first one was a boring piece of shit, you can watch the entire movie and not even pick up the main characters name. It has none of the coziness of the original series.

Civil War

>movie made a killing despite having no existing characters, no pandering, no fanservice
>theyll stop after the third hurrr

Sup Forums people really are the dumbest, jesus fucking christ

>you can watch the entire movie and not even pick up the main characters name

Maybe if you're severely retarded.

I'm trying, but it's hard to find something worse than a bloated, unnecessary prequel to the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.