Why is Mourinho trying to ruin football?
Doesn't he know that appeasing to "journalists" and "commentators" is far more important than winning titles?
Wouldn't it had made much more sense if his team had lost, but at least the journalists, commentators and neutral fans would have been entertained by a couple of goals? I mean, really...
WTF is up with his selfish "I want my team to win titles" attitude, what a fucking cunt!
Other urls found in this thread:
twitter.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Just think how glorious it will be when Man City sweep his team aside. Mou only has one plan against top six, parking the bus. City will go up 2-0 within 20 minutes and it will be funny to see him squirm.
But why is it more important to him to win titles than to entertain people at his expense and his team's?
Isn't that a bit too selfish?
If we can take anything from this game it's that he clearly doesn't believe his team is good enough to win the title. He isn't trying to win titles or to entertain people, he's just trying not to lose so he can preserve his own reputation.
It's not just his style of football. He's an obnoxious and antagonistic cunt. Treats people like shit. Blames everyone else when things don't go his way and still demands he is respected despite massively underachieving with his teams since he left Inter.
>Jose "Jose Mourinho" Mourinho
>not doing everything for a headline
pick uno
if he wanted to win titles he shouldn't park the bus against liverpool all the time
Liverpool-United has been a shit fixture for a long time though. Liverpool-Arsenal has been much more entertaining recently.
He should stop playing so conservatively. But if people think 1 point away to Liverpool is a horrible result when your main creator and glue of the team is out, then they're stupid. He needs to pick someone up that can help bring the ball forward, Pogba can't be the only one to do it. Jose should get Ozil, someone who was great for him and started getting even better once he went to the Premier. And Lukaka needs to start firing on all cylinders because these misses here and there pile up.
your probably right, what does Mourinho know about winning titles?
he's such a duche, can't win can't entertain.
Man United play liverpool twice per season
1 win and 1 loss = 3 points
2 draws = 2 points
Jose isn't just boring he's an idiot, England has like a 3 or 4 team title race and he's acting like Liverpool are the lone title rivals.
A 0-0 draw was the best possible result for city and chelsea
>Sem TÃtulo
>not sem titulos
missed opportunity
you think different results don't affect team morale? if they won today without pogba great, but if they lost?
damn!
>ruin football
>mongs like Wenger and Conte go to away games and lose points
>not realizing that after the international break all this shit is definitely going to happen
mongs
>be chelsea
>get crystal palaced
>daily heil can't even cover sports well
What a surprise.
He might go for the win at home, making it respectable 4 points. There is no point risking too much after international break while missing key players. Keeping the unbeaten run for longer is better for muh psychology.
>England has like a 3 or 4 team title race
And one of these lost all 3 points, against the worst fucking team in the league at this point.
>>daily heil can't even cover sports well
Based on what? A fucking headline?
>Leaf football knowledge
Mourinho always played this way against big teams away from home. And he has won a few titles doing this.
Yup.
"Draw away, beat them at home" against big teams is considered a respectable result by title contenders everywhere.
Do people here get their knowledge of save-scumming Football Manager or something where you can win the league with 38-0?
>2 draws = 2 points
What about 1 win and 1 draw?
Thats right, that's 4 points.
And 4 points and 2 points are still better than zero.
It's the international break, big teams are generally going to eat shit away from home after the break because they're missing half their squad.
brainlets like wenger and conte already ate shit and mourinho came up 1 point ahead of 2 rivals today.
>le klopp tried to win game
90% of the shots they took were outside the box and they played without a recognizd striker for 90% of the match.
The whole fucking game was about kicking Ashley Young/Valencia/Herrera and preventing the outlet pass then scrambling around the midfield and ultimately shooting outside the box.
Both sides weren't interested in playing, don't pretend like Klopp wasn't just as culpable.
based mou castrating the marks
>2 rivals today
Come on, even Arsenil fans don't believe it and hope for top 4 finish at best.
Liverpool have only won one of their last eight games in all competitions and have one of the worst defensive records in the league. Man U only managed a single shot on goal in 90 minutes against them, but "b-based Mou" le ebin tactical nous.
>even Arsenal fans don't believe it
Doesn't matter, they're on the same points as Chelsea now and it isn't as if Tottenham just barely scraped past mememouth.
It only goes to show that when hit by injuries Mou knows how to grind out points while other teams just capitulate and lose.
>Liverpool have only won one of their last eight games in all competitions
How many goals Crystal Palace have scored in their last eight games?
he has done this for years and years
get a clue
What have Crystal Palace got to do with this, you strawmanning thick nigger? We're talking about the Liverpool Man Utd game and Mourinho's approach to it.
Why not try addressing the actual content of my post? Do you think you can manage that?
>Most of the media are pro Liverpool
What a Suprise
>absolute inability to see context in his own fucking language
Sad!
>london-based media
>pro-northern team
Oh m80
United are currently second behind Everton in the injury league.
They're playing with 2nd choice players all across the midfield and defence.
Phil Jones was half fit and more than half the team were involved in internationals.
Why not talk about Klopps approach of flooding the midfield with 6 players at home and playing without a recognized striker?
>Chelsea
Oh you
Why does Kloop still deny that if a team parks the bus his squad becomes entirely neutralized?
>I can't argue against your point, so i'll flap about a bit.
Most Journalists grew up while Liverpool were winning everything
>0-0 draw was the best result for City and Chelsea
Actually a loss for Man Utd would be the best possible result for City and Chelsea.
>Parks the bus
There was one team that played with 6 in midfield at home today and 90% of attacks consisted of blasting shots into the stands from midfield.
The point is that previous results don't say shit about today's game. If you don't get that, talking to you is pretty pointless.
Why would he? "My team is unable to cope when others play different tactic" doesn't sound too uplifting.
United are less seriously contendors than liverpool, they've had the easiest possible set of fixtures until today.
As in they're literally last in the league in terms of average position of opponents faced
>United are currently second behind Everton in the injury league.
Pahaha. The only injured player that would have guaranteed a start today is Pogba. Fellaini, possibly, but your excuses are pathetic and desperate.
>Why not talk about Klopps approach of flooding the midfield with 6 players at home and playing without a recognized striker?
When have Liverpool played with a recognised striker?
And yet despite what you say they still managed 19 attempts on goal. The only thing that stopped them taking all 3 points today was De Gea playing out of his skin.
Wrong, but nice try at trying to justify your irrelevant shit, you gormless cunt.
>The point is that previous results don't say shit about today's game. If you don't get that, talking to you is pretty pointless.
Liverpool have demonstrated they are defensively shit. Today they played a team that had averaged three goals a game in the PL and only faced a solitary shot on target.
Mou is a coward. There's no doubt about that at all and today it allowed his rival to open up a two-point gap.
>United are less seriously contendors than Liverpool
>Actually believing this
Plz come back International break so mongs like this can crawl back into the woodwork
This was Liverpool's cup final, hence the butthurt
>the only injured player that would have a guaranteed a start today is Pogba
What about Bailly?
>Still managed 19 attempts on goal
Eat shit, 18 of those are speculative shots outside the box.
>Mou is a coward
Yes while Klopp played with 6 in midfield at home, the brave soul and spent 90 mins shooting from outside the box and kicking players in midfield.
Ah, a Yank with a proxy. Figures.
Crystal Palace has scored 0 games since the EPL began. They still defeated Chelsea.
They don't have Bailly and Rojo, who were their best centrebacks last year and who would have started if both were fit.
They don't have Pogba and Fellaini. Pogba is the heart of the team and Fellaini this year is their best player. Also, last year he was United's most dangerous player against this same Liverpool.
And both Jones and Rashford are not fully fit.
twitter.com
>Statistically the best player on the pitch
>IT WAS ONLY MOU THAT PARKED BUS
>yank with proxy
No but keep changing the narrative because you've run out of arguments.
>both Jones and Rashford are not fully fit
Neither is Lukaku.
...
>Liverpool have demonstrated they are defensively shit.
At times. Didn't they keep a clean sheet against Arsenil and held out alright against City before losing a player? They also showed that they are fine at scoring goals. How many did they score today? Games on a high level can be decided by little moments. Why would you risk losing when your team isn't fully fit, away and misses key players? Besides, Mouyes himself said that he planned to go for counter but couldn't really do it because Liverpool also played carefully and didn't go all out as they usually would.
In the end both teams were fine with 1 point, and being just 2 away from top, there was no point in risking it for Jose. Chelsea slipped hard and City will play lose their points too. If things still look the same later in season, all United would need is to win against City.
>Bailly, Rojo
>starting
Lel
>everyone knows exactly what Mou will do
>Klopp still can't deal with it
>19 goal attemtps
>5 on target
>2 of which was actually in the box and from the same incident
>1 saved by De Gea and Salah shot wide from the follow up
>United had the same amount of clear chances
>Play 6 midfielders at home
>YANITED PARKED THE BUS!
>all these customers desperately trying to defend one shot on goal against liverpoo
>Bailly
>Not starting
Please stop posting anytime.
You think neither of them would start over Smalling?
What about playing 6 midfielders at home?
Which could've decided the game. Points get awarded for wins, not shots or possession.
Pretty happy with a point after looking at other result
t. triggered customer
>claimed only 1 was in the box
>now claims 2 were in the box
>keeps claiming they played a 6-man midfield when they didn't
>tries to blame livershit for man utd only have one shot on goal
Brilliant
They didn't.
>One shot on goal
Liverpoo also had one shot on goal too.
And Matic also nearly scored with a shot outside the box.
Everything Liverpool threw at United were shots outside the box because they played 6 in midfield and got nowhere when they reached the final third. There's a reason why the liverpool right back completed the most passes.
>2 were in the box
From the same incident. Did you even watch the match?
>6 MIDFIELDERS AT HOME REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>They didn't.
see
Coutinho, Firminho and Salah are all midfielders.
t. mong ABU
>Liverpoo also had one shot on goal too.
Fucking state of this Yank who can't into facts
If Klopp signed the players United signed in the transfer window they could win the league
But he's a Mong obsessed with Wingers
>Coutinho, Firminho and Salah are all midfielders
This is top quality trolling. Fucking brilliant stuff
I don't count shitty shots outside the box that are catching practice for any non-mong keeper as shots on goal.
They are though.
youtube.com
Here are the 'highlights' of the match.
Please note the quality of the 'attempt'
>i ignore facts that clearly demonstrate that i have no idea what i am talking about
One team today played to try and win the game and one team played trying not to lose the game.
Mou was lucky that De Gea had an outstanding game.
>tried to play and win
>shooting outside the box and spending all match kicking herrera and matic
Lol no
>They are though.
Mignolet did a pretty good save.
No one is saying journalists aren't idiots, but Mouyes is a hypocritical cunt who criticize West Ham for playing "19th century football" and then revert to the exact same tactics with his billion eur team when it suits him and act as if nothing happened.
They are.
Strikers operate inside the box.
Yeah, one.
And De Gea also only had one save to make.
>he thinks if you're not a striker then you must be a midfielder
>Yeah, one.
Yeah, like De Gea.
The Aussie is right. Klopp played safe as well, even though he needed the points more. Man United literally didn't have the midfielders to go toe-to-toe with Liverpool. At no point did Klooop gamble. He made like-for-like striker changes. Just a song Mou did.
Well you must be considering that every effort you have is outside the box bar one.
They occupy the space in front of the defence, it's no surprise Liverpool's best chances came when Can broke beyond our back 4
He was the only Liverpool player to work this out
Mourinho is no different to Pulis, that's why they're such great pals
difference is Pulis is Welsh and Mourinho is Portuguese therefore gets taken seriously while Pulis never gets a chance at top clubs
>de gea makes 5 saves
>"hurr durr it was actually only one"
>6 GORILLION MIDFIELDERS
Not one of them is a midfielder. You know this.
>England has like a 3 or 4 team title race
Yes, Man U, City and Tottenham. You're deluded if you think Liverpool and Chelsea are title rivals.
>5 saves
Catching the ball easily and stopping it from going into the net isn't a save you mong.
>not one of them is a midfielder
All three of them are. They only played a striker when Sturridge came on.
>Coutinho, Firminho and Salah are all midfielders.
>what is 433?
>where has firmino been playing for brazil and liverpool for the last two years?
Well not after this week thanks to then shitting up their chance to get over United.
>Australian knowledge of football
emarrassing
They're Wingers
>saves aren't actually saves
Weren't they even further from top at this point last season?
Besides, if you don't count Chelsea, why counting Spuds?
see
At no point would you expect any goalkeeper even at amateur level not to make those catches.
They're not saves.
>Strikers
>Don't ever get in the box
Please stop posting.
Not one of them is a midfielder. You know this.
Not being a striker does not make you a midfielder