Let's have one of these threads

Let's have one of these threads.

Test link: politicaltest.net/en

Other urls found in this thread:

abtirsi.com/quiz2.php
politicaltest.net/en
politicaltest.net/en/test/result/92646
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Bumping

Test is kind off, anything right-leaning is just neo-conservative, but other leanings get cool names.

...

Respectable, should be more nationalistic, but whatever. I'm noticing weird descriptions, though.

what does the result mean by this Sup Forums?

...

how the hell did i get Democratic National Liberal?

"Social Patriot" sounds awfully SJWy to me.

I'd say im more nationalistic than most people, but not belligerently.

I think these are based on parties in Germany or something, When I googled my result the wiki page said it was a German thing so I wouldn't be surprised if the others were as well.

Do you think wealth should be redistributed, and that wealthy individuals gained their status illegitimately? You seem like a NatSoc, but the Socialist part should be as minimal and as voluntary as possible.

Nice

Yeah, the names are really weird, not a fan of them. It isn't an English test originally, might have something to do with it.
If you want really good descriptive terms, take this: abtirsi.com/quiz2.php
I got Objectivist Isolationist Anti-Government Ultranationalist Fundamentalist, really happy with that description.

Good, great to hear it.

>Do you think...

Not really. I just answered in a strongly anti-immigrant kind of way. I'm engaged to an immigrant. Go figure.

It's a European website.

"Liberal" in Europe is actually related to liberty.

Welp. Pretty sure that means I'm a literal Nazi. Good times.

Whoops. Disregard.

>politicaltest.net/en

>not being a liberal patriot

I'm an immigrant myself, from Iran, and I answered anti-immigrant as well. In general, it's more of a burden to assume that responsible taxpayers will assimilate. That being said, there are groups which are better immigrants than others; however, this does not take into account the fact that immigrants will vote for themselves and against you, and that they will form communities comprised of themselves. I don't think immigrants should be able to vote or have more than one kid, but that's rayciss.

Why? If you are an immigrant yourself, then good. If you racemixed, then...bretty traitorous, m8.

I'm anti-government and for freedom, just realize that absolute freedom to the merchants and their customers means that you will lose, every time.

aww man top tier. jealous.

...

Democratic national liberal. Whatever that means.

rate me?

Decent, you need more religious guidance, it's not all Catholic foot-kissing.

Isn't Bourgeois Patriot an oxymoron?

>Tfw you're like the only liberal on Sup Forums

I don't know what this means. I know I am not liberal or a democrat all, so it seems the label is off, unless it is referring to something else.

Thats what I thought

Think I got the same.

I think by democrat they mean you hold principles of the democratic party more than the republican party. Not sure if it's in reference to the United States or not though.

tested "Bourgeois Patriot."

...

no

I think it just calls you a democrat if you have a relatively low authoritarian score

I remember the good old days, too.

How so? Is it not like a champagne socialist?

Agreed.

...

This was the first test to accurately describe how I think
I'm no Fedora wearing athiest, I do like religion, and think it has a positive effect on society. I just don't believe the govt should be based around a religion

Oh, then I agree.
Yeah, I really do like the test, here's my percentages.

token leftist reporting in.

Someone has to mock all these societal losers who can't live as individuals so they cling to their race, country, and non-existent gods instead.

I was labeled "social patriot" as well, I think it's just a roundabout way of saying "self-governing with nationalist tendencies" based on my general political phenotype.

abtirsi.com/quiz2.php
>Conservative Libertarian Total-Isolationist Nationalist Liberal

am I Sup Forums approved?

...

Why do people get more Communist than Capitalist? Would you please elaborate on your thought process?

>makes fun of losers
>is slightly communist

The mental dissonance must be crippling.

>communistic 32%
Leave.

what the hell does this even mean?

nah, bourgeoisie just means middle class as in owns capital, or in this case approves of the private ownership of capital. One can own capital and still believe your country is inherently good.

Champagne socialist is just an insult and a pretty meaningless one at that, one can agitate for the public ownership of the means of production and be wealthy. There's no contradiction there

Keynes was (mostly) right != communist.

Nice try though.

Rate me fags

It's not meaningless at all, it reminds that the real conflict is not right against left but top and bottom against the middle.

Bourgeoise is usually thrown around by poor Pinko faggots, though, so in that regard (from their perspective), they are inherently anti-nationalistic (because they hoard the nation's wealth, a.k.a. not retarded whining Marxists). Otherwise, yes. Good point.

Are you Anarcho-Capitalist? Sorry if I aggravated you by asking this question.

...

Kind of.

Interestingly I heard the same from another Iranian immigrant. He said he should work at the embassy and if the application listed their religion as Muslim it should go in the bin. He was Muslim himself, but he was drunk at the time

>communistic
Main reason

r8 me

I got the same thing

globalists having hundreds of billions of dollars worth of capital is not good for the common person.

Capital should be nationalized for the benefit of the people.

A national bank could be run just as efficiently as a private one, and it would be better suited to a nation of the people, not the elite.

Usury is immoral.

Alright, can I ask you if there is a difference between AnCap and Libertarianism? I like the Austrian School and stuff like that, but I believe in regulations because no government is a kike's wet dream to run circles around people, not because they are the most competitive, but because of their practices of usury and manipulation/nepotism, also no morals helps.

Drunk at the time of conversion? jej sounds like a good guy.

Whatever. I'm willing to give up my luxury to give an impoverished person an equally comfortable life.

Kant-tier.

right, everyone will be equal; Equally miserable.

Do I win, Sup Forums?

better dead than red

For you;

Not disagreeing with you, but there are many wealthy people who aren't globalists, who acquire wealth legitimately, and who are necessary to the economic prosperity of a nation. Nobody likes a kike running around with the money, but the alternative is stealing it from both the kike and the successful, moral individual and giving it to unfit people. Generating wealth once you have more money is harder than getting to your first million, why do you think most lottery winners go bankrupt?
I'm on the fence about the whole thing as well, but redistribution isn't exactly a viable alternative, considering historical events and what they suggest is the outcome.

Better than what we've got now. More incentive to improve life on the planet when you are also suffering with the masses.

politicaltest.net/en/test/result/92646

lel, broke it.

bleh if you like, I might be more sympathetic to that view if it were only used in the context of capital owners who gouge their workforce while paying lip-service to socialist values but it gets thrown around so often it's lost all real meaning.

It's a bit like people using pejoratives like "virtue-signalling" to describe people who are you know, just not being assholes

I had the same problem. I guess our philosophies don't have a name.

private property is necessary. I would never advocate the abolition of private property. I just think many industries today that are run by private entities should be nationalized.

but then again I think a lot of things.

The best answer I can give you is libertarians still want some government like the military and police. AnCap dont want any government and let the free market rule everything.

Im definitely see the need for a government with very limiting regulations. Mostly what Milton Friedman says what the role of government is.

Not really surprised by mine

Rate me.

nigger/10

You're basically Russian.

r8 my political preferences Sup Forums

Not sure about nationalization of certain industries because I don't have enough info on what happens after that, if the government gets the final say (depends what government, run by who, etc.).

Yeah, sounds like what I had in mind. I don't like how socially left they usually are, though.

How'd you get that colour scheme? Good results, though.

Pretty much what I expected

Not as well versed in politics, what do you guys think?

would you call yourself a libertarian

Ehh, shits okay I guess. The title sounds kind of edgy.

Anything to the left is degenerate, especially secularism

I cropped it on iPad and it darkened it.

fuck off commie

Muh Freedumz

I was gonna be nuetral to invading other tyrannical governments, but then I thought of my state flag, "sic semper tyrannis", and I realized it was in my nature to kick ass where reasons fit.

You are a bourgeois patriot.

seems accurate. Liberal must have a different definition as it says I'm reactionary

Not sure what to make of my result. A liberal patriot. Hmmm

should monkeys be given freedom of speech

You need a hug bro?

It's european definition I guess.

someone explain this shit to me

FUCK NIGGERS!!!!

Did I did gud?

R8 me please. I want to be cool.

Posting mine from yesterday. Rate.

>enrichment
kek

Fascist here, r8 me

what

ayyy

How am I Sup Forums
?