I just watched this. What did I think of it Sup Forums?
I just watched this. What did I think of it Sup Forums?
Eva Green was too beautiful and it distracted me the whole time.
Does Eva Green show her tits?
If yes, it's good kino.
If no, it's automatic fail.
...
I JUST MARATHONED THIS POSTER AND INSTANTLY DROPPED IT
I haven't seen it yet OP, what should I think about it
It was painfully mediocre. I wonder how are the villains described in the book, because they look like a slenderman rip off.
Nice meme
>the only nonwhite character is a villain
it was very problematic
Really makes you think.
my first thought as well
>a top tier airbender qt will never take you to her secret sunken ship hideout
How do I deal with these feels?
...
>qt
She looks ayy lmao tho
The scene showing the origin of the Slendermen was terrifying. Aside from that it was goofy and stupid. It might have worked as a series of films but I doubt it.
It was pretty fucking bad most of the time.
It had a few genuinely interesting moments like the villain's origin scene and that time rewind thing but it was just really dull. I expected nothing and came out dissapointed because this could have been good.
I heard the books are better.
Why yes, I would have to agree, it is rather dull, but the few bright moments at least keep it from being as dull as the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously, each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
Nice.
this isn't even a HP thread
cringe
samefag
Not enough Eva in it.