Based Ricky exposes Colbert's moronic religious beliefs

Based Ricky exposes Colbert's moronic religious beliefs.

youtube.com/watch?v=P5ZOwNK6n9U

Watching atheists argue religion always comes across as pathetic. Its like punching a baby. Plus in the end the religious person only needs to use the "a wizard did it" argument.

Its kind of like saying you like vanilla ice cream and having someone come up and go on ad nauseam about why chocolate is a better flavor and how your personal preference is wrong.

we've already had this thread today and there were no philosophical breakthroughs

whoa whoa whoa when did Colbert take a break from trump?

>has never said a bad word about Islam
Really makes you think.

Islam is a religion

>Based Ricky

What an oxymoron. The man is a fucking cringey disgrace.

PLAY A RECORD

>ugh he made fun of muh beliefs... CRINGE!!!

I'm not even religious, the man is just /r/atheism in a nutshell. So euphoric.

>going on reddit

I'm not buying Colbert being religious for a second. What a slimy hack

He's a devout Catholic

it's hilarious. His hypocrisy is off the charts.

Speaking of which, COLBERT MADE A RAPE JOKE

The comment secrion's a real cancer goldmine

If you don't believe in God or criticize what I believe then I'm going to attempt to shut down all discussion and discredit you by claiming you wear a stupid hat. Debate over. I win.

This comment screams pure reddit
Fuck the pseudointellectuals who wrote and liked it

Yea being a mouth piece for the left qualifies him as being a critical thinker.

Saying anything bad about muslims or jewish in the current year would ruin public image and kill his career.

So its a smart thing to do even if it makes him a hypocrite

if he was a critical thinker he would have been red pilled by Sup Forums into thinking god was real, like any sane person.

ricky is honestly the most ignorant celebrity

Is there a reason for that discussion? In the video it seems to come out of nowhere.

oh cool, he knows how to speak like an "insightful" facebook status update

Why cant he just accept that some people are religious? What does he benefit for arguing with religious people.

Did a priest molest him as a child or something?

Anytime someone says science proves or proved something their science teachers should lose their jobs. If the fact that science only confirms the most likely outcome hasn't been made clear to you by adulthood then your science teachers failed you. There being a god is a possible outcome, but it's not a very likely one. That's to the extent anyone should waste their time "arguing" about religion.

ughh I thought we had moved on from this pointless 'religion vs atheism' thing by now

its not really relevant anymore, especially as it became clear that post-Hitchens 'youtube atheism' had become effectively commandeered by reddit and the social justice movement rendering it an embarrassment

>Why cant he just accept that some people are religious?
He does accept that a great majority of the people on the planet are religious. Accepting something is not the same as agreeing with it.
>What does he benefit for arguing with religious people.
Maybe he hopes to change their mind and to have them really look into their belief system. Remember that religion is something that people are sucked into at a young and impressionable age, so most people blindly accept things.
>Did a priest molest him as a child or something?
Funny you mention abuse of power. That's one reason to argue against religion as it's basically a form of government where certain people hold great power which opens up the door for abuse and corruption. It's not even like we need to look to far back to see examples of religious institutions abusing their power.

Colbert isn't religious you twat.

So is Ricky only against organised religion?

The new Atheism movement really died down a few years ago. Nobody cares anymore.

>How dare the leader of the Catholic Church be humble!
Atheist Sup Forumsacks are way worse than religious ones.

he's catholic

>assuming all immigrants are muslim
das raciss

Cuck

wtf? why is Sup Forums full of catholics?

Wow great argument fagtron you sure convinced me with those hot opinions

I'm not Ricky, so I can't speak for him, but for me that's where shit starts to hit the fan.

Who else would have been posting all that Blacked porn and CP?

And the left continues alienate whoever is left on their side. Keep it up.

hmm yes hmm yes well memed indeed

Ricky Gervais is a fucking idiot. I can't believe how stupid atheists actually are.

So he's actually trying to help people?

He's not doing it just to stroke his big ego and try to make him look "intellectual"?

That's such a shitty food analogy.

>be le me debating Sup Forumstard about racism
>him: well actually most blacks are killed by other blacks so facts > your opinion
>later on in another thread...
>me: there's no evidence to support any of the claims made by the bible
>him: muh feelings, facts are irrelevent!!
What the fuck?

Its probably the Sup Forumsacks. They are wannabe catholics.

I kek'd.

This is literally like those J.K. Rowling banter photos in video form, where its like I couldn't give a shit about if the person who is being bullied get destroyed so its whatever. Colbert deserved to get his cage rattled.

That said I think more people should be Christian so that we don't go into a Dark Ages 2 when Islam takes completely over, so I don't respect the views of Atheists as I think they are turning people away from good things so that they can only go toward bad things which is what is happening in the UK.

>There being a god is a possible outcome, but it's not a very likely one.

If the Universe is as big as we observe it to be there are very likely many God-like creatures. If the MWI is correct then there are not only infinite Christian Gods but there are infinite universes where you are the Christian God, user.

The possibility of there being 'a God' is exceptionally likely.

Take care my good man

Francis is a heretic.

Not every user you talk to is the same person, ya shitty troll.

conversation was about God in general and not a specific religion. Criticism of Islam has been hijacked by genuine racists who think sikhs are Muslims too.

No the Sup Forumsacks are edgy atheists

/his/ and /lit/ are the christian/catholic boards

...

If we could stop memeing for a second no one here actually believes in God right? I mean it's obvious why Sup Forumsacks say they do because it's about muh superior white culture, look at this pic of a fresco on the sistine chapel. But no one here actually believes there's a guy who sends you to a bad place if you do naughty things right? Do you believe Santa won't give you any presents if you're naughty too?

absolutely wrong. Sup Forums are tradionalists scared of "degeneracy" so Christianity is the necessary route for them to go.

>I believe in a magic old man in the sky

gervais is just that much of a cunt

[a bald man nods respectfully toward you in the background]

maybe he was baptized, doesn't mean shit

Geez, why was Steve so aggressive about it.
>why is there something instead of nothing
>well I think t-
>WHY IS THERE SOMETHING INSTEAD OF NOTHING

>I don't respect the views of Atheists as I think they are turning people away from good things

This. Atheists are walking voids only beholden to themselves and their personal pleasures. That's why they're such a small minority mostly found in wealthy countries.

>But no one here actually believes there's a guy who sends you to a bad place if you do naughty things right?


There isn't one Christian on the planet who believes this. One of the core concepts of Christianity is that he's unknowable, human beings aren't supposed to be able to comprehend him.

When 2 years ago i went to Sup Forums for one week field trip the whole board was swarming with wannabe catholics.

I guess Sup Forums has changed since then

>thinking atheism and nihilism are the same thing

why do Americucks always make this mistake?

>Atheists as I think they are turning people away from good things
>Atheists are walking voids only beholden to themselves and their personal pleasures
Stupid atheists and their pleasures.

Religi-cucks BTFO

>le superior intelligence atheist brethren like myself

I thought fedoras were laughed off the internet but posts lke these remind me oblivious people still exist?

Do you realize everyone is laughing at you?

How do you give life objective meaning without religion or belief in a higher power?

>Christianity and far right ideals on the rise

What fucking year is it?

>But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
>And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.
>For the wages of sin [is] death; but the gift of God [is] eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

Believing in a "God" is fine. Believing in the words of man is retarded. God is not a man in the sky. The bible is not real. God is a concept that we can't comprehend. Nature and Science don't disprove god, it is god.

Just kidding Clapton is GOD.

what you believe is dumb and i'll never stop mocking you. sorry if that hurts your feelings. maybe you should find a safe space where people aren't allowed to disagree with you.

>Stephen Colbert
>Ricky Gervaise

>Christianity on the rise
That's patently false.

>So he's actually trying to help people?
Yes, I think he is because in the long run if you can't make sense of your beliefs and defend them then they aren't yours. Of course, if you can and then you're a better person for it.
>If the MWI is correct
The problem there is that there is no way to test this theory out. Technically speaking it's both true and untrue, and ultimately pointless for each of us. In the context of whether or not there is a god then there is and there isn't and along with that there are an infinite number of splits from there. The fact that we could be living in any one of these realities is what makes it all so pointless to worry about. There is no evidence for god, so therefore not worrying about it is the best possible option until such a time that one we can determine it's existence and two communicate.

What? You don't use comedians as the best source for your news and the shaper of your world view?

ice cream? god I love ice cream!

>Trump is president
I think we are past the point where celebrities were just there for entertainment purposes and what they thought was a non-issue.

Enjoy your steak. I'd rather be unplugged than a weak blue pilled fool.

Religious people B T F O

>That said I think more people should be Christian so that we don't go into a Dark Ages 2 when Islam takes completely over
me too, i respect christian from a political point of view

i prefer peanut butter ice cream

why the fuck does he wear those glasses? his old ones were so much better for his face

Why, evangelical atheism is just another religion.

nigga teaches sunday school

Gervais needs to read some Eco and his whole ideas of being secular vs being an atheist.

>red pilled by Sup Forums into thinking god was real
God is dead
Praise kek

without external morals, anything you do is ultimately selfish
I mean you can argue that it is regardless, but if every reason you have boils down to "because that's what I think" then your morals are ultimately selfish and self-centered
that's not to say you're either religious or selfish, but I wouldn't go putting him on any pedestals

The important question here is why do you keep making the same fucking thread?
Do you need others to validate your edgy opinions?
Are you 13 years old?
Do you like death metal and hate pop music?

It was more than one question, but i think they are all important.

so Sup Forums is actually gullible enough to believe that a guy who defends abortion and kisses another man on live TV is a """"Catholic""""?

According to Carlo Maria Martini (Jesuit, Cardinal of the Catholic church), religion changes from time to time; catholicism isn't the exception.

American Catholics love using the "no true Scot" fallacy. I'm sure many reject the idea that the Pope is even Catholic since he's not conservative enough.

The way Gervais and those guys oppose religion is like a smart 12-year old would do it
cringe

Basically. Only one of the Dawkins clan who does it without being *completely* condescending is Michael Shermer.

If you're a Catholic, then to speak against him is heretical.

He isn't the messenger of God. He is a false voice.

It depends if he invokes Personam Christi in which case you have to consider him as Christ himself. It's fairly rare and probably wouldn't ever be done today. Otherwise he can be charged in canon law.

How do you know? Is it because he tries to act Christ-like which is counter to what Americans do?

>False voice because he peaches actual Christian values as laid down by Jesus, like 'love thy neighbor' and 'turn the other cheek'

You literally cannot get more Christian than preaching the true and pure word of Jesus.

Morals are supposed to be internal and universal. If they are external then it means that you can adopt whichever one you want that suit you and therefore there is no point to it. If we aren't all being held to the same standard then it seems like a waste of time to judge anyone else on their morals when we are all just selfishly going with the ones that best suit us.
The moral thing should be independent of our personal desires is what I'm saying.
Regarding Ricky, I'm just pointing out if you're going to make a proclamation that you have enough knowledge to back up your claims. It's the problem that I see with the current state of the world where people post things that allude to their knowledge on the matter, but don't know shit when asked to explain their point of view. The best example is when people use memes as a response.