AHAHAHAHA

AHAHAHAHA

FLOP OF THE CENTURY INCOMING

youtube.com/watch?v=vScUbKoE-qs

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=e3Nl_TCQXuw
variety.com/2016/film/news/jungle-book-disney-warner-bros-remake-1201755271/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

If tarzan didnt do great neither will this

Does the lad actress of this musical even sing?

All I've heard of Watson thus far is a 30 second autotuned clip

God the beast looks retarded in this

youtube.com/watch?v=e3Nl_TCQXuw

hahahahaAHAHAHaahahaa

this movie is so racist.
black people arent that ugly.

It's being advertised as a movie for 5 year olds in my country. I don't think it's even supposed to be any good. Stop making threads about it.

Is the joke supposed to be that the Beast is played by a black actor?

Cuz he's not

If this flop will Watson finally fuck off?

>literally just a cover of the end credit song from the animated movie
>over 60,000 likes

Furry propaganda.

>kid flick

It's going to make a billion and Watson career is just as a done for as if it flopped. This is Minions tier so you know what to expect

She's technically already fucked off, she took a break from acting a few months back but this and that circle movie finished production by then.

We can only hope, though I think she has a few more years of Harry Potter reputation to coast on left.

>I wish I did La La Land

Why say this before your own movie is out

>flop of the century
Sadly, no.

you know there are people paid to click likes right?

John Legend is so much better than this.

Why John?

they backed a dumptruck load of money up his driveway

what was he suppose to do?

the sad part is this will probably make a shit ton.
I think all of the live action re-imaginings so far both make a shit ton and get 1 oscar nom.
Cinderella, Maleficent, Jungle Book, etc.
Given the director and the style this looks like it'll tap into the Twilight audience pretty thoroughly, although Fifty shades may take up some of that instead. Whoever succeeds, it's a lose lose for us anons.
tarzan was WB scrub. Jungle Book was pretty similar and it got 30 shy of a billion worldwide.

Cringe thread? This film is so hype only basement dwelling neets would say it would flop. We get it OP you hate Emma Watson AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

This will gross a billion and you will all still say the same shit

john carter was the most hyped film in the history of film hyping

The ticket sales are already rivaling avengers. It'll probably make jungle book money. Kids and middle aged white women will eat this shit up

>Twilight audience
Bro twilight audience are already 27yo+ wtf are you talking about this cashes in 18-25yo girls

>john carter was the most hyped film in the history of film hyping

Is today opposite day?

nice joke jc floped because of the weird marketing

Your dad loves you

She took off 2016 for filming and filmed three films in 2015

dan stevens is better than this, better than all of it

The zach attack is about to start lads
get ready for pretending emma watson isn't a shit actress and la la land spam

at the time of its release it was the largest marketing budget ever by a huge margin and it did nothing to help the film succeed

this film looks really bad no matter how many times you see an ad attached to a bag of tangerines

1.- It won't flop, Disney will buy reviews and spend the usual 300M in marketing so it doesn't. We are here everyday we know how it works

2.- It will be shit. Like unwatchably bad, those trailers and song are destiled cringe

3.- Watson's career is over. You don't recover from making pieces of shit like this, no way Aronofsky will call you again.

Name one thing he has done since Downton Abbey that people actually give a shit about.

the guest

Unfortunately it'll make money and justify the continued recycling of old movies. I know a lot of girls who really want to see it because they 'member the nice songs.

So fucking 90s. Love it.

>It won't flop, Disney will buy reviews and spend the usual 300M in marketing so it doesn't
Tell that to Moana.
Otherwise I agree with you, but Disney films do flop if they are bad.

Sup Forums not only is gradeschool retarded they seem to be the exact same as tumblr, guaranteed bank

noah is objectively aronofsky's worst film. 5.8/10 on imdb

the only reason it received moderate success at the box office is because of the source material, church goers and russell crow. like every film emma watson has ever been in, you could replace her with any actress and the film would not be any better or worse

Hermione is a fucking furry?

It won't flop, it will make a shitzillion dollars.

Personally I didn't care much for Maleficent or The Jungle Book at all and yet they made plenty of money and got praise everywhere. I think these movies are just not made for me.

it will make tons of money despite being shit. how is this surprising?

nothing will ever match the magic of Cocteau's version anyway.

Disney Live-Action Remakes
They're the new DisneyToon Sequels

>90s
>The blue-orange easy pandering
>The CG
>The flamboyance on the costumes

Boy the only thing I see from the 90' here is Emma Watson.

>Is Hermione fucking a furry?
fixd

>turning La La Land down to make this turd

HAHAHAHAHAHAH

The trailer really highlights wow bad an actress emma watson is.

Sure, but that movie is going to look like Casablanca compared to this. It looks great on her CV having worked with Darren even if the movie was bad, but no one will take her seriously after this shit

>It's a Sup Forums picks on Ariana episode

Noah had mixed reviews and pissed off bible thumpers and still grossed $400 mil, religious movies usually don't gross a lot. This will gross $1B easy kiddies are gonna see it multiple times and I believe she will have grossed 9.4~ billion. She will get to 10 billion soon enough.

fake news, she didnt turn shit down. she was never offered the part

sersha waifu fags like to claim she turned down roles in star wars too but theres zero truth to the claims

publicists like to leak scant details about auditions and conversations when other movies are successful that links their clients to them. its odd you never heard anything about this till after la la land was a success

>Noah had mixed reviews and pissed off bible thumpers and still grossed $400 mi

yes they paid to go see what was wrong with it so they could cry about it. box office take means dick in the modern age of digital media. its digital sales are abysmal

Glad she turned down la la land for this, la la land was written terribly and had bad songs. She also virtually played the same character already in ballet shoes.

>. its odd you never heard anything about this till after la la land was a success

That's because it wouldn't be news if la la land flopped...

WRONG

fake news

Why are watson fans such tasteless mongrels?

Because there was no hype for la la land. Watson thought she would be better off making a CGI kid flick for a fat check and now she is crying because she has committed career sepuku

Sad!

thats their porn collection

Why is it winning all the wards?

not that guy but im sure his reply will be that hilarious meme image of the cartoon character rubbing his hands together

this desu

I refuse to believe watson was even considered for an actual movie.

This is fucking disgusting honestly, Disney executives should be quartered for these "epic live action" remakes.

Didn't they learn their lesson from Jungle Book being a piece of shit?

>positive ratings
>made almost a billion dollars

>Maleficient is shit
>Alice in Wonderland is shit
>Beauty and the Beast is shit

I mean I know it's Disney and they only care about money but they aren't even trying anymore

>didn't they learn their lesson from jungle book being enormously successful?

>trailer literally shows the entire movie
welp. Guess don't need to see it after all.

The backing track you moron.

It's Beauty and the Beast dude, not Game of Thrones

>Maleficient
>Budget $180 million
>Box office $758.5 million

>Alice in Wonderland
>Budget $150–$200 million
>Box office $1.025 billion

>click likes
What does that accomplish?

I heard they're even doing a live-action Lion King.
With an all-CGI motion capture cast.
On a green screen set.
In fact, it really isn't live-action at all, is it?

people like you use it as a measurement of success

Jungle Book was good. Not great, which it could have been, but still a solid movie with some good scenes and characters.

>Disney only cares about money
>some shill posts box office numbers

Like clockwork

you left out the marketing budgets and the box office GROSS is NOT the NET

they had to pay to print it, distribute it and the theaters showing it take a huge cut of that box office gross

>66,550 likes
>2,106 dislikes
"HAHAHA, IT'S GOING TO FAIL SO HARD! THIS IS THE END OF WATSON'S CAREER!"
- t. Drumpfkins virgin

ariana grande and john legend have fans

they could take a shit and people would click like

>imdb matters
Have you seen the top 25

Noah was kino

>imply a movie failed
>show that it was a financial success
>LOL LIKE CLOCKWORK

What did you expect exactly?

I say they were shit. Of course a movie with a 400 million dollar marketing budget will gross some money

didn't alice in wonderland 2 bomb? i don't care enough to check

>they didn't even bother to make a music video

i guess they don't want to throw good money after bad

A lot of us still like Emma. Whether or not the movie is shit is what matters.

>New CGI IP vs B&B
Probably not user
Also Moana did just fine senpai

holy fuck fuck how did they manage to fuck up tale as old as time this bad?! they could have had the next frozen let it go hit right here (imagine all the kids that haven't heard it before and the nostalgia for parents), jesus fuck, this sound like an autotuned karaoke version

it's staggering

>FLOP OF THE CENTURY
>It won't flop, it will make a shitzillion dollars.

Doesn't matter either way, they don't give a fuck because that's not the point.

Disney's focusing on live-action adaptations of their animated properties whose entire story was ALREADY in the public domain when produced. It's not about making money from those properties, it's about interfering with other studios possibly adapting them to their profit, like the first queen emerging from the hive systematically killing all the others that haven't awakened yet:

"Does Disney’s ‘Jungle Book’ Success Spell Trouble for Warner Bros. Version?"
variety.com/2016/film/news/jungle-book-disney-warner-bros-remake-1201755271/

You know what you're NOT going to hear much about? Live-action adaptations of Moana or Brave because there's no risk of another studio being able to do them instead.

John Carter died because of something highly arbitrary inside Disney where executives who pushed Mars Needs Moms tried to save face by insisting the word "Mars" in a title equaled box office death (instead of admitting MNM's fuck-awful visual style frightened children).

So, a movie whose title implies the plot (boring-named Earther John Carter somehow becomes a lord of another planet and just how did he get there in the first place?) had its title neutered to the main character's name.

In case you're keeping score, in order for a movie whose title is merely the main character's name to catch fire, the actor needs to be a household name renowned for playing a particular type or if that's not possible, the title's the same as a recent NYT bestseller all your friends read.

Disney shot itself in the foot repeatedly with JC. (Also, the novel goes on record that the women are topless so you're pissing off the people who read it)

STOP POSTING THINGS THAT DISPROVE MY HATE FOR WATSON AND ARIANA IS SHARED BY LITERALLY EVERYONE

her """""career""""" was secured for the next 100 years the moment the first harry potter came out.

She also can't act for shit, but that's not the point.

I don't like Emma's politics, but aside from that I don't care about her whatsoever.

more like cantactson