What explains this disparity?

...

plebs

You have to make a really big undeniable pile of shit to get below a 6 on IMDB.

The first movie is about fucking druggies up, so some people took it as an offense. They even threaten to ram a broomstick up a college student's ass.

Because the last two are full of edgy retards who think police brutality (when required) is bad, or straight up cops = pigs.
The more important question is, who was the one getting cucked in ES2, Beto or the professor raising his wife's son.

Fun fact: the lead actor is a commie cuck and despises his character. He thought other people would fee the same

IMDB is only good for looking up films for the cast and the trivia. Everything else about the website is a complete dive, the ratings are meaningless and the boards are shit, and people wonder why they're shutting them down

Elite Squad makes marijuana look like heroin.
Probably because all of the dude weed lmaos can't deal with the reality that the drug causes harm.

Clannish behavior of humans. People tend to only use one set of websites and abhor "rivals". Because there is a division, there is also a division of opinion over what one website's regulars like when compared to another website's regulars.

Thus, one site likes a specific type of movie while another site dislikes it.

>meta critic
fags whor review shit for a job
>imdb and RT
fags who write reviews for a hobby, boredom, or to troll...
I woulldn't really take those scores at face value at all as most who have reviewed it have an agenda.
Best thing to do is read paragraphs of reviews or watch the damn thing yourself and make up your own mind

when are people going to realize how shit rotten memeatoes is?

RT's score doesn't give a rating, it gives the percentage of critics who gave positive reviews.

It's an excellent film either way. The political stuff wasn't even that bad, you make your choice with them.

i want nothing to do with the dum dums that dont think elite squad is great....the sequel im not crazy about though

IMDB = user rating
Rotten Tomatoes = percent of critics who like it
Metacritic = average critic rating
Thus they are different

IMDB ratings are like video game ratings, 7 is "average".

That system applies to everything
You don't see 53% and think average even if that is what it should indicate, nobody does

niggers

Hey, what's up

But IMDb is especially bad for it's rating spectrum. 8.3 is basically SPECTACULAR and 6.3 is pretty damn bad.
On most 1 - 10 rating then really bad should be 1-4, mediocre should be 5-6, good should be 7, and great should be 8-10. IMDb's ratings are only based in the 6-8 spectrum which is a problem.

>you make your choice with them.
This.
Also
>hear that its director was going to work on the robocop reboot
>excite.jpg
>thought I would see BOPE shit except in Detroit and with a robot slapping criminals' shit, sometimes literally
>"""robocop""" happened
I'm still mad

Poor guy didn't realize the studio would dictate everything.

What site?

>looking up trivia on imdb is good
Lmao, no, it's not. A lot of it are unsubstantiated claims with sources(links referring to websites which mention an interview where you found out about this trivia, website only paraphrases other website, interview nowhere to be found.)

So who's the cuck, Beto or his wife's new husband?

>having 5/10 things correct in a test
>implying that is good, average whatever

TROPA DE ELITE OSSO DURO DE ROER

The college kids were insufferable

I am pleased and surprised that those alt-right niggers haven't latched on to these movies yet. The college kids in the first movie and the professor on the second one are literally their hated enemies.
>implying most of them were old enough to use the internet when the first one was released
It also has cucking so it should be their favorite.

Because Tropa de Elite shows the reality of Brasil, and the biggest problem americucks have is getting the wrong coffe in Starbucks.

>chat brazilian women (women) over at interpals
>ask them about TDE and if it's accurate
>uni student says it's accurate
>court employee says it's actually toned down
kek

The lefties messages they are trying to spout are really stupid.

First movie was actually saved because of Pablo Escobar. His character in the movie was a minor role, the other 2 newbies were the main characters, but the movie was shit and Pablo scenes were better, so the director decided to re-edit fucking everything and it went ok.

Second movie is trying to put leftie shit as right over there and is a big fuck you to the fans, who liked the movie because druggies getting BTFO in the first one.

The first one was about him trying to find a replacement. A good chunk of the movie was about him dealing with balancing family and work.
The second one doesn't try to "put leftie shit as right." You could tell that it is subtly mocking it when you view the lefty message with the whole film, like the first film.
Seems like you're just looking for things to get mad about.

I'm still pissed they killed off __Matias in the second one

catering to plebs = high IMDB score

see: boondock saints

plebs can't tell the difference between greatness and being pandered too because they live in their own little irrelevant plebeian world

It's fucking amazing to watch people discuss this movie, because neither yanks nor Hues seem to have any idea what the fuck the film is about.

Hint for retards: It's not conglaturatory violence dumbasses, there's a reason Nascimento is shown having nervous breakdowns.

Is Fabio /ourguy/?
>It's not conglaturatory violence
This. It's main point isn't HURR DRUGS R BAD nor DURR LEFTIES ARE RETARDS. It's about one guy living his life trying to do right despite the shit he is in.
slapping druggies and denying their last request for an open casket is just a bonus