Why are these countries so incredibly shit at colonization? What's wrong with them?

Why are these countries so incredibly shit at colonization? What's wrong with them?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_colonisation_of_Nicobar_Islands
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>Quebec
>Shit
Second most powerful province of Canada

If you replace Spain with France or Italy in Latin America it would've been better

>"""invade"""" Albania for 5 years
>"Yeah we totally colonized Albania"
Shitalians everyone

Quebec is only good because of Anglo Canada, tho.

What makes you think that?

See Quebec, Argentina and Uruguay (the latter two heavily Italian influenced)

The succesful countries like Algeria, Morocco...OH WAIT

French Africa has a lower homicide rate than Latin America

...

>with France (...) in Latin America
>Haiti, French Guiana, Martinique, Guadeloupe, Saint Martin, Saint Barthélemy are part of Latin America

correct.

No they'd do just about the dame thing more or less.

They are part of it.

no shit, we didn't kill b*rbers to replace it with frenchmen.

They wouldn't have raped the natives. French people are crazy Catholics either.

>"Yeah we totally colonized Albania"
We'd never try to steal Turkey's accomplishments

Is French now a Germanic language with a Germanic culture?

Only slightly, and most of it is worse off than LatAm in every other way.

t. the eternal anglo

Turkey's colonies are having a better time than you tho

>French
>not raping
They literally had a designation for the mulatto population they created in the Caribbean.

Colonization breeds shit places

Why is every single ex-British colony amazing compared to the other Euro countries?

>Mexico and Latin America aren't that bad outside of memes, compare to Africa, India, the South Pacific, etc.
>Our current issues are not Spain's doing, it's been over two centuries get the fuck over it.
>Stop making these fucking hate threads

>what is pooland

Yep, Syria and Kosovo are great places

>unironically banging black "females"

wow

Croatia,Slovenia, Saudi Arabia are better
Everyone can cherrypick Shitalian

>Saudi Arabia
>good in any way

>Slovenia
>Turkish colony
Analbanian education, everyone
>Saudi Arabia
>good at anything that isn't funding terrorists

>we aren't that bad compared to countries whose populations were thrust into the Western-made modern world with almost no preparation and that gained independence last century, plus some resourceless islands
Shouldn't this make Latin America even more mediocre?

The question is:

Was the rest of the world even trying ?

What do you mean mexico?

I think Slovenia was never in Turkish hands, unlike a part of Croatia.

totll tru bro

Mexico, as well as other parts of Latin America, have a track record in regards to messing things up for themselves **cough cough** attacking the United States **cough cough**

I mean, Spain was brutal but effective. France was not very efficient in regards to how they managed their territories, but managed to control a shit ton of territory across the globe.

But yeah, the English and The United States are are far better examples of colonization and control of distant lands.

Latinas master race btw.

Only if you're an edgy self hater with no real understanding of history, Latin America will for the most part become fully developed by the mid century, so less than a century after Europe starting on much worse conditions.

Yes, I do realize you're dishonest and don't care for actual arguments.

Pancho Villa did nothing wrong malinchista motherfucker

this is silly. the darker the inhabitants of those colonies are, the shittiers those colonies become. everybody used the same recipe for colonies. what determined the outcome of the colony was genetics.

Completely different polices and investment user.

>spain was effective

>the eternal anglo is already making everybody believe that his only colonies were USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand

>le MEXICO/ARGENTINA/BRAZIL/COLOMBIA SUPERPOWER BY 2050
More like 20050 LMAO

as they were adapted to the inhabitants of those colonies. the african colonies of the UK are shitholes.

They're really the only colonies to have significant influx of actual Britons who helped shape the basis for the country they're living in now. The British empire set up other countries with parliaments, the English common law system and railways. It's up to them to govern themselves and make it work after independence.

>tfw latina gf

i'm under the impression i wouldn't become a mexican citizen if we got married. bummer.

>brutal but effective
Yeah, effective at exploiting. Also, to be fair, half the land France controlled in Africa was desert and they also lost tons of shit to other countries.
He's an American white guy living in Guadalajara.

I think you mean they are the only countries where the influx of actual britons completely overwhelmed number of natives

Anglo Africa is better and more relevant than French Africa (excluding the Magreb) or Portuguese Africa, same with the Middle East.

Other former colonial powers don't even have a decent banter session with their mates once every 4 years lmao.

They conquered the entire continent and controlled it for years, virtually every country besides one speaks Spanish. I would consider that rather effective.

>Pancho Villa did nothing wrong malinchista motherfucker

Yo no soy hablando de Pancho Villa amigo.

You folks attacked us starting the Mexican-American War, thus losing half your territory.

Why not?

>he darker the inhabitants of those colonies are, the shittiers those colonies become


My country was the poorest and most dangerous colony of spain.

Well duh.

anglo africa is as much of a shithole than french africa despite being moslty christian, the only thing they got for themselves are their large population

how are you contradicting me here?

Muslims ruled over Spain longer than the Americas was under Spanish control.

Homicide rate in latin america si due to drug conflicts and aztec heritage

>My country was the poorest
Sure

>and most dangerous colony

Bullshit, not tropical bugs, and most of the indians were friendly aside from some stoneage indians that never truly lived beyond Maule.

>French people actually believe this
Quebec is worse than maritimes tier and wouldn't survive without muh equalization payments

>Romania
?

muslims were effective

No.
The problem doesn't has spainard empire you moron. The mistake was those indians and mexicans that want to independize. We were pretty fine in colony times but now we are a shitholle thanks to those stupids

El imperio español era potencia el problema fueron los mexicanos que hicieron estas tierras una mierda como la India.

Texas was a rebel territory which the US had previously acknowledged belonged to Mexico, it's the same as arguing confederate states had a right to join other countries.

Fuck you OP are you roleplaying two sides here, this bait is fucking weak.

>aztec heritage
Yeah, that explains why Central and South America are even more violent lol

No, I'm not, my English isn't so bad.

>Italy
>One of the greathest empire of history, Roman empire
>France
>Quebec a powerful mand first world province of Canada

Nope

Haitians are the purest black in the West Indies because French didn't racemix with Africans, we did with Amerindian Qts tho

You beaners really are worthless.

Haiti was first world under the french empire

Estupido indio de mierda siempre haces hilos y quedas como un pendejo analfabeta ,no sabes usar computadora cavernícola simio asqueroso

France and Portugal and Spain have at least spread their language.
All we have is Afrikaans wich is cute to listen to but thats it

>we did with Amerindian Qts tho
nice literal meme

Are people still retarded enough to think it has something to do with the country?

There are only four successful European colonies
The four in which locals were genocided and replaced with whites (Canada, USA, Australia, NZ)

It has nothing to do with Britain, France, Spain....etc
The 200 or so other British colonies (Zimbabwe, Iraq, Burma, Nigeria, India, Pakistan...etc) are as shit as French ones and way worse than Spanish ones

>never truly lived beyond Maule

¿vo eri weon? ¿comprendes la distribución geografica de los pueblos mapuches? (Si, pueblos)

Los pueblos Mapuches comprenden a todos los pueblos que hablan un dialecto del mapudungun y que fueron sometidos a estos.

Los territorios mapuches empezaban en la región de coquimbo y terminaban en la isla grande de chiloe

Los del norte eran los famosos promaucae, que se mesclaron con los incas y que ayudaron a los españoles.

Los de más al sur eran los huilliches, que llegaban hasta la isla grande.

Los que pelearon contra los españoles y ofrecieron la resistencia más grande fueron los Araucanos o moluches (los tipicos que ves en los libros de historia)

>stoneage indians

El periodo se denomina "neolítico" saco de wea, los pueblos mapuches se encontraban en el periodo agro-alfarero medio y tardio.

¿siquiera pusiste atención en el liceo? esa era materia de psu hace 4 años atras.
Chile era la colonia más pobre y peligrosa de españa, se gano la denominación de "cementerio de españoles" e "indias holandesas" por lo mismo, aquí murieron más conquistadores españoles e indigenas sometidos a su dominio en conflicto contra los habitantes de esta tierra que en todas las demas colonias españolas.

Agarra un libro sobre historia y geografia.

We are the sons of criminals, spaniard tercios from andalucia & bloody mapuche warriors promaucae and Quechua (i forget pascuences)

What about Hong Kong

Based french dude.
Not even one of our colonies were populated only by us,portuguese-whites. We never had the number's to do that. And it doubt that was the objective of the portuguese ruler's

Italy as a single country is younger than almost every country in Latin America you ignorant negroid.

City-sate
They're always successful
France has Monaco

Chinese colonists OUT

Why are these chinks LARPing as Britons?

Malta

They know a good thing when they see it.

>Italy is the same as the Roman Emipere
boi you dumb as fuck

does anyone know what the greek and austrian colonies are?

That was an European country to begin with
That's like France claiming England is a French colony because French nobles ruled it for centuries

aside from quebec, every other colony you had are broke and poor. Youre basically worse then spain at least they got chile argentina panama and cuba. Hell mexico is on its way to be rich

they were too trusting unlike japan....they were smart

This is sad

Algeria seems like it's doing ok. Canada too. Also Monaco

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_colonisation_of_Nicobar_Islands

wtf, this board is actually teaching me something

part of the British empire, get over it

Haiti under french control was first world

>Los pueblos Mapuches comprenden a todos los pueblos que hablan un dialecto del mapudungun

Negro de mierda deberias aprender historia antes de propaganda. Ninguno de los pueblos al norte o en la patagonia se consideraban mapuches, de la misma manera que un indio boliviano que habla español no es español un pehuenche o un picunche no es un mapuche, la gran mayoria de los indios que hablaban mapu se unieron a españa

Eres un pobre indio mestizo que cree las mentiras de personajes como nicolas palacios. Revisionismo para crear una identidad nacional y hacer que mestizos olorosos se sientan parte de una casta guerrera. Chile no tenia riquezas y no justificaba una inversion economica española fuera de algunos puertos. Decir que todos los que hablaban mapudungun eran mapuches es un arma de los indios mapuches para negar la historia de otros indios.

Los indigenas al norte del maule no se vestian igual, no se organizaban de la misma manera, y no se alimentaban de la misma manera, los mapuches no son originarios de el sur de chile ni jamas controlaron todo el sur.
Los mapuches se han estado apropiando de la cultura e historia de otros indigenas por dos siglos, como los demas se integraron nadie quedaba para hacerlos callar, ahora sigue en lo mismo, protestando que se enseñen lenguas indigenas que no sea el mapudungun, protestanto que se usen nombres en aymara en el norte de chile.

>periodo agro-alfarero medio y tardio.

Literalmente un meme que no es tomado en serio por NADIE que no sea chileno, es un termino absolutamente ridiculo que no es ocupado por historiadores fuera de chile y en un muy menor grado argentina.
Y como dato, los andaluces fueron irrelevantes para la historia chilena. Somos una de las dos colonias con menos andaluces. De a poco la historia esta cambiando y no son pocos los historiadores que se han revelado contra el cancer que es el araucanismo.

What is France on, like their 5th republic? They couldn't get their own country settled and stable let alone others thousands of miles away. Because the UK has been relatively stable for so long, people were free to pursue lofty goals in science and engineering and export it. It's why the Industrial Revolution could only have had happened and did in the UK.

...

Haiti being largely Black has more to do with the Creoles either being killed by Blacks or leaving the island for other French possessions.

>HRE
>scary

Yeah, nah
Until the mid 19th century, Germany was that one punching bag everyone wanted his turn to hit
They were the equivalent to Iraq nowdays

could you find anything about the 1 greek colony? when i google i only find ancient greek colonies

They all shared that sacrifice religion, death is something they are used to deep in their culture