Why does this movie have such a bad rating? Is it really that bad...

Why does this movie have such a bad rating? Is it really that bad? Or are memers just giving it a bad rating just because?

>erotic fiction written by fat ugly middle aged mom
I'd rather read wincest by neckbeards on Sup Forums desu senpai.

My understanding of it is that the larger audience didn't like it because it makes the female lead into a useless beige self-insert who somehow manages to have less agency, spine, and charisma than Bella Swan of Twilight fame. Not coincidentally, girls who grew up with Twilight shit went gaga over the 50 Shades crap since it was original Twilight fanfic, but with hawt BDSM sexXxors.

My subbie GF loved the books and hated the movie. I can't be fucked to read or watch either so this is all based on what she said.

All reviewers should be executed.

Enough said

I expected kinky sex but got only one subpar scene in an hour and a half

Its mommy porn with a lot of themes the same audience of left-wing middle aged women find 'problematic' when talking in public.
Ergo everyone shittalks it but it still makes bank because they all still went to see it.

Its a badly written book and all the movie magic in the world can't save the plot so unless you can self insert it has few redeeming qualities.

It's the ultimate 18-25 year old suburban white woman fantasy. A poor "average-looking" girl accidentally gets to meet a handsome billionaire who falls in love with her, and who lets her be "naughty."
BDSM people I know say the BDSM is very tame at best, and abusive at worst.

It's basically the after-dinner woman's version of "the poor orphan is really a magic wizard who's secretly the most important person in the world"

*That should be"after-college woman's .."

>movies that men don't understand

.

It is actually really bad since, well, the source material is already garbage since it is literally and unironically Twilight fanfiction but at least it's amusingly terribly written.

The movie is just boring and depressing from the terrible casting and acting, the supposedly virginal and submissive protagonist comes across as a world weary gold digger since she doesn't like S&M at all and only sticks around for as long as she can bare it for free shit and the supposedly hyper-masculine love interest is extremely ashamed that he likes to spank women and autistically insecure about intimacy which somehow manages to make a billionaire unappealing.

Of course Americans think a movie that involves a scene where a man ties a womans hands up during sex and spanks her with a riding crop is the edgiest thing to ever happen.

Watch The Secretary for a BDSM movie done right.

He doesn't let her be naughty. When she is he either whips her or rapes her.

no means yes when you and your partner agreed to a safeword to make everything stop

no idea, I loved it, made me really wet

>and abusive at worst.

He literally rapes her, because the author doesn't know how BDSM works and thinks it's just "he does whatever he wants and she likes it". Something the BDSM community is strictly against because they know the importance of safe-words and trust when dealing with that kind of fetish.

Under-18?

Kek

>some faggot degenerates get to decide how the whole world enjoys sex

Fuck off retard.

that the first one? if so I've seen it two times.
first time I just skipped to the sex bits and was very unimpressed. thought it was some real bdsm stuff but no just boring love.
second time I watched it full and the dialogue is just hilariously bad.

1/10 and 10/10 ratings should seriously be ignored for the final score. I bet 90% of the 1/10 raters haven't even seen it.

Isn't he just explaining how the BDSM community deals with issues of consent in non-con kinkplay? In which case what he's saying is accurate.

>some faggot degenerates get to decide how the whole world enjoys sex

Fuck off retard.

>some faggot degenerates get to decide how the whole world enjoys sex

Fuck off retard.

>some faggot virgins get to decide that the whole world shouldn't enjoy sex

Fuck off retard.

...

>"We're lovers, Anastasia. Lovers don't need safewords".


That's a direct quote.

>the BDSM community
lmao
while fat theater majors are making up their safewords i just straight up spank girls with my belt or something. where's the fun in costumes and rules and shit? sex isn't a game.

tfw my dad loves the books and the movies for some reason and won't believe me that it's literally twilight fanfiction

I know this is going to blow your mind, but pretty much everyone enjoys sex in a different way so yes for some sex is a game and the game is the most satisyfying part. Also there's a big difference between a belt spanking and playing out a rape fantasy.

Sure it did, Adam
>dad
Never expected men to like it.

>spank girls with my belt or something
that's entry tier BDSM though

I think its also because its bad porn. In a world where i can get four asians fucking a latino dude in a bath tub in 4 minutes on my phone why would anyone go to see something watered down?

It's not the spanking they have a problem with. It's tying the girl up and then not stopping when she tells you to stop. The reason why they're against that is because if you do that once then the person isn't going to trust anyone enough to try being tied up again. They don't want retards to ruin their chances of tying people up.

Also the dude in 50 Shades has more in common with an abuser than an actual member of the BDSM community, which ruins their image. They obviously don't want people to think they'll act like him when they're trying to get a new girl/guy into their fetishes.

It sold well because many people enjoyed the book.
Movie was absolute garbage, it's not comparable to the book.
Hoping to see 2nd part not sell.

>50 shades of grey 2: anal

>They don't want retards to ruin their chances of tying people up.

Kek. There might be an element of enlightened self-interest there, but IME it was mostly that they were being portrayed as deviant abusive weirdos. The relationship sounded co-dependant, and not in a good way.

Sasha Grey retired too early, she could have ridden the gravy train to megabucks with parodies.

French women love this

>the older women rated it less

>It's not the spanking they have a problem with. It's tying the girl up and then not stopping when she tells you to stop. The reason why they're against that is because if you do that once then the person isn't going to trust anyone enough to try being tied up again. They don't want retards to ruin their chances of tying people up.


>poor me, I cannot find somebody trust worthy to makke me cum

anyone who rates anything 0/10 or 10/10 is someone whose opinion ought to be immediately discarded as waste
i've never evaluated any media and thought it worthy of ten out of ten digits, and i've never had any media deserve worse evaluation than three out of ten digits

>trying to impress anonymous retards by telling them how much you score

This picture is terrifying

Imdb system takes 0s and 10s into account, but weighs them less

I rate all movies I see in a year and while I mostly agree with what your saying I have no problems with my 1.5 for Why Him?and 2.5 for RE: The Final Chapter.

Like a suit. An Edgar suit.

This. 1/10 and 10/10 is something so extraordinarily good or bad, it should only come along maybe once a year. If I see someone on Letterboxd rating five stars or 0.5 all the time, you know their meanings are absolutely worthless.

I agree with you that there are movies out there that probably deserve 1/10 ratings, but I'm certainly never going to watch such a movie.
Maybe one day a real awful movie will creep up on me, but I'm pretty decent at scoping out trash so I need not suffer it.

She's so plain and has such a shit body

>people who have read and liked the book didn't like a shitty movie
Gee, what a surprise.

>implying a special word will make someone stop if they don't want to

Stop will work or it won't. Either way, a special word doesn't help. Don't let yourself get tied up if you are worried about sex turning into rape.

>I'm a dom btw

>Stop will work or it won't. Either way, a special word doesn't help.

Except in the cases like rape-roleplay, where one partner wants to be able to scream no and stop without you actually stopping. If they actually DO want you to stop there needs to be a clear word to convey this. Same with pane-play or any other type of scenario where the person might be yelling all kinds of shit without actually wanting it to stop.

How the hell can you be so vanilla that you don't understand this?

Just like how women want it. Why do you think they chose that fugly bitch over Daddario for jessica jones?

>irrelevant ramblings: the post: the motion picture

And no one believes that you have sex.

I'm not sure, I expect Hollywood to give me idealised physical standards even for self insert characters.
Do women really want to self insert as 'the ugly girl'? That's disgusting.