Should indigenous peoples that were displaced by colonialism be compensated more...

Should indigenous peoples that were displaced by colonialism be compensated more. As well as recognized as the first inhabitants of your country in your country's constitution?

They should be given a standard of living equal to what they would have had without colonialism.

They would refuse to revert to that, because they have experienced the comforts of modern western civilization for too long.

That's anglo's problem.
We never did that sort of things.

How do you know they didn't wipe out some other group of people that were there? Also, why stop there? They are just the asshole that split off and left Africa. Why don't we only compensate people in Africa as they were the original humans?

Thats fine, just tell them we cannot pay for everyone and that to decide who gets the gimmedats we will have minorities fight mortal combat style

I'm the indigenous person to my country. Feels good man

What about RĂ©union, the island off the east coast of Africa is governed by the French Constitution.

:)

Its called losing. Quit whining. If they spent more time advancing their civ than bitching they might make something out of thereselves.

No. The white man is supreme. The nigger is defective. The nigger needs colonialism.

No. Before colonialism there were still warring states and tribes and untold numbers of them conquering themselves. Just in this case the conquerors came from another continent. If you were to 'compensate' for conquering x number of tribes then those people should also now compensate other tribes/people they conquered and you'd never really get anywhere.

At this point they should just realize that their state lost and simply integrate. No one in fucking brittany is going to complain for compensation from France.

They never had to advance their civilization, because they never needed to think ahead and store food for the winter. Which is how Europeans learned and became better at civilization.

>Gave them 96% of the country less than 50 years ago

>somehow you dumbfucks think we need to compensate them more

...give me the Fifth Empire please

>Its called losing.

They got 5,000 years worth of tech for free. That's not losing.

Yes. Sweden and Fennoswedes should pay for the centuries of colonialism they inflicted on the Finnish people.

#TheCaseForReparations

> mfw Brits just left the last union of white countries and will merge with a bunch of nigger-infested shitholes as the right-wing autists are placated with "it's for colonialism" shyte

>mfw Brits just left the last union of white countries

Wrong. We left the EU. We're still in the Commonwealth.

Can you understand this or do I need to translate it to Turkish?

No.

> Commonwealth
Enjoy 2 billion "people" who cannot poo in loo

No, they should be exterminated as the last remaining vestiges of a dead end branch in sub-human history that they are.

The bottom line is the kudjins here lived harmoniously for 300 thousand years. Knew inbreeding was bad. Burnt off forests for regrowth. Etc.. etc.. they were better than us whites. Us whites were a spreading cancer. Much like the muslims are today.

Enjoy 70 million Turks.
Enjoy your refugees.
Enjoy ficke ficke.

Personally, I'll take trade with India over mass immigration by "Syrian refugees" any day of the week.

The Caucasus are in Europe now? When did that happen?

only if whites are allowed a homeland

If they do, it's no problem getting your money back. Just short accident insurance providers and buy petrol stock.

>the kudjins here lived harmoniously for 300 thousand years

They killed 95% of native fauna, including all megafauna.
They destroyed 90% of the continent's rain forest.
They routinely practised cannibalism, including eating firstborn infants.
By the time of European contact, their greatest technical achievement was a stick.
Today, a majority of abo children are sexually abused by their parents.
And you want me to be impressed because 100,000 years ago they worked out that fucking their sisters was bad?

Literally the exact opposite of what happened.

La RĂ©union was unhinabited.

>DEY WER AT 1 WITH DURR ENVIRONMENT DURR

i hope you die

However barbaric, they were still harmonious. That whole mega fauna shit im ganna need a source on.

you utterly stupid faggot cunt

Delete this

I for one want to embrace the aboriginal culture and dance with the elders under the stars outside parliament house. Breh

They deserve nothing.

Colonel Nelson Miles said it best.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1y_0NfhF9c

>Should indigenous peoples that were displaced by colonialism be compensated more.

They are already compensated well enough. Aboriginal villages exist in rural areas where everyone takes money from the Government and the whole community lives off welfare. They are on par with developing countries. The inhabitants take care of nothing, they let it all break and then ask the Government to fix it.

Additionally, there are plenty of Aboriginal land trusts that get royalties from mining under the guise of "redirecting funds to the community", but I'll give you 3 guesses to figure out how effective that system is and how much money the average Aboriginal the trust purports to represent actually sees of that money.

>As well as recognized as the first inhabitants of your country in your country's constitution?

I legitimately don't have a problem with the constitutions saying that Aboriginals were here first, If that's all it was. But absolutely everyone knows that's not all It would be, and that there would be associated implications and more cases in the vein of Mabo in the High Court over 'muh land' If the Government ever acknowledged that they existed.

they were introduced by the work of our LORD's hand to the salvation of Jesus Christ. There is no better compensation than this.

But they don't believe in our Christian God, they believe in the Rainbow Serpent God and the Cod Fish God.

oh, they are gonna believe.

Wow that's gripping. What's this from?

>abos
>people
Pick one

The "aboriginal" people europeans encountered were definately NOT the first inhabitants or culture of the continent. The continent has a history of invasion and colonisation going back to its earliest inhabitation.

The earliest remains are phenotypically very different to modern "aboriginals". There are also remains of many varied populatins, such as very short and very gracile peoples, who were later replaced.

There were at least 3 waves of settlement. the most recent we know of is a large influx of southern asian genes about 4000years ago , at the time of the inteoduction of the dingo.

The pama nyungan lanuages correlate very closely with backed stone tools, and suggest that 7/8 of australia was far more linguistically diverse, until it was colonised recently by pama-nyungan speakers. Non pama nyungan languages are only found in the far morth of wa and nt, and correlate with bifacial stone tools. "Noongars" are therefore relatively recent invaders of southern populations, and do not have an "ancestral spiritual" connection to land.

Incidentally, the pama nyungan backed tools are similar to backed tools found in sulawesi, Indonesia, dting to several thousand years ago. While much later in time, this also haooens to be the area fishermen historically came from to catch trepang and trade with aboriginals in nirthern austrralia.

See peter bellwood's "first migrants: ancient migration in global oerspective" for a recent, rigorously referenced book that us academic but readable for the non specialist.

All known human groups invaded, murdered,conquered and colonised. To suggest "aboriginals" didnt is just a variation of the "noble savage" myth. Europeans just happened to be better at it through a series of circumstances requiring adaption.

All nations are founded through conquest, and all peoples engaged in conquest, therefore "aboriginals" have no greater claim to territory that they conquered, just because they invaded at a somewhat earlier point in time.

They're primitive, but they're still people. But I sense that you are dehumanizing them for racist reasons.

Bury my heart at wounded knee.

Yeah, fine with me, give them back their sticks, if you find one of those people alive...

Why was Russia the only country that successfully colonized savages?

Russia still owns all of Siberia and made the locals believe that they're Russian as well

Found a full copy on google books, free, I'll bookmark it for bedtime reading.

ever been to Japan or S Korea?

dats gross senpai

fuck off, canada.

Fuck yaweh.

Not an argument shit skin

Russia inherited its colonies from the Mongolian Empire, of which it was a key subject/vassal province

Its a good read, talkes about genetic, lingustic and archaeological evidence for early human migrations.

I disagree with some of the guys theories,and he has a habit of promoting whatever side if a contested theory he likes as accepted by all specialists in a field.

But overall it is a very well refernced, well argued and readable piece of scholarship that covers a topic with very little coverage.

"Massive migration from the steppe may be a source of european languages" , (waal et al2015 ), is a recent article that continues many of the themes,and uses genetic analysis of 20k year old ice mummies to conclude that an ancient non-mongoloid siberian populatin was ancestral to both europeans and native americans.

Only if they accept permanent banishment to reservations where no first world comforts are present.

I read The 10,000 Year Explosion, that detailed well adaptation and evolution into civilization.

I liked the part, as to the reasoning why Inuits didn't evolve white skin like Caucasians due to the lower UV. The reason being that Inuits consumed enough Vitamin D in their sea-based diet, that their body didn't evolve to require less melanin for more UV absorption.

I find reading a good non-fiction book while stoned - the knowledge from it, sticks with me for a lifetime. If I read a shitpost on Sup Forums however, I'll forget about it.

Thanks! Will do. I wish I had time to get stoned and read still, now I have to just blow my mind with ideas alone. (3 months strait now and its actually nice to have a change.... Smoking weed every day can actually get kinda boring i found desu senpai)

Another good one is "The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World".

Like Haak 2015, it is about the Yamna culture and how it spread proto indoeuropean languages west and east, about 4000bc, via new horseriding and vehicle technologies.

Yamna culture were the last of the 3 main waves of migration into europe. They were preceded by a wave of neolithic farmers from the near east around 7000bc, and hunter-gatherers that it appeaars had been hiding out in "refuges" since before the last glacial period at 18ya.

Marija Gimbutas wrote a book called "the civilization of the goddess" that presents well all the archaeological evidence for this, (which is being confirmed by recent genetic analysis of ice mummies). She then goes on to provides her own interpretation of a peacful neolithic farmer matriarchy being invded by paternalistic pastoralists ;)

Yep, those same white people, also formed the first civilization of Sumeria. The Aryans, and the Indus Valley natives called them, which civilized them. The Vedas were written by whites, and made the Indians perfectly replicate it, word-for-word, for several millennia.

>"...and they, the white people, with golden hair, and sea-coloured eyes, came to us on chariots from the North and educated us"