Film focused on a female audience

>film focused on a female audience
>7%

really tickles your synapses

>women writers

>these are the same critics who give capeshit like civil war and avengers 9/10's
really gets the neurons firing

maybe it's because it's a bad movie based on literal fan fiction...

showed it at the theater i work at already, mostly 15 year old girls in the audience desu, thought there would be more old hags

the first film, and the books, are objectively terrible.

but it's basically porn for women who think they're too good to watch porn, it'll still make a fuckload of money.

>feminists say men are scum
>women are into rape, abuse and getting stalked

?????

it's like when most homophobes are actually fags themselves

>he still hasn't learned that a woman will allow a wealthy and attractive man do anything he wants
Just don't be ugly. Works for me

>thinks 50 Shades of Gray is feminist literature

Went to see John wick last night. The women that were shuffling in to see Grey were among the ugliest people I have seen. One girl was probably 200lbs wearing yoga pants with slits cut in the. Exposing her legs.

So what man can we blame for this?

How many sequels before it's just called one shade of blacked?

I'm curious to see how this plays out as well

Basically the women that go to see this movie are brainwashed by the patriarchy, who are also the ones that profit from it

you say 50shades is a masterpiece, like BvS is?

I bet that poor actress was threatened to do the film by a fat neckbeard virgin, but the handsome guy tried to save her. It was too late, and the movie was made anyways. The handsome guy was also threatened at some point. Sad story.

It's like how if a black man wants to be educated, employed, but insurance, or pay into a 401k, he's acting "white"

>feminists say men are scum
No, just ugly men
>women are into rape, abuse and getting stalked
Yes, by handsome men

>handsome, rich**, men
ftfy

Well that is how white people act

I obviously agree that it's nothing bad though

Not really. If you're a good looking guy you're playing on easy mode when it comes to women, rich or not

beauty matters less for women, perceived status and wealth count way more

That's the thing though, I went to the first one, lots of boobs, lots of vagina, but no penis. I think once you see the lower third of his penis but the vats majority of the nudity is geared towards men.

Aren't all women sort of a little bit lesbians too though?

This

>rich popular guy
>hot guy

Who do you choose to date and who to have on the side? There is only one solution to this puzzle

Yes RT is shit but you could easily have named some real disasters with high scores like Ghostbusters.

trump for being a sex symbol

>The way the women are portrayed is very old-fashioned, the dialogue is wooden and the actors' talent is severely limited.
>The amorous to and fro between penthouse and helicopter, between bedroom and masked ball is as shallow as a puddle and as schmaltzy as a cheap romance novel.
>And the movie's eroticism is limited to a handful of nude scenes that have the sex appeal of a tv advert for a stairlift.
>Enough reasons to save the money you'd spend on a ticket.

>if they like it in movies, they like it in real life

>hos too stupid to pirate BDSM porn and read shitty twilight fanfiction online for free
tip top lel

>and as schmaltzy as a cheap romance novel.

it's just like the book then