Sup Forums seems to hate the "elite" but still likes capitalism.
Protip: you can't have one without the other. Capitalism will always ensure that a global elite will form that will collude together wrecking nations both rich and poor just to earn another buck.
Even your beloved Trump participates in this by outsourcing all of the jobs for his suits and clothing to China and Bangladesh. This is literally a requirement for capitalism to sustain itself.
Explain your selves.
Other urls found in this thread:
xvideos.com
twitter.com
With you senpai. Communism would have won if the USSR survived into the digital era. Would have been so much easier to balance supply/demand, and they'd be immune to the automation related structural problems faced by capitalism today.
Tell me this is from a porno!?
Sauce
This is why there's something called national socialism.
we dont live in capitalism we live in a technocracy. the elite print as much money as they like. we were born into the dave and busters and cant get out and they own the dave and busters
Yeah man worked great for the germans until the rest of the world ruined it for them.
Only half joking
Real capitalism hasn't been tried.
also would like to know this
>another "explain yourself" John Oliver thread
Get back to making your shit shows m8.
No you're wrong. Capitalism can work but the biggest problem in the Us is the limitation of democracy. Our political system has been tranished by a fugazi two-party system where the parties only seek to serve themselves and their financial associates
>your selves
do you expect anybody to take you seriously?
Capitalism isn't about forming different classes based on income, it's about having the opportunity to thrive economically based on your will.
You can't do this on the other side of the story ( communism, etc) because you are limited by the government.
It is only obvious that some smarter people will dominate the stupid majority economically.
sauce on picture please
Just slightly bigger tits and they would have the perfect figure for fucking.
Sauce on thick latina booty qts.
I want to lick their assholes
This. Socialism isn't necessarily a bad thing if it's not combined with open borders.
Google images has no result. Definitely not from a porno.
Protip:
You're a moron if you think socialism isn't worse in creating "elites".
Capitalism is all about big government. Humans evolved in a tribal society that discouraged conspicuous consumption. If one member got too powerful, the weaker members would gang up and bring him down. This helped preserve societal harmony. Capitalism demands that we give up our freedom to exert collective demands in favor of "property rights". Doesn't sound very natural or free to me senpai.
in other words, it only works in a homogeneous society.
search Culioneros, ner name is natasha, on phone can't provide link.
>Implying USSR is not faking death.
Actually we arent a capitalism system at all but a mix set of economical theory. Just like how we are a republic goverment and not a democratic one
dem bootays mmhhmm..what, you were saying something OP?
Theortically capitalism, communism and any other type of system can work in a control enviroment. Humans are the unpredictability variable that can make or break a system
carol seleme christiane kroll
There's a difference between. Capitalism and Crony-Capitalism.
Capitalism doesn't involve:
- QE (quantitative easing aka printing money)
- a central bank price-fixing interest rates
- manipulating assets.
- federal regulations of everything imaginable.
- onerous taxation on investment.
- corporate bailouts.
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States.
Is not xvideos.com
>muh founding fathers
Don't give a fuck Senpai, I'm not into 18th century logic
oh yeah, that's why communist china and the USSR were awesome, being monogamous and all.
USSR was actually more diverse than the us is now. Read a book dunce.
and virtually 100% white, just as china was virtually 100% east asian.
homogeneity doesn't make socialism work
dunce.