What do you think of this film? Is it realistic? Is it artistic? Social commentary?

What do you think of this film? Is it realistic? Is it artistic? Social commentary?

It's pedo shit

They were all 18.

>realistic
No

>artistic
Yes

>social commentary
No

It was a vehicle for Larry Clark to once again get off on exploiting young, impressionable actors and actresses utilizing an AIDS plot line to give it the appearance of being "important."

Porn. I masturbated to it.

It's certainly depressing.
I like it.

>DUDE AIDS LMAO

title?

I wish they made another one but with the teens of "now".

whats the fucking title you plebs

What? How is it not realistic?

See the filename you fucking retard

What do you think of this film?
I hate it, because it makes me uncomfortable

Is it realistic?
I don't know, probably a bit exaggerated

Is it artistic?
Most movies are to some degree

Social commentary?
Yes, obviously

>harmony korine flicks

>dat barely hidden vagoo

this is my fetish

90% of kids in the 90s didnt catch AIDs

You can't get HIV through vaginal sex. The odds are literally 1 in 40,000

Why do you post like a retard?

How come their aren't movies about young people who aren't sexed up maniacs, or virgins who are desperate to become sexed up maniacs?

>can't get
>odds are higher than 0

ok bud lol sure thing there bud haha

getting sex isn't that easy

it usually only that high because of sex workers, if you fuck the average college slut, its 1 in a billion chance

...

because contemporary society does not value modesty and/or chastity

yes yes and maybe
dunno how much is it 'social commentary' as it doesn't really say anything, just observes

this

It's exploitation pretending to have depth and subtle meaning, along with most things Larry Clark and Harmony Korine have made.

It's not realistic. As much as horny old men might like to fantasize, teens aren't half as depraved as this movie depicts.

Is it artistic? That gets into defining what exactly "art" is, which is too deep a question to answer on Sup Forums. It's certainly not good.

I'm sure the filmmakers tried to jam some hamfisted "social commentary" in there to justify the perversion, but it's handled so terribly it gets lost in the awful narrative.

>>odds are higher than 0

Those are the odds of you getting HIV by having heterosexual penis in the vagina sex with HIV+ women. It really really hard for a woman to give HIV to a man.

...

>As a child, Korine changed his name from "Harmony" and went by "Harmful," as he thought it made him sound tougher when he got in fights.

try Ken Park

>it's a white suburban virgins say a movie is inaccurate because it doesn't reflect their particularly sheltered pathetic lives episode

did he poz her neg ass?

it's just bad exploitation movie shit

zero artistic value!

...

>he actually believes that two objectively ugly skinny dudes could just get pussy on demand like that

feel sorry for you

gross

>>mfw asking genY about things they can never know

kek

>teens aren't half as depraved as this movie depicts
Well I don't think the movie ever tried to say every teen is like that, just followed this particular group of youth and their exploits

i wanna jerk off but she looks exactly like my brothers girlfriend

fuck it i'm gonna do it i better not get that post-orgasm regret

hello my fine african friend. did you raep a virgin to cure your disease yet?

>>hes never lived in a metropolis

hello nowhereman.
how is life in notimportanttown?

ken park is what created my mom fetish

>As much as horny old men might like to fantasize, teens aren't half as depraved as this movie depicts

Yes, some of them are.