Is he /ourguy/?

is he /ourguy/?

Other urls found in this thread:

rocketlawyer.com/article/civil-union-vs-marriage-whats-the-difference-cb.rl
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>or you're against "activist" reading of the constitution
>or you're for the states rights
>or you're against marriage as a state-sanctioned institution
>or you're against marriage
>or you're against diluting gay culture with traditions designed for the purposes of straight people

He's right. Only busy-bodies care what other people do.

Republicans decided states rights don't exist back in 1861.

>>or you're against diluting gay culture with traditions designed for the purposes of straight people
this, marriage completely lost its original meaning, it shouldnt even be called that anymore

Why is Joe Rogan so painfully unfunny?
I think hes interesting to listen to but hes not funny at all. Yet he constantly talks about his standup as if anyone gives a shit about it.

or you like dick
you
like
dick

insecurity. he cant handle knowing he's a mediocre standup and refuses to acknowledge he's the "fearfactor/MMA/goofy weed guy with the podcast"

>By the power vested in me by the District of Columbia, I now pronounce you husband and husband. You may now kiss the faggot.

...

if marriage is a religious institution, and being gay is anti religion, why not just allow civil union, and let a church decide if it wants to be blasphemous?

>or you're against marriage as a state-sanctioned institution

The only good reason listed, everything else is just trying to force your lifestyle and values on people

recommend me Joe Rogan stand up

>what are positions designed to muddy the water and confuse while we keep everything the same as it was to our benefit

>if marriage is a religious institution
It's not.

You can be wed by a judge.

You get government benefits for being married. Not allowing gay people to get married is blatant discrimination.

You get the same benefits for civil unions too.

thats a civil union. you can call the union a marriage, you can call it whatever the fuck you want. but an actual wedding/marriage is done in a church or other religious institution.

dont argue semantics when you are clearly wrong.

Rocky mountain high

pretty funny listening to him try talk comedy with a guy like bill burr who fucking kills it

The argument should be that the benefits shouldn't exist then, not that gay marriage should.

>You get the same benefits for civil unions too.

rocketlawyer.com/article/civil-union-vs-marriage-whats-the-difference-cb.rl

You're the one arguing semantics.

The government makes no distinction between a marriage performed by a judge and one done by a priest.

Marriage is a public institution and has been for a very long time. There are tax benefits conferred. It affects legal status and a variety of other things.

>"Dismantling the bedrock of Western Civilization" isn't a good reason
lol

Rogan is a plant. And a dim one at that.

A civil union is a legal status that provides many of the same protections as marriage does to couples. However, these protections are only available at the state level. Federal protections, such as tax breaks and social security benefits, are unavailable to the civilly united.

jej

>anyone who hates fags is secretly a fag himself :^)))

Are we still going with this bullshit narrative and basing our views of reality off of American Beauty?

They get the same benefits in my country. Maybe Americans just need to alter the laws regarding civil unions instead of destroying a religious institution.

>Fags don't have gay-marriage recognized by the State.
>"Oppression"

>Mormons and Muslims don't have polygamist-marriage recognized by the State.
>"Not oppression."

I agree that they shouldn't, but they do. So either legalize gay marriage or get rid of the benefits.

>There are only two reasons to hate fascism, either you're dumb, or you're secretly worried that Hitler was right

Or just give them the same benefits as an actual marriage?

Not the same thing but whatever. Trying to explain this to you would be like trying to explain physics to a goldfish.

>being gay is anti religion

You what

Being gay is "anti religion"? What the fuck does that even mean? If you're gay, you hate all religions? All religions have the same rules and hate gays? You can't be gay and religious?

Marriage isn't strictly a Christian, Jewish, or Muslim union. It's not monopolized by religion either. Marriage has social and legal aspects. "They can just get a civil union" is an abhorrent counter argument to the argument that gays deserve the same right to marriage as everyone else.

"Gays should have equal rights, one of which is the right to marriage"

"Gays can just get a civil union instead!"

You see the part where you're an idiot? The part where a civil union isn't literally equal to being a marriage, therefore it's denying gays equal rights.

Gay marriage isn't legal in Israel.

Neither is an arab marrying a jew.

faggot detected

The thread ended here, kids.

A simple reply from a simple mind.

All unions between consenting adults should be legalized.

If special benefits are involved only two members of a polygamous group can use them to avoid gaming benefits systems.

Based heebs.

Sometimes not everything is perfect

fpbp, as always

>Gay marriage isn't legal in Israel.
>Neither is an arab marrying a jew.
why does thee media never discuss the exclusion and intolerance?


jk, we all know

Bitch Mormons had to deal with not only legitimate oppression because if polygamy from general society but the US fucking government basically threatening their existence unless they changed their core dogma to remove polygamy.

Now Mormons are heretics but they suffered far worse than faggots and frankly deserve to have polygamy if fags get gay marriage.

>that reddit formatting of his post

What the fuck do you even mean?

Ah yes, 1800's "Republicans." Those socially progressive rascals pushing for big government. Why do you all screech about how "party's not the same!" when we're talking about slavery, but when it's the overstep of Federal authority, Republicans are Republicans?