Casual reminder that "Cultural Marxism" is a right wing conspiracy theory and holds no scientific validity like the...

Casual reminder that "Cultural Marxism" is a right wing conspiracy theory and holds no scientific validity like the well known fact of the dominance and oppression of the Patriarchy.

Just look at wikipedia if you don't believe me.

Other urls found in this thread:

nypost.com/2016/07/01/elite-k-8-school-teaches-white-students-theyre-born-racist/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankfurt_School#Cultural_Marxism_conspiracy_theory
youtube.com/watch?v=Cg3T_H2LZ54
marcuse.org/herbert/pubs/60spubs/65repressivetolerance.htm
jstor.org/stable/2739576?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1893020
culturalpolitics.net/cultural_theory/postmodern
twitter.com/AnonBabble

nypost.com/2016/07/01/elite-k-8-school-teaches-white-students-theyre-born-racist/

And? Do you have a point? Racism needs to be addressed and it's obvious that white people are naturally racist and can't handle things that are different from themselves.

t. Antonio Gramsci

Cultural Marxism doesn't exist.

The idea that an atonal music guru (Theodor Adorno) and a Jewish mystic-turned-Marxist (Walter Benjamin) destroyed the West by critiquing art is laughable and absurd.

Everything Sup Forums blames on the Frankfurt School is the product of late capitalism and POSTMODERNISM.

Cultural Marxism aims to spread post modernism you twit.

>it's obvious that white people are naturally racist and can't handle things that are different from themselves.
Why is that obvious?

did someone say they wanted a national socialist thread?

...

...

>ruining your bait thread in the 2nd post

>"Cultural Marxism" is a right wing conspiracy theory and holds no scientific validity

Sure thing, komrade.

...

...

>2 posts by this ID

>Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory

>"Cultural Marxism" as a term originated prior to the 1980s as an informal and uncommon way of describing certain Western Marxists as they transitioned away from utilizing structural Marxism as an element of their discourse and towards the more general practice of cultural analysis.[51][52] Since the 1990s the term has been hijacked as part of an ongoing culture war and has come to refer to a conspiracy theory which regards the Frankfurt School as the origin of a contemporary movement in the political left to take over and destroy Western society.[53][54][55] This conspiracy theory advocates the idea that The Frankfurt School had a unanimous set of beliefs and were deliberately attempting to engineer the collapse of the West using multiculturalism and political correctness as their methods.[54][55][56] The theory is associated with American religious paleoconservatives such as William S. Lind, Pat Buchanan and Paul Weyrich.[56][57][58]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankfurt_School#Cultural_Marxism_conspiracy_theory

Educate yourself.

Stormfront please go

I dunno, maybe all of human history?

>and holds no scientific validity like the well known fact of the dominance and oppression of the Patriarchy.

Reminder that the greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he doesnt exist

Its based almost all on the writings of Herbert Marcuse and Theodore Adorno and the recent SJW movement is a direct result of their teachings

youtube.com/watch?v=Cg3T_H2LZ54

...

>racism is bad
love that meme

intersectional feminism is marxism you cunt

>education through wikipedia
Sounds about right. Oh by the way, gas yourself.

liberalism infiltrated the communist left.

>Casual reminder that "Cultural Marxism" is a right wing conspiracy theory and holds no scientific validity like the well known fact of the dominance and oppression of the Patriarchy.


How do you explain the influence of Herbert Marcuse and his peers on causing the New Left in America and the cultural shift that is motivated by it?

Honestly, Cultural Marxism is a good name for it. You just don't like it because you're either ignorant of the situation or don't like having terms not defined by that group.

Post-modernism doesn't "spread", it's a material historical condition, or rather a way to describe the things that are happening.

>whites aren't naturally racist!!!
>oh well it's not like being racist is a bad thing!

I love hypocrisy.

Isn't this "cultural marxism" thing just multiculturalism?
That idea is older than either communism or fascism.

Marxism is an inherent part of america. Just read the constitution. "All men are created equal" total jewish bullshit.

>How do you explain the influence of Herbert Marcuse and his peers on causing the New Left in America

Leftists like to read obscure texts and pretend they are wiser than everyone.

>Honestly, Cultural Marxism is a good name for it.

thats their entire argument for it not existing btw. "we call it something different!"

>The whole post-fascist period is one of clear and present danger. Consequently, true pacification requires the withdrawal of tolerance before the deed, at the stage of communication in word, print, and picture. Such extreme suspension of the right of free speech and free assembly is indeed justified only if the whole of society is in extreme danger. I maintain that our society is in such an emergency situation, and that it has become the normal state of affairs. Different opinions and 'philosophies' can no longer compete peacefully for adherence and persuasion on rational grounds: the 'marketplace of ideas' is organized and delimited by those who determine the national and the individual interest. In this society, for which the ideologists have proclaimed the 'end of ideology', the false consciousness has become the general consciousness--from the government down to its last objects. The small and powerless minorities which struggle against the false consciousness and its beneficiaries must be helped: their continued existence is more important than the preservation of abused rights and liberties which grant constitutional powers to those who oppress these minorities. It should be evident by now that the exercise of civil rights by those who don't have them presupposes the withdrawal of civil rights from those who prevent their exercise, and that liberation of the Damned of the Earth presupposes suppression not only of their old but also of their new masters.

TL;DR-anyone that doesnt agree with me is literally hitler, so its okay to deprive them of their rights, especially freedom of speech

marcuse.org/herbert/pubs/60spubs/65repressivetolerance.htm

This was just the hip idea in those Enlightenment circles, Natural Rights and everything. It's not the worst thing.

when did i say whites aren't naturally racist? and if they were you wouldn't be posting commie drivel on 4chinz :^)
>m-muh slavery

it's cultural marxism. America was, and always will be, a marxist country unless we get trump in office so he can put the libtarded constitution through the shredder and write a new one.

Ironically, if we go by his definitions ("the false consciousness has become the general consciousness--from the government down to its last objects"), we should purge the Antifa.

see
and cry yourself to sleep stormweenie

>complains about not being scientific
>in the same thread complains about races and racism being facual

There are no races. We have genetics, and are mapping genomes, read a scientific journal rather than watch BBC for academic news.
"Race" implies discontinuous subsets, but human variation is continuous. There is no one trait you can use as a division between "races", because there are people with intermediate characteristics for any trait you care to look at - including the most obviously visible ones like skin color and bone structure.
And, importantly, there's more genetic variation within "races" than between them. It is possible to make a very reliable prediction of what continent someone's ancestors came from if you look at thousands of loci on their genome simultaneously, and in some cases you can get a pretty decent estimate with 100 loci. But if you look at just one or even ten places on the genome, it's impossible to be certain which population they came from. In some cases, you can't make a very reliable prediction even if you look at several hundred loci at once.
This is in large part because there's very little genetic variation within humans compared to other species. Chimps have much more genetic diversity than we do.

jstor.org/stable/2739576?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1893020

What you see as racism is people of higher culture hating people of lower culture.
A secular engineer hating a hood thug. This is not related to "race", as there is no race. Its related to culture.

>Leftists like to read obscure texts and pretend they are wiser than everyone.

well thats the weird thing. Not only does the average SJW not realize their entire belief system is rooted in cultural marxism, they get angry at you for pointing it out and deny its existence

>racism is a naturally white thing
>patriarchy is a scientific fact
Top lel, lad.

Basically "cultural marxism" is a codeword for something that does exist (all these leftist texts). They just don't self-identify this way, they'll try to pass themselves on as "Democrats" or "Social Democrats" or "Democratic socialists".

>Just look at wikipedia if you don't believe me.

>just look at wikipedia goy, we made it just for you.

So what is wrong about the thing you're linking to me?

>the Frankfurt School wasn't entirely unanimous in their beliefs
>they aren't deliberately trying to destroy the west
>but it is a name for a shift in Marxist discourse towards cultural analysis

And if you read them, they're all arguing cultural methods towards leading to revolution. Thus there is a group trying to make change and push values on the west and it has existed for decades. And not some Illuminati. This Marxist group focuses on cultural analysis. Thus Cultural Marxism is a fine name for it.


Congratulations. You played yourself.

Those are both objectively true.

Ah yes, I forgot that wikipedia, something that can be edited by anyone and anyone can join in the debate of an article is all controlled by the evil cultural marxists that run everything!

Reality has a liberal bias. Get over it and realize you're on the wrong side of history.

Cultural Marxism is a plague on Wester civilization. To say that all white people are naturally born racist because of the actions of their kin is like a racist saying that all black people are naturally violent because of their history. It's a very very bad logical fallacy which is why we constantly make fun of the left.
Also, greetings from Colorado and happy fourth everyone!

Sage this fucking slide thread.

>educate yourself
>Wikipedia
>not biased
>blatant shilling

Jesus tap dancing christ just hide and don't reply to this shit

I don't know either. You should explain.

To sum up, your whole defense is "they aren't comic villains!"
Well no shit. They don't plan to "destroy the west", they meant to destroy capitalism and cause Marxist revolution.

>Those are both objectively true.
Prove it.

>reality has a liberal bias
biology says otherwise

>Reality has a liberal bias. Get over it and realize you're on the wrong side of history.

Honestly, what do you mean by that? How can reality have a liberal bias?

I hope you're enjoying your giggle, happy 4th of July.

They ended up supporting capitalism and destroying the West, though. 0/10

It's a playful way of liberals to say they are correct.

>And if you read them, they're all arguing cultural methods towards leading to revolution.


This. Marxism is essentially a religion that fancies itself a science. They believed that the whole world would rise up as one against the capitalist, and saw WW1 as this catalyst. But that didnt happen at all. Just in Russia.

So they then thought people were too brainwashed by the fruits of capitalism to ever rise up, and planned to simply pull out the roots by dissecting every aspect of society. Like demolishing a building before you build a new one.

>They ended up supporting capitalism and destroying the West, though. 0/10

But they didn't. At best, these thinkers thought that change should happen in stages.

Do you believe Marxist feminism exists? You can look it up and there are plenty of people who identify as that. Do you believe in critical race theory? It's similarly influenced by Marxism. Why do gay pride parade always have communist marching for "queer socialism"? Liberation theology? Why is it that Zizek, the most popular Marxist intellectual spends all his time talking about movies and psychoanalysis? All these things operate in the same way. Just because they themselves don't use the term " cultural Marxism" doesn't make it invalid. We could call it "critical theory" instead but that term itself is much less descriptive.

Marxism was destroyed in academia in the late 1960s by Post Structuralism.

The Frankfurters were modernist critical theorists, they wee dead and buried by 1970, along with all Marxists.

>cultural marxism is a meme!
>but the omnipresent all-powerful patriarchy keeping the women, the blacks and they gays down is real
k e k

Yeah well unfortunately their concept didn't die with them because you still have edge lords like OP today.

>cultural marxism at work
kek

How come did you let thiS threAd GEtthis many replies?

cultural marxism is real
the frankfurt school is real
i studied about them in uni

op just wants to feel special for '''''''''''trolling''''''''''''
his friends on pol, let him have his fun

>Just look at wikipedia if you don't believe me.
Does no one ITT remember Sup Forums's coverage of leftist wiki editors literally conspiring and succeeding in changing the cultural marxism wiki entry a while back?

I'm smelling summergoyim

Refute it. You literally can't.

I'd say they evolved past mere marxism and supported globalist corporatism instead, which isn't what free market capitalism is. The aims are the same, though - an oligarchy.

Name a country run by a black person that hasn't gone to shit.

>their concept

The "Cultural Marxism" that you're referring to is actually called "Counter Hegemony". It is countering the dominant cultural structure that is in place today, and dominates societies, globally.

That social structure can be called "Cultural Capitalism". It currently dominates the entire World.

>didn't finish his course...

1 more year left

This. They believe in some Global "social-democracy". They are basically sell-outs who rationalize it by saying they promote "human rights" and "feminism", while they make the bankers richer.

>Cultural Marxism a conspiracy theory

I sincerely hope no leftists believe this. What exactly do they think happened in Stalinist Russia?

''not muh reeel commienism''

hehe

You will learn about Post Structuralism in the final year. All Modernism was crushed by the Post Structuralists.

>white people are naturally racist

which is racist to say.

How fucking old are you? Did you come here because of CNN? If you did then good. Stick around. Sup Forums will raise you the right way.

Do you think the USSR was created by "Cultural Marxism"?

heh

Are you attempting to prove genetics wrong with this """argument"""?

So basically just a bunch of edgy teenagers and idiots who don't know the basics of economics want to see a change in the (working) foundation because they're fucking hipsters.
Pretty much sums it up.

>So basically just a bunch of edgy teenagers and idiots who don't know the basics of economics

Economics?

You must be new here.

He posted this because of the CNN article and the brainwashed people who will come to this site. It's obvious b8.

>The "Cultural Marxism" that you're referring to is actually called "Counter Hegemony".

literally "muh super special brand of cultural marxism"

im not studying philosophy, but law
and philosophy of law is the subject that I studied about these
by post structuralists you mean postmodernists? or something else?

>brand of Marxism

The concept of "hegemony" comes from Antonio Gramsci.

I sugget you read his prison diaries.

Postmodernism and Frankfurt School were like day and night. The closest thing you'll get as far as an overlap goes are early writings by Benjamin on language (which were written years before he became a Marxist).

Postmodernism mostly comes from the philosophy of Heidegger, someone who Adorno viciously critiqued.

>Gramsci
>not a marxist

wew lad

To be fair, Erich Fromm lived until 1984 although he was mostly irrelevant by then.

...

All people are naturally racist.

Racism and Xenophobia are innate to all people. They fear what is different. If you can't understand that, go back to pre-school, because that is where there are naps and safe spaces.

>kabbalah
>is a book
Please.

it's good that OP brought that up: There was an excellent article on Cultural Marxism on wikipedia, which has now been cucked into oblivion, just a casual mention in the article on the (((Frankfurt School))) under the heading of a conspiracy theory.

The loss of the Cultural Marxism article is a big loss for us. We need to find a way to get it back. However, Jewish hasbarats are literally paid to monitor mention of it, and edit it out.

And how things work socially yes.
Culture has a big impact on the way economics work.

There is a distinction,

culturalpolitics.net/cultural_theory/postmodern

Can you give me an example or not?

The overwhelming majority of black people are low iq. Yes I'd argue that culture plays a factor in the development of Iq but if you and your tribe spends tens of thousands of years in warrior centric societies where athleticism is valued beyond intelligence, IQ is not going to rise in those populations. Papa New Guinnea is another example of an uncivilized race and culture.

Just making a point. Race is still a factor as ethnicity is race and culture. Just because our close relatives have more genetic variation between them doesn't make this fact any less true. That said not all judgements placed on a person should be placed on race, instead it should be ethnicity as a whole.

> no scientific validity
I don't think you know how politics works.

>Science and actual research is wrong!

Spoken like a true reich winger.

>I literally don't know that racism is only something that white people can do

Prejudice + power = Racism you retard. PoC do not have power and thus by its very definition CANNOT be racist.

The strawman cometh...

Nope. I hope the Bolsheviks are having fun being tortured in hell.

James Watson says hello

>race is still a factor

There is no such thing. It doesn't exist. Proven by genetics.
Your "no good black leader" post doesn't disprove what I wrote. You are stating a random fact that has nothing to do with the issue, and act as if you won the argument?