How to fix the libertarian problem?

How do we fix these subhumans?

>hurr hurr free market is god
>borders and nations are a barrier to the free market
>race is collectivism

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=XLgYAHHkPFs
ontheissues.org/2012/Gary_Johnson_Immigration.htm
youtube.com/watch?v=Tb8cErokGFs
reason.com/blog/2011/07/20/being-libertarian-may-cause-au
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

One day they will realize that libertarianism is a Jewish scam to destroy nations and divide the whites for easier defeat.

Education honestly

doesn't help if they're sub-100 IQ

wut

>Free market is bad
That's patently untrue

>Competition is a bad thing!
>Countries should be forced to make things in places where it's more expensive to do so!
Fuck off, commie.

These people don't exist outside of the internet. No one cares.

the end result of libertarianism is the same as socialism- communism.

Government should only fulfill the key functions such as protection of the citizens (Up to and including Fraud), emergency services (Firefighters/Police) and maintenance of the infrastructure via taxation.

Let the market deal with it's own problems. Some regulation is needed to prevent fraudulent behavior and corruption though. So Libertarianism is a double edged sword.

The government's duties are to serve the citizens only, to uphold the laws and keep society in order. A government official is not beholden to any interests but to that of the country.

>Small, non invasive government leads to large invasive government
Are you high or just retarded?

>understanding economics is anti-white
>all libertarians are the same
Since all socialists are the same, I'm sure Hitler agrees with Bernie

Hoppe is not even a libertarian though. He's a more or less a fascist.

It's good for some things, but bad for others.

If all you care about is hoarding shekels, it's great. If you care about preserving a nation and your people as a distinct and sovereign entity, it's total shite.

...

Libertarianism doesn't even have one place in history to point at and say "Yes that is what we want."

It's because such extreme individualism cannot defend itself against other more collectivist ideologies. At least the commies have the Paris Commune and the Anarcho-syndicalists during the spanish civil war to talk about as their meme magic working.

Libertarianism is a joke. A ghost of an ideology that's essentially the equivalent of some endangered cave fish that dies instantly when exposed to sunlight.

>wants no borders, no nations
>calls anyone else a communist

communists want one world with no nations, borders, races, etc just like libertarians

both ideologies are perfectly represented by John Lennon's faggotry

youtube.com/watch?v=XLgYAHHkPFs

>supports coercion against undesirables
>not a fascist

"My vision of the border with Mexico is that a truck from the United States going into Mexico and a truck coming from Mexico into the United States will pass each other at the border going 60 miles an hour. Yes, we should have open borders."

- Gary Johnson Libertarian nominee for president

ontheissues.org/2012/Gary_Johnson_Immigration.htm

>where it's more expensive to do so!

You mean where people get paid good wages and have high living standards

once again libertarians prove to be globalists.

youtube.com/watch?v=Tb8cErokGFs

This is a libertarian board you fucking subhuman,


go here if you think the government should intervene in markets

>still believing that guy wasn't an authoritarian bootlicker trying to defame libertarianism through absurdist false flagging
Check his fucking tattoo and stop posting that gif/picture.

It's only an approach, at least to me. True libertarianism would not be compatible with the complexity of American enterprise probably, and would likely leave more decent people in poverty, but the notion is that certain functions of government should be rightly rejected. This is an important perspective because Republicans (or at least part) have given up on opposing federalism, and now seek to bend it in favor of their donors versus Democrat donors. I would prefer to not be at the mercy of two conglomerates duking it out for who should write law, and instead eradicate law that seeks to take a shit on me.

>This is a libertarian board

No it's not you aspie fucking faggot.

The best way to maximize freedom while at the same time ensuring it survives for a long time requires libertarian sensibilities combined with a stiff dose of reality codified in a Constitutional system of government that is highly resistant to change and manipulation. Border/immigration/citizenship/voting controls, checks and balances, explicit rights protections.

The US Constitution was a good first try, flawed as it was. Hopefully the next one is stronger and harder to change/manipulate/work around. If done right, you can let libertarians goof off all they want and stability is still protected via a strong Constitutional rule set.

But ultimately it's the armed peasants that need to keep their government in line and we have chosen bread and circuses over guard duty. That, I would argue, needs fixing more than the libertarians.

Go watch the Libertarian Party cringe compilation and tell me that the entire party is not a fucking joke.

It is a joke, but by neonazis who view libertarianism as a threat to their membership, as people are driven right they're worried they'll divert to libertarianism instead of nazism.

This is why 60-80% of libertarians are laughable, they're actually Nazis.

>posting anime

closed borders libertarian is god tier ideology fuck off

it was

Stop trying to meme that into existence. You cannot justify closed borders using Libertarian ideology.

>less government
>Jewish

Pick one.

no government means control by multinational corporations and international finance without any national sovereignty i.e. modern EU

>implying anarchy = libertarianism

Reminder that if you call yourself far right and espouse for stricter government regulation of the economy or social life then you're a deluded leftist.

youtube.com/watch?v=Tb8cErokGFs

Holy fucking kek this is so autistic

>how do we fix libertarians?

easy, just assign them to crumbling public roads and watch them go mad

Sure you can, it's easy, watch: those other countries aren't operating on free market principals and the free-borders is a one-way-valve strain on the system.

That easy.

>too dumb to know how the political spectrum works

classic ancap autism

the left right spectrum comes from the days of the French Revolution.

The right in those days supported the monarchy, the left supported Republicanism and establishing a French Republic.

the right basically means "preserving current social order" while the left means "changing current social order". Right and left has nothing to do with freedom or lack of freedom it has to do with whether you want society to change or not and how.

Fascism, Communism -> left
Anarchy, Mob Rule -> right

top kek

>The terms "Right" and "Left" refer to political affiliations originating early in the French Revolutionary era of 1789–1799, and referred originally to the seating arrangements in the various legislative bodies of France. As seen from the Speaker's seat at the front of the Assembly, the aristocracy sat on the right (traditionally the seat of honor) and the commoners sat on the left, hence the terms Right-wing politics and Left-wing politics.

>Originally, the defining point on the ideological spectrum was the Ancien Régime ("old order"). "The Right" thus implied support for aristocratic or royal interests, and the church, while "The Left" implied support for republicanism, secularism, and civil liberties.[4] Because the political franchise at the start of the revolution was relatively narrow, the original "Left" represented mainly the interests of the bourgeoisie, the rising capitalist class (with notable exceptions such as the proto-communist Gracchus Babeuf). Support for laissez-faire commerce and free markets were expressed by politicians sitting on the left, because these represented policies favorable to capitalists rather than to the aristocracy; but outside of parliamentary politics, these views are often characterized as being on the Right.

>left/right spectrum
classic libertarianism

>posting the retarded shill compass
>actually believes you can be authoritarian right
>actually thinks left wing hasn't always historically meant bigger government
>falling for the social order meme

You probably think NatSoc is far right too.

>quoting wikipedia as a reliable political source

Kek.

>As capitalist economies developed, the aristocracy became less relevant and were mostly replaced by capitalist representatives. The size of the working class increased as capitalism expanded, and began to find expression partly through trade unionist, socialist, anarchist, and communist politics, rather than being confined to the capitalist policies expressed by the original "left". This evolution has often pulled parliamentary politicians away from laissez-faire economic policies, although this has happened to different degrees in different countries.

are you outright denying basic history?

kek, yet again libertarian autism knows no bounds

The pro aristocracy and pro monarchy supporters were on the right. After politics shifted the bourgeoisie (business owners, middle class, etc) were on the right with the communists on the left.

Hitler wanted to preserve the private ownership of the means of production and the middle class bourgeoisie against the communists who wanted public ownership of the means of production.

Saying Hitler was on the left is nonsense, but then again it's perfectly predictable from your average autistic libertarian

reason.com/blog/2011/07/20/being-libertarian-may-cause-au

>You probably think NatSoc is far right too.

It's certainly not left wing or center

the farthest right you can get is monarchy and aristocracy though, that's where the terms originally come from.

I think OP meant free trade, rather than free market. They're not the same thing.