I hope Hillary is let go. Am I the only one of this opinion? I hate her. I love Trump. That's why I want her in the race.
If Hillary is indicted, the Dems will nominate Joe Biden. Trump will have a much harder time beating him. Democrats like Joe Biden. They hate Hillary.
>implying biden isnt also guilty of some shady shit
But Biden wouldn't be that bad
But Trump is already going to los against Clinton. Wouldn't you like to shake things up and at least have a chance?
Honestly, only the Sanders supporters care since Trump is bridging his numbers against Hillary.
a Biden ticket would be good.
Only second to a Bloomberg/Christie Rep ticket
Biden wouldn't fuck us up as bad as Hillary would, at least.
It'd be better if she wasn't indicted, considering Bernie polls much higher against Trump.
It probably wouldn't be Biden. Delegates would prefer to vote for someone who actually ran.
Trump won't have a harder time with Biden. He'll have an impossible time with Biden. He won't beat him. I wonder if this is all part of some master plan?
>let's run someone who hasn't campaigned at all!
Yeah, that's not gonna backfire or anything.
He's been #BidenHisTime
I'm nervous.
Sanders would be a funner contestant on the democratic side.
Trump would be completely fucking destroyed.
Too bad the democratic establishment would rather lose the general election than nominate him.
Yeah but at least Biden isn't a war criminal
Sanders is only popular among millennials and disabled fat democrats. They won't nominate him.
If she isn't indited the trust of the US judicial system will officially reach zero and nothing could be possibly done to repair that.
The FBI I'm sure is completely aware of the weight of their decision here.
>If Hillary is indicted, the Dems will nominate Joe Biden
Joe 'Let me sniff that loli cun.. I mean hair' Biden?
What's the problem? He is white male, because of that?!
BIDEN 2016
FREE LOLIS FOR EVERYONE
seriously, the only way to save ur white meme race is to legalize sex with lolis like the good old times.
uhmm white lolis
Sanders has much higher approval ratings and probably would have gotten the democratic nomination if it wasn't for the establishment media fucking him over from the very start of the race.
President Biden would be almost as funny as Trump for POTUS.
someone post those biden loli webms
No, that was Sanders own stupid fault by refusing to take an aggressive platform against Clinton. If he had been combative against her rather than resorting to cucking himself by exclaiming, " I wish we wud stahp tawking about ya' damn emails," he might have won.
He could definitely have run a stronger campaign, but the media still fucked him over completely.
Check out statistics for airtime between candidates, and also analyse what they actually did with that airtime.
They were still asking Sanders what "democratic socialism" means by May.
Nice try shillhill but the dirty hag is getting arrested.
> biden
Really? The dnc convention didnt happen yet so the superdelegates will just jump to bernie. I hope it does go to biden because of the bernie faggots going full suicide.
The only reason Sanders has a higher approval ratings is because most people don't know jack shit about him. They see him as that Democrat guy that isn't corrupt. Once the spotlight is on him and you hear all the retardation spewing out of his idiotic cunt mouth, all of his approval goes out the window.
Yes the establishment super delegates, who opted for HILLARY CLINTON over Bernie, will surely choose him over Joe Biden, the current VP.
I disagree. I think people like him because he's the only person that gives solid answers and a motivation for change.
Obama is on the campaign trail with her today, do you fucks really think he would want to be near her when shit was going to hit the fan? She's fine
I really don't care who Trump runs against as long as he wins. He has to win. He simply has to.
If you think Hillary has less of a chance than Biden then go ahead and do your praying or whatever you're talking about to make sure Trump runs against her. I don't care. I just want Trump to win.
>he's the only person that gives solid answers
"Make no mistake, climate change is responsible for the rise of ISIS" - Bernie Sanders, second (or was it third?) Democrat debate.
How's that for a solid answer? The guy has either sub-80 IQ (and I believe he doesn't), or he's just a batshit insane old man with zero touch to the same physical reality the rest of us occupy.
The only reason people like him is because he isn't Hillary and they don't know him.
The liberals were ecstatic about the RNC's treatment of Ron Paul. But now I hope they learned that their amble support of it then allowed the DNC to do the same thing to Bernie Sanders.
It's sad that the left have tunnel vision, I don't support the guy but he was definitely jibbed in favor of hegemony.
I don't recall what specific quote you're referring to or what the context was behind it, but I'll try and explain what my actual point is.
He's the only principled candidate of the bunch. His entire campaign's foundation is on specific issues and what he plans to do to solve them, and these are stances he's held for literal decades. Agree or disagree with his diagnosis that you can't deny his honesty. And plenty of people agree with his diagnosis (not just young entitled people or numales or whatever shit like Fox news tries to push).
They wouldn't really have much of a choice. The only other feasible option is Sanders.
>I don't recall what specific quote you're referring to or what the context was behind it
The question was ISIS related and how Islam ties into the group. Sanders basically said "ISIS has nothing to do with Islam, climate change is responsible for its creation". My jaw dropped.
>He's the only principled candidate of the bunch
An unprincipled person is much better suited to lead than someone whose pretty much every single principle is founded on lunacy and idiotic, unrealistic ideology.
>His entire campaign's foundation is on specific issues and what he plans to do to solve them
And each of those are unworkable and counter-productive.
>Agree or disagree with his diagnosis that you can't deny his honesty.
I don't care about someone's honesty if he/she is as laughably incompetent as Sanders.
>(not just young entitled people or numales or whatever shit like Fox news tries to push).
The voting statistics prove you wrong. It's literally just white college kiddie pot smokers and old, morbidly obese disabled fucks.
>The question was ISIS related and how Islam ties into the group. Sanders basically said "ISIS has nothing to do with Islam, climate change is responsible for its creation". My jaw dropped.
You're not forced to agree with every one of his opinions to see the merits in the movement he has helped create. I still feel like what you're paraphrasing is probably a considerable over-simplification of his actual view, though.
>An unprincipled person is much better suited to lead than someone whose pretty much every single principle is founded on lunacy and idiotic, unrealistic ideology.
Obviously we disagree on the basis of his principles.
The rest of what you said is a matter of actual policy discussion which we will obviously not agree on... So no point addressing that.
>The voting statistics prove you wrong. It's literally just white college kiddie pot smokers and old, morbidly obese disabled fucks.
I just don't think you're even being honest with yourself now.
>I just don't think you're even being honest with yourself now.
So who did vote for him, then? Blacks didn't, Hispanics didn't, most working-class whites didn't... what does that leave him with?
Wait Sup Forums.
If Biden is chosen instead of Bernie, the Bernouts are going to go INSANE!
PLEASE LET THIS HAPPEN!
Apparently enough people to put him only a couple of hundred delegates behind Clinton, despite the biases against him. College-age people/students are part of the hyper-informed age, their opinion on who they choose to follow on the campaign trail is probably worth paying attention to.
Your monolithic voting block view of politics & opinion is probably what prevents you from actually forming an opinion beyond "but blacks didn't vote for him!" instead of looking for the real reasons behind why that may be.
How many black do you think vote Republican compared to Democrat?
>Apparently enough people to put him only a couple of hundred delegates behind Clinton
Irrelevant. She beat him by 3 million votes while being the most notoriously corrupt person in American politics. That's how much people don't like the insane zealot.
>College-age people/students are part of the hyper-informed age
No, they are not. They are safe space dwellers who get panic attacks when exposed to opinions not their own. College-age people are the stupidest group you'll ever meet outside of mountain villages with no electricity.
>How many black do you think vote Republican compared to Democrat?
How about you stop moving goalposts? We're talking Bernie (and Hillary by extension) here, not Republicans.
And yes, blacks are a monolith. Roughly 92% of them vote Democrat, and pretty much all of that goes to the establishment candidate. That is, by fucking definition, a monolith.
>Irrelevant. She beat him by 3 million votes while being the most notoriously corrupt person in American politics.
She's only corrupt to and that only matters to people who are actually informed. Networks like CNN barely even mention this sort of thing, and their viewership age average is much lower than most of the right wing media. I simply think you don't understand how harshly kneecapped Sanders was by the media when it comes to the low-information voters that gave Clinton the lead she has.
>How about you stop moving goalposts?
I'm not moving the goalposts, I'm using that as an example to explain how Clinton may have gotten a black vote by default instead of through actual issues.
>I simply think you don't understand how harshly kneecapped Sanders was by the media when it comes to the low-information voters that gave Clinton the lead she has.
You have no idea how lucky he was with the media. If they really wanted to bury him, they would've started talking about his actual policies and what they would involve. Clinton would've beaten him by 10 million votes then.
>I'm using that as an example to explain how Clinton may have gotten a black vote by default instead of through actual issues
You're acting as if these were the first elections where blacks voted for the establishment Democrat.
Maybe Sanders should've focused on getting the white vote by not saying stuff like "whites don't know what it's like to be poor" instead of pandering to blacks that never would've voted for him anyway. Just another show of his laughable incompetence and complete idiocy.
>You have no idea how lucky he was with the media. If they really wanted to bury him, they would've started talking about his actual policies and what they would involve.
I'll just say that the more real exposure he got the more people he got voting for him.
If by "real exposure" you mean airing his promises that were completely impossible to keep, then sure. I don't recall the media being too loud about all the potential downsides and dangers of his policies.
Again we're just gonna be disagreeing on whether or not his policies are realistic.
Let's end it here, nice talking though
The Bernouts will still fall in line with the party.