What does Sup Forums think of this?

What does Sup Forums think of this?

ted.com/talks/alexander_betts_why_brexit_happened_and_what_to_do_next?utm_campaign=social&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_content=talk&utm_term=global-social issues

Other urls found in this thread:

npiamerica.org/research/category/what-the-founders-really-thought-about-race
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Globalist faggot furthering socialism. Who gives a fuck?

As Stephen Coughlin says in "Catastrophic Failure," scientistic faith or false certainty is the delusion of our age. Thing is, leftists are more guilty of it than rightists. Note that Mr Betts wants more "inclusion." Inclusion is a two-way street. If the other fellow comes here, but rejects "here" and is "radicalized," then that is surely not inclusion. I am sincerely curious as to how Mr. Betts plans to erase centuries of unambiguous Islamic jurisprudence to achieve this.

Not going to read that shit, but OPs pic is right.
We do live in a society where facts don't matter, except these people are claiming that the lies are facts, and they're calling truth lies.

That's the problem.
People read shit from the media and facebook and they think to themselves ''I know the truth! Everyone else but me is dumb! BBC told me what is true, therefore I know the truth!''

I agree with the quote but not what he thinks the lies are.
People listen to their facbook feeds and youtube subscriptions more than fact based reasoning and both of those things usually lean left.
Brexit was and is fact based while the remain campaign was all baseless fear mongering on twitter and facebook memes.

>my opinions are irrefutable facts
lol @ the aids-ridden fag

He's right that facts don't matter because if they did he wouldnt have to spend that much time rationalizing why people don't agree with him.

Came here to say this. It's obvious to anyone not a globalist when everyone on brexit was just called racist even when your issues were shit like the eu being undemocratic.
Brexit happened because only the privileged can hide in fantasy and pretend their shit worldview works, the rest of us face reality.

>implying the left ever cared about the truth

I think it's hilarious, leftists are largely to blame for creating this post factual discourse, and now it's biting them in the ass. It should make them think twice about their current attempts to make violence the currency of political discourse, but I doubt they possess the necessary foresight

>and now it's biting them in the ass
But that implies Brexit was the objectively wrong choice, which it wasn't.

Wow after decades upon decades of lies and propaganda by the mainstream media and the people it portrayed as experts, the population lost all their trust in them? Decades of appealing to emotion and misrepresenting facts or simply outright lying left a mark?

Gee golly wiz how unexpected. Who would have thought? There was no way to foresee this, just like every single "expert" failed to foresee the catastrophic financial collapse a decade ago. If only we listened to the factual evidence!!!!

Cry wolf often enough go ahead, but don't come crying after when the wolf comes for you and there is no one left to listen.

>that quote
These people have no self awareness do they.

>divide between those that fear globalization and those that embrace it

unless i'm a multinational corporation why would i embrace globalization? why the fuck would ANYONE embrace it? what sort of fucking bubble does he live in to say shit like this?

I don't get it, did he say that world doesn't care about the truth and thus Brexit happened or vice versa?

Because if it's the opposite then TOP FUCKING LEL

This is so fucking arrogant.

>The sheeple are too dumb to make their own decisions. We need to cull the herd. They believe in lies because they are too stupid. My superior intellect is the truth, and people who disagree with me are dumb, fat, uneducated rednecks who need to be told what's good for them.

trashman.tiff

>It's about globalism vs nationalism
>I don't know anything about my own country
Seems pretty accurate, he's just wrong about globalism being a good thing.

I just want our country to be independent.

Why can't we be a great country like USA, Canada and Australia?

Yeah I know I'll be a couple quid out my pocket for a few years. But you know what.

I got my country back without a single bullet being fired.

TLDW?

>Hasn't invoked article 50

You haven't got shit.

>What did he mean by this?

>Butthurt globalist shilling

>Muh brexit is raycis

>Anyone who doesn't allow themselves to get fucked in the ass by leftists is stupid and uneducated.

sage

muh job creators

Don't you care for workers? Then its only natural you should allow the wealthy to give them work? The corporation is a body made up of cells, each has to work together for each other to succeed. To maim one is to maim both.

So who are you siding with here. The jews, or the workers?

>allow the wealthy to give them work
8/10 almost got me to reply.

Is this guy joking? Academia has been pushing this post-factual discourse ever since postmodernism became en vogue decades ago, which values politics over objective truth.

These self-appointed experts and """intellectuals""" and the real elites who sponsor them are growing increasingly insane and out of touch. I fear the noose might be the only way to bring them back down to earth.

(((OY VEY!!!)))

Nobody can read the future.

Yes, in the short-term, the UK might have some bumps in the road adjusting to WTO rules while hashing out their own treaties.

But in the long-term the UK is opening themselves up to trade with 85% of the world. The EU makes up only 15% of possible world trade. For instance, Germany's biggest export is automobiles. Where the UK may suffer on not buying brand new VWs, they make up for by eliminating the excise taxes that essentially make your Ford, GMs, Toyotas, Mitsubishis etc etc higher. I mean the list goes on.

This falls back onto why millions will vote for Trump. It's not that he's the best candidate, but he's not a lefty that says, "You don't agree with me, therefore, you are wrong." And doing so, so smugly.

Alexander Betts has never been anything but a yuppie, and like many upper-middle to upper class leftist, don't have the real world experiences of ACTUALLY working 40-60 hours just to feed your family and pay a mortgage, etc. So when immigrants come in and undercut your jobs and ruin your neighborhoods because of their tendency to crime, that's something Betts never experienced. Same thing with taxes. It's easy to say everybody should have a 50+ tax when you are a professor at fucking Oxford, but how about when you're just trying to make a modest living and take care of your family. All Betts hears is what is in his leftist echo chamber.

...

Restrictions, restrictions are no fun. Unless you're restricting everyone!

>We are right and you are wrong, and we know this for a certainty, so bow down and take it while we destroy your values and the free democracy that allowed them and your country to flourish

really makes you think

Just watched, typical metropolitan liberal. His epiphany is that people voted leave because of fear of globalisation and belief of lies, and that elites need to be more 'inclusive'.

Absolutely clueless.

It's true, perception shapes reality.

That's why leftists have such a chokehold on society. Controlling the narrative is the next best thing to absolute mind control.

Thats true although its a double edged sword, both left and right (and whatever other side you desire) employ both truth and fact and show them as all fact and shows the truths and lies of the other side as all lies. what is true and what isn't has no bearing any more.

>them and your country

Our. Our country. We have to stop dehumanizing liberals because of the loud crazy ones. It's the equivalent of them hating the right wing because of the skinheads, and then redirecting focus from talking about right wing ideals, to talking about how they are garbage.

This us vs them mentality needs to stop. Freudian slip, my friend. Persuasion of the people works best when you are not berating and shaming them. If you use the methodology of the SJW's and transfer over to their state of mind using shame to control their little branch of the left wing, it will result in no different results than them. A bunch of whiny 20 something year old failures who dye their hair and march around in public like a bunch of faggots.

Alright. Still don't like faggots burning American flags one second and then demanding the populace disarm themselves the next, but yeah, you're right.

Hopefully this leftist fever dies down after Trump gets elected. Gonna take a whole lot of ice packs for the butthurt come November.

Remember. The movement needs quality people who use reason. Not the sheep that get attracted by authority who shames, berates, and makes them hate themselves unless they switch to their side.

I can guarantee you they would hate niggers so much if they had a tendency to be right-wingers who aren't parasites on society.

I love watching the left reach the conclusion that the real problem with democracy is those nasty voting people.

So many outlets, even "serious" media ones, have had articles arguing for totalitarianism and the demolishing of democracy and direct voting.

It's like I'm living in a fever dream.

After all these years of fighting "muh evil nazis" that were completely nonexistent, they have embraced and become what they claimed to be protecting us against. It's fucking disgusting.

I mean, lets take for example, Milo, le dangerous faggot man. He's brought an entirely new perspective to viewing the right wing into light, some may say he's changing it for the better, which obviously does also allow for more subversion because of lending him the power of influence and change with your support.

Quality over quantity. We need a quality group of principled, moral, reasonable people. Not the retards who get attracted by silly ideals like equality and "the greater good".

anybody noticed the left is using the ironclad arguments against them (not using logic and evidence) against anyone who disagrees with them more now? crazy shit

I was literally saying this exact thing on Sup Forums last night before this was posted and everyone called me retarded.

Well, everyone here is calling this guy retarded too so oh well but still at least I am not retarded alone.

I was trying to explain why the latest generation tends to end every sentence with a question mark, I was saying how since evidence and truth no longer matter that its become impolite to speak as if you know anything definitely, thus it has caused people to speak leaving room to disagree.

Is this image supposed to be in outer space or underwater?

And who is that? Vishnu?

When did TED go full retard lads?

>I was trying to explain why the latest generation tends to end every sentence with a question mark

Because usually those are the writers and activists who are trying to facilitate discussion. Can't have a discussion without a bunch of questions. The whole politically correct culture of not being able to speak needs to be purged though, definitely won't be missed. It'll get us back on the right track in regards to actual democratic values, anyway.

It always was, you were just too blind to see it

> without a single bullet being fired.
> mfw her constituency voted Leave

Scott Adams was right again

Idiots. Elections have always been won with memes and slogans, not nuanced argumentation. The only change is the evolution of the media.

I'm not dehumanising liberals, but to say there isn't a divide between those who wish to rule others by keeping them under thumb, for the sake of globalist ideas that they themselves hold for the good of their own wealth and their masters, is sheer delusion.

It's exactly your kind of pearl clutching and overkindness for groupthink that has led to so many being afraid to voice their concerns for the fears of being called racist and for not being "tolerant", and pushed us into the headlong collapse we're in.

Democracy is only acceptable as long as people vote the way the elites want. We have defied them and now we can expect a sustained propaganda campaign from the powers that be to demonise democracy.

It's not even just the left really-- this is the new philosophy that has been selected for humanity to follow. Even the "right wing" doesn't use any rhetoric that appeals to natural human desire to live with their own kind, preserve their traditions etc. They can't-- all that shit is racist and must be expunged.

White people have always been most vulnerable to ideological exploitation. The Japanese are still worshipping their rock, tree and sky gods, the indians are still praying to Vishnu. We got rid of our old gods the instant christianity came on the scene, and now we're butchering YHWH on the marxist altar.

We won't make very good muslims. I suspect those white genes will be bred out in the caliphate-- we'll just drop islam for any pretty lie that anyone brings up, and be execute for apostasy.

>It's exactly your kind of pearl clutching and overkindness for groupthink

No, I'm against groupthink, including groupthink towards liberals

Liberty and justice for all, our founding fathers knew this, especially the people you dislike.

You can paint the picture over all liberals (granted its understandable because they control the discourse that flows through most media and are very very loud about it) but trying to get the moderates on our side is really the only way. The people who are easily brainwashed by hatred wind up the equivilant a screaming fat SJW. We must never resort to the tactics of enemies on a moral scale when not firing bullets. This it not war, these are your fellow Americans who have been brainwashed by the elite. Help them. Scorn the ones that don't wish nor care to rise above that liberal ignorance. But do not see each and every liberal as the same person with the same ideals and the same agenda. The person fills the role of the title, the title doesn't fill the role of the person.

>Brexit
>Good idea

Pick one

>Science
>False certainty
You don't even realize how dumb you sound. Science is about QUESTIONING and CONFIRMING, not just saying "welp this is how it is and that's all there is to it because the expert said so."

The only ones with "false certainty" are the idiots like you who buy into all the nonsensical right-wing rhetoric and nationalist bullshit.

Just imagine how bad it will get if Trump wins.

>Science is about QUESTIONING and CONFIRMING
Unless it supports a left-wing viewpoint, in which case it's dogma and you're an ignorant bigot to dare question it.

I can see if my various thoughts and beliefs come across as shilling. I understand taking the moral high road involves giving up some power.

Imagine George Washington running for three terms? That rejection of that extra four years of power paved the way of long-term prosperity for the nation to flourish under his care and judgement.

I absolutely can assure this to you though, and it's so true - the Path Of Light involves more than resorting to degenerate enemy tactics, recruiting degenerate people using that degenerate methodology and absolutely IMPLODING everything the movement stood for.

> Science is about QUESTIONING and CONFIRMING

Then why do liberals constantly hate when Americans question science?

ted
more like
jew

You need to put the star of david on that kike Edward Bernays, father of modern advertising and nephew of the jew Freud.

The problem is that even the most moderate, seemingly reasonable point of view that modern society could come up with is absolutely suicidal.

Japan "needs workers" and "has to allow more immigrants" to "pay for their retirement" and "fill undesirable jobs," but they refuse. For good reason-- they understand on some visceral level, that if they allow foreigners to just settle in their lands whenever they want, it will cease to be Japan.

It appears that most europeans don't have that instinctive understanding. Even the most "reasonable" idea, of allowing immigrants, still destroys our civilization in a few generations.

I'm OK with Hindus, don't get me wrong, and any kind of east Asian is OK by me. But we will still cease to be the same society in 100 years with them coming here, and while that's not necessarily a bad thing, it's by no means good either.

But they don't even want to stop there. They want unskilled, unselected migrants for go knows what reason. And they'll get it too. They'll get everything they want.

Because the narrative says they're on the right side of history. And they'll go on believing that, probably even in the last ten seconds of consciousness they have after they get beheaded by muslim zealots in their home towns.

Horseshit, you newfag. The founding fathers weren't psychopaths and knew that "a people make a place" and made it quite clear America was for WHITES ONLY.

npiamerica.org/research/category/what-the-founders-really-thought-about-race

I began to stop being liberal when Sup Forums mocked them relentlessly

being nice to marxists while they attack like lunatics is a terrible idea and exactly what they want you to do, you are plying right into their alinsky tactics

>egalitarians/classic liberals made the same mistake
>they are pretty much disenfranchised and dying as an ideology

>Because the narrative says they're on the right side of history.

We can't follow their narrative and follow their tactics. The first step to giving a state legitimacy is acknowledging it exists. Globalism absolutely must be stopped, and that includes taking out the social aspects, but with all diseases you must treat the root cause, and not the symptom. Globalism pushes liberal degeneracy, not the other way around. You're focusing your hate on the wrong person.

Do not focus the hate on the people. Focus the hate on those who are manipulating the people. You have to remember, they have been brainwashed - you must bring them out with reason and logic, not further brainwashing, even if it is right wing, because if you wind up succeeding, that person was most likely a degenerate who could have easily been manipulated into doing the bidding of the higher ups.

What happened to moot?

>linking some shitty article written by a jew

I don't care about any kike named spencer. I don't care about your social ideologies. We are concerning ourselves with the higher ups, they are the root CAUSING these degenerate social ideologies. You have to stop attacking the symptoms - aim directly for the cancer itself, and everything will resolve.

Because it shows you don't understand science.

Correct. The American people wish to understand science by questioning it and having a conversation about it. Attempts to silence the voice of the people do not educate them.

Do not look down upon your equals. You do not know me. Focus on the ideals, not the person behind them, stupid ass liberal.

>We have to stop dehumanizing liberals
Also, disagreeing with someone isn't dehumanizing them. By making this assertion, you're actually dehumanizing us all the more-- painting us as crazy sociopaths who just want to smash anything they don't like.

I realize the potential hypocrisy in saying this, but that's really more the left's preferred tactic. Conservatives for the most part try to get along. They get attacked so mercilessly in public, that a lot of leftists don't even think they know any at all-- and would be aghast if they thought someone they knew was one.

>Uses misleading graph
>Oh no, some speculators that were too stupid to pull out will lose some sheckles
>And then gain them back
This has almost zero effect on most people.

Science isn't about ideals, dumbass. Science is about making observations, testing hypotheses, and confirming through repetition and empirical evidence. The fact that you think science in and of itself should be questioned tells me that you don't understand it. Science doesn't get questioned. Individual results may be questioned, by the scientific process itself is what has gotten us as far as we've come. When you start questioning that because you don't understand it, then yes you look like a complete fucking moron.

That's a good article written by Jared Taylor. He simply quotes and sources the founding fathers (and later presidents') views on race, that it is extremely important and this country was intended to be white man's land.

I think I jumped the gun and wanted to attack the common misnomer of "liberty and justice for all" being a way to promote multiculturalism, when in fact we were never intended to be multicultural.

Richard Spencer is not a kike, btw. He might be gay, though.

>Also, disagreeing with someone isn't dehumanizing them.

I agree. I'm speaking to the people who do dehumanize them, not the ones that don't, and just simply disagree.

>Britain imports most of its food
>Their money is now worthless
>This has almost zero effect on most people.

>Individual results may be questioned

Semantics. This is what was originally conveyed, but misinterpreted by you.

hey we've found a true believer

The guy in the OP's vid ticks about every box. Another feminine beta masochist who hates his country, nothing to see here

It's a great case study in how different groups of people all think they have a monopoly on "the facts", when in fact "facts" have been conflated with principle in many instances.

A lot of what gets passed off as science kind of sucks-- especially recently. The way research and grants etc... work at universities right now, a LOT of scientific funding gets funneled to whomever tickles the right ideological spots, and potentially groundbreaking stuff is buried, or has to hide its true intent under a lot of double-talk in order to get approved.

It's not just ideological, a lot of it is economic and prestige based. Apparently, it's nigh impossible to get a project approved to just understand something better-- you always have to link it back to cancer, diabetes or alzheimer's or something. The people giving the grants want prestige and shallow results.

"Science" -- the Platonic ideal, floating in space -- is not the same thing as an actor in a lab coat touting the research breakthroughs achieved by Halls of Medicine.
You have this idea, which is exactly what I was talking about, that it's a one-step process and it's over. This is why Hillary thinks war is easy. I think that when you are older, you will have seen that reality has a nasty habit of escaping our complete grasp.
As science writer and medical doctor Ben Goldacre likes to represent actual scientific progress, I think you'll find it's a little more complicated than that.

> Post-factual society
Now watch as he plays fast and loose with the distinction between facts and interpretations of what disparate facts mean. Pay special attention to the part where all the facts end up confirming the beliefs that he had before he got the facts.

My personal belief is that multiculti in America at least, seems to be it's future and is currently out of the peoples hands. Spics and niggers will breed and America will (most likely) never have the political climate to grant the president the ability to deport American citizens on a whim. Hopefully Europe goes down a different path than it's currently going down - it still has hope in a lot of areas.

But I try not to think negatively like that. I have no explanation for these beliefs at the moment because those conclusions come from multiple multiple different sources for obvious reasons - it's best to get all sorts of viewpoints and sort each single sentence of every one out to make sure the cream of the crop rises to the top and blends perfectly. So obviously take these beliefs with a grain of salt.

God damnit I need to learn to be that succinct.

The premise is right, but the conclusion is a non sequitur.

>Apparently, it's nigh impossible to get a project approved to just understand something better-- you always have to link it back to cancer, diabetes or alzheimer's or something. The people giving the grants want prestige and shallow results.

Do you see how these cancerous systems always find its seeds in the needless bureaucracy of collectivist principles? We need to attack it at the CORE so freedom can flow from the top down back to the scientists hands, wrestled away from some individual corrupt people occupying their titles currently in government.

The most correct yet least self-aware thing it's possible to say.
If you don't immediately dismiss someone coming at you with "BRO IT'S LIKE ALL LIES AND SHIT WAKE UP I KNOW THE TRUTH" you are literally part of the problem.

>This is what was originally conveyed
Not at all. What was conveyed is that someone doesn't trust science because they see it as some kind of big bad authority figure telling them what to think. That's not what science is, but Sup Forums fails to understand this.

Hannan said it in less.

>The facts are ahead of the research.

Cap'n'Cuck

he's talking about his own maddening double think idealogy... right?

I doubt it.

He's exactly the kind of man Orwell was warning us against.

Marxists and communists (and their modern ilk: the globalist) have been singing the same tune since the start.

Who knows at this point. I hope America dies (at least the jewish version of it), but that whites survive and eventually create something better. You never know what will happen, though. If things really do come crashing down in a big happening like scenario, it would be quite possible to enforce a mass deportation or killing type scenario. People get radical and angry when their survival is at stake.

It's true. Remainiacs lied, and lied, and lied, and they got their asses handed to them.

The populaces individual opinions on the "science" that comes out (read:sensationalist headlines that go through a telephone game with millions of people) are what I was concerned about. Maybe I misinterpreted you. Whoops.

is that guy wearing cthulhu as underpants?

I hate how leftists are always convinced everything they present is a fact.
This isn't even a hyperbole, look at the shit they do. Politifact, anyone?
Fucking ministry of truth-tier.

Surely that should be a tedx

>i will talk as if my worldview in indisputable fact for several minutes

Yeah, thats new for a liberal.

Really entices one to ponder

hoist by their own petard