>m-muh propoganda
>every film about history needs to be completely accurate! if i keep saying this i'll look smart! f-fucking holywood audience dumb!
M-muh propoganda
Other urls found in this thread:
was this movie propaganda?
Mel Gibson looks like he sucks cocks, always has. He's got a major case of "gay face".
>kills an entire fort on his own
>literally cucks the prince of England or whatever it was
>comic relief scenes right before the climatic battle of movie like it's some Prequel shit
it should be in the same genre as Robin Hood with Costner
>should be
It already is. It's one step above robinhood men in tights
Yes. Gibson's made very little effort to hide his hatred of England.
Fuck England though, the place is shit. You know what?!! Fuck the Queen too, and fuck 'er little doggies while you're at it!
highlander is more historically accurate than this meme movie
>Battle of Stirling Bridge
>No bridge
What did Mel mean by this?
this tbqh
Hello, Nigel de Wigglesworth-Steinberg
>Australian-American playing a Scot who kills a lot of English
Does Mel have something against England?
tbf he didn't want to star in it and wanted to cast a nobody, but producers threatened to back out of funding it
Gladiator was much better.
the wheat wasn't realistic for that time period
Historical accuracy matters, shithead. Gibson is a cultural criminal for this.
these are both propagandistic movies, watch this 20 mins in
it's funny how triggered the inbred britcancer gets. i hope one day your entire cancerous island gets nuked out of existence. literal subhumans
>tfw true kino while still being historically accurate
Braveheart is a really good movie. Just because it makes old English people look bad doesn't mean it's personally attacking you, OP. It'll be ok. Nobody's making fun of you.
You're the only butthurt one here friendo
Post comprehension: 0
It should aim for some accuracy faggot #alternative fact
fuck the queen
t. American
Heh, watched this for the first time just the other day. If I take it as a fantasy movie it's pretty great. Take it at face value and it's pretty shitty.
the bloodthirsty warmongers deserve every ounce of hate they get
Australian-American implies he was born in America to Australian parents
The face paint is where I draw the line, too far into absolute memery
you tell me
>Letting the flag touch the ground
Pretty shitty patriotism desu
>every film about history needs to be completely accurate!
I think having the Spanish land 600 years early was a less a nit pick about it being completely accurate, and more a nit pick about being completely inaccurate.
Though at least in the theater I saw that in, pretty much everyone started murmuring WTF at the same time.
Can you name another historical movie that takes place within recorded history and gets the date that wrong?
But we know for a fact history is a lie
How is it propaganda when everyone loved Longshanks?
Honestly, as long as no one is watching Braveheart then claiming to know all of English/Scottish history, I really don't see what the problem is with embellishing details to make for a better story.
>b-but muh robert da bruce!
Fuck off, Robert's betrayal is one of the most powerful scenes in the whole film.
No, it just didn't take a particularly kind of view of British Military Officers. That doesn't make it propaganda. It just means their intended audience likely was not British Military Officers.
I hate when people shit on Mel for historical inaccuracy bullshit.
Studied abroad at the London School of Economics & Political Science while I was an undergrad and one of my LSE professors would NOT stop bitching about how much he hated Mel Gibson and George Bush. He would find a way to work into EVERY SINGLE LECTURE that
>A. The Patriot was historically inaccurate and we are all tossers for liking it.
>B. The Iraq War was the biggest mistake in the entirety of history and George Bush is literally Hitler
The only people who seem super butthurt over these movies are the Brits.
Good ol Braveheart